Skip to content

Teach Intubation by Novices in Anaesthesiology

Comparision of Direct Laryngoscopy and Video Laryngoscopy to Learn Successful Tracheal Intubation by Novices in Anaesthesiology

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05145556
Acronym
TeachIntub
Enrollment
10
Registered
2021-12-06
Start date
2021-12-02
Completion date
2024-02-01
Last updated
2023-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Learning Problem, Larynx

Keywords

Tracheal Intubation, Learning Technique, Laryngoscope

Brief summary

Comparision of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy to learn successful tracheal intubation by novices in anaesthesiology

Detailed description

Video laryngoscopy has been recommended as an alternative during difficult conventional direct laryngoscopy using the Macintosh blade. However, successful visualisation of the larynx and tracheal intubation using some of the indirect laryngoscopes or video laryngoscopy requires hand-eye coordination. To best of our knowledge in the current literature there are no data how is the best educative way to learn successful tracheal intubation by novices in anaesthesiology.

Interventions

In a randomized order we evaluate the first pass success rate of the tracheal tube into the trachea.

DEVICEVideolarygoscopy

In a randomised order we evaluate the first pass success rate of the tracheal tube into the trachea.

Sponsors

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Starting with 100 tracheal intubations with conventional tracheal intubation and videolaryngoscopy and after 100 intubations change the device for the next 100 intubations

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 Years * capacity to consent * Present written informed consent of the research participant

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<18 years * Lack of consent * inability to consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First pass success rateat intubation in 60 secondssuccessful tracheal intubation at the first attempt, compared to more than one attempt

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to ventilationat intubation in 120 secondsFrom Insertion of the blase into the mouth until first ventilation
Cormack and Lehane Classificationat intubation in 120 secondsafter insert the device the user describe the glottis visualisation
Overall success rateat intubation in 120 secondsafter two attempts using defined rescue techniques (e.g. rigid stylet, laryngeal mask)
Subjective Training Processat one monthafter 25 intubation attempts

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactMarc MK Kriege, PD Dr
MaKriege@uni-mainz.de00496131170

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026