Skip to content

RibFix Blu Thoracic Fixation System Versus Non-surgical Treatment in Non-flail Chest Rib Fractures

Prospective Multi-center Comparative Study of RibFix Blu Thoracic Fixation System Versus Non-surgical Treatment in Non-flail Chest Rib Fractures

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05146986
Enrollment
167
Registered
2021-12-07
Start date
2022-01-02
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2024-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rib; Fracture

Keywords

Non-flail chest

Brief summary

This is a prospective, multi-center, observational, cohort study involving skilled cardiothoracic surgeons who are experienced in implanting the treatment of non-flail chest rib fractures and the use of RibFix Blu Thoracic Fixation System.

Detailed description

The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefits of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) in patients with non-flail chest rib fractures using RibFix Blu Thoracic Fixation System when compared to non-surgical (analgesia and symptomatic management) treatment. The study will include up to 167 cases of non-flail chest rib fractures with 95 cases in non-surgical treatment group and 72 cases in the surgical group. Each center may enroll up to maximum 30 cases to permit the assessment of outcome across a variety investigators and clinical settings. Enrolment will be competitive among sites and closed as soon as a total of 167 cases are recruited.

Interventions

DEVICENon surgical and Surgical

For non-surgical group, patients will receive non-surgical treatment (analgesia and symptomatic management treatment). For surgical group, patients will receive surgical treatment using RibFix Blu Thoracic Fixation System.

Sponsors

Zimmer Biomet
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 and above (inclusive) * Simple rib fracture with ≥ 3 consecutive ribs, and the broken ends showed clear displacements * Indicated for surgical repair of rib fractures using RibFix Blu Thoracic Fixation System or non-surgical treatment (analgesia and symptomatic management treatment) * Willing and able to complete scheduled follow-up evaluations as described in the study protocol * Has participated in the Informed Consent process and is willing and able to sign an Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee (IRB/EC) approved Patient Information/ Informed consent Form (PICF)

Exclusion criteria

* Flail chest rib fractures based on radiological or clinical findings * Previous rib fractures or pulmonary problems, requiring continuous oxygen use at home pre-trauma * Presence of any serious medical issues that placed patient in generally poor conditions such that he or she could not tolerate the surgery * Chest trauma associated with severe craniocerebral injury, abdominal organ injury, severe spinal injury, limb fracture, or pelvic fracture requiring long-term bed rest * Has serious medical disease that is a contraindication for general anesthesia, such as cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction and hemorrhagic syndrome * Any contraindications listed in the manufacturer's Instruction to use for RibFix Blu Thoracic Fixation System as per below: * Spanning a midline sternotomy * Active Infection * Foreign body sensitivity * Is known to be pregnant * Is a prisoner, known alcohol or drug user or mentally incompetent or unable to understand what participation in this study entails. * Participation in another surgical intervention that may influence any of the outcome parameters.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thoracic pain as assessed by numeric Rating Scale (NRS)2 weeksLevel of thoracic pain determined using a numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Thoracic pain will be determined using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in which 0 implicates no pain and 10 the worst pain. If a subject is not able to provide a response to the level of thoracic pain,

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Analgesic use12 weeksAnalgesic use by the difference groups
Length of Hospital stay12 weeksLength of Hospital stay by the difference groups
Quality of life using EuroQoL-5L2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeksHealth related qualify of life using EuroQoL-5L(EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires from the different groups. A standardized measure of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions, namely mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L version was used in the study. Each dimension has 5 responses recording 5 levels of severity (no problems/slight problems/moderate problems/severe problems or extreme problems). The responses to the EQ-5D dimensions are used to obtain a single EQ-5D index value where 1 represents full health and 0 represents death. The questionnaire also includes a vertical, visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) for the respondents to record their self-rated health where the 2 extreme ends of the scale are labelled as 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state' respectively
Pulmonary function12 weeksPulmonary function will be assessed by the measuring the forced vital capacity (FVC) using a spirometer.
Number of Participants with respiratory complications2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeksComplications from the different groups assessed to be related to respiratory.

Countries

Australia, South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactIrene Chong
irene.chong@zimmerbiomet.com97566687

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026