Skip to content

Ethics Communication in Groups Among Healthcare Professionals (The Ethics-com Study).

Ethics Communication in Groups Among Healthcare Professionals (The Ethics-com Study).

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05146102
Acronym
Ethics-com
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-12-06
Start date
2021-11-01
Completion date
2022-05-15
Last updated
2021-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ethics Support

Keywords

ethics support, ethical rounds, healthcare personnel

Brief summary

Moral distress has been described as a condition with frustration, guilt, anger and as one reason for health care professionals to leave the profession. Ethics communication in groups has been showed to work as support for health care professionals in ethically difficult situations and further work as a tool to improve the ethical climate and prevent moral distress. Our research group has developed the one to five-step method for interprofessional ethical communication in groups. The overall aim of this project: is to implement and evaluate a method for organized interprofessional communication about ethical issues in healthcare.

Detailed description

Ethically difficult situations are a part of the everyday clinical practice for health care professionals and concerns difficult judgements, prioritization and crucial decisions. Being unable or prevented to act according to one's moral conviction for what is good and right care may increase the risk for health care professionals to experience moral distress. Moral distress has been described as a condition with frustration, guilt, anger and as one reason for health care professionals to leave the profession. Ethics communication in groups has been showed to work as support for health care professionals in ethically difficult situations and further work as a tool to improve the ethical climate and prevent moral distress. Our research group has developed the one to five-step method for interprofessional ethical communication in groups. The method is a stepwise support for facilitating ethics communication in clinical practice when the situations occurs. The overall aim of this project: is to implement and evaluate a method for organized interprofessional communication about ethical issues in healthcare. Significance: The study can generate knowledge about ethics communication in groups in line with the one to five step method, reduce moral distress, create improved ethical climate for healthcare professionals and in turn open up prerequisites for good care.

Interventions

OTHERethics communication in group, in line with the one to five-step method

Healthcare professionals working as ethical representatives at the current ward (n=5) have recently gone through a basic ethics program. They will continue by going through an education program for facilitating ethics communication in group, in line with the one to five-step method The education program has a theoretical and practical approach, which includes the theoretical base of the ethical communication in groups and practicing the one to five method Thereafter, each ethical representative will facilitate interprofessional sessions at a clinical ward, once a month, for six months at their workplace. Gathering meetings for feedback will be offered for the ethical representatives once a month.

Sponsors

Umeå University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The interventiongroup is offered organized interprofessional sessions, once a month, for six months at their workplace. In the the controlgroup, organized interprofessional sessions are not planned at the wards.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthcare professionals working at included wards

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
moral distress meausered by using the Meausure of Moral Distress for Health care Professionals (MMD-HP) and the Moral Distress ThermometerChange from Baseline moral distress at 6 monthsprimary outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ethical climate meausered by the Swedish ethical climate questionnaire (SwECQ)Change from Baseline ethical climate at 6 monthssecondary outcome
experiencesat 6 monthinterviews of the interventiongroup

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Primary ContactMargareta Brännström
margareta.brannstrom@umu.se0761111286

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026