Skip to content

Recombinant Human C1 Esterase Inhibitor (Conestat Alfa) in the Prevention of Acute Ischemic Cerebral and Renal Events After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Recombinant Human C1 Esterase Inhibitor (Conestat Alfa) in the Prevention of Acute Ischemic Cerebral and Renal Events After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: a Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Investigational Study (PAIR-TAVI).

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05145283
Acronym
PAIR-TAVI
Enrollment
141
Registered
2021-12-06
Start date
2022-03-16
Completion date
2026-01-05
Last updated
2026-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Ischemic Stroke, Acute Renal Injury

Keywords

Severe aortic stenosis (AS), Valvular heart disease, Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), cerebral embolic events, renal embolic events, Ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI), recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor (rhC1INH, conestat alfa), complement system, contact activation system

Brief summary

The aim of this trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of conestat alfa (Ruconest®, Pharming Technologies B.V.) on renal and cerebral ischemic events in patients undergoing TAVI for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) compared to placebo.

Detailed description

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is a frequent valvular heart disease in the elderly with a prevalence of 4 to 10% and a mean survival of only 0.5 to 5 years if left untreated. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved as standard of care for high-, intermediate and potentially even low surgical risk candidates due to a lower perioperative risk compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Despite its relative safety compared to SAVR, embolic events originating from the calcified valve and leading to ischemic stroke and acute renal injury are major complications following TAVI in the acute and subacute period, and are associated with increased morbidity including cognitive decline and mortality. While cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) such as the Sentinel® CEPD (Boston Scientific) were designed to reduce the burden of cerebral embolic events, their impact on clinical events has yet to be determined, and other prophylactic options are currently not available. Ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) is a key pathophysiological mechanism involved in cerebral and renal embolic events after TAVI resulting in activation of endothelial cells, the contact activation and the complement system and attraction of neutrophils to the site of injury. In this regard, recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor (rhC1INH, conestat alfa), a potent inhibitor of the complement and the contact system has been shown to reduce the size of cerebral ischemic damage and of renal injury in experimental IRI models, and has successfully been investigated in a pilot study of acute kidney injury following the administration of contrast media. The aim of the current trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of conestat alfa (Ruconest®, Pharming Technologies B.V.) on renal and cerebral ischemic events in patients undergoing TAVI for severe symptomatic AS compared to placebo.

Interventions

DRUGConestat alfa (Ruconest®)

In the current study, participants will receive two intravenous injections of conestat alfa (immediately during the TAVI procedure and again 3h later) at a dose of 100 U/kg (first dose) and of 50 U/kg (subsequent dose), for patients less than 84 kg; two intravenous injections (immediately during the TAVI procedure and again 4h later) of conestat at a dose of 8400 U (4 vials, first dose) and of 4200 U (2 vials, subsequent dose) for patients of 84 kg body weight or greater. The chosen regimen including repeated administration should increase and maintain serum C1INH levels above twice the serum concentration for six to eight hours in the majority of patients. The timeframe of therapeutic concentrations will cover the period of the TAVI procedure itself and the immediate postprocedural period during which reperfusion and additional ischemic events related to global hypoperfusion may occur.

DRUGNaCl 0.9%)

Normal saline (NaCl 0.9%) will serve as placebo treatment. The respective amount of saline (according to patient weight matching the volume of conestat alfa that would have been used for this patient) will be withdrawn in an opaque syringe for slow IV injection.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER
Swiss National Science Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Pharming Technologies B.V.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomized in two parallel groups to receive either conestat alfa or placebo.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent as documented by signature * Severe AS and scheduled for transfemoral TAVI

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to the class of drugs under study (C1INH), e.g., known hypersensitivity or allergy to class of drugs or the investigational product * History of allergy to rabbits (as rhC1INH is derived from the breast milk of transgenic rabbits) * Women who are pregnant or breast feeding * Hemodynamic instability requiring emergency TAVI * Valve-in-valve procedure * Other access route than transfemoral * Non-cardiac co-morbidity with expected survival \<6 months * Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 30 days before TAVI * Dialysis or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<20 ml/min/1.73m2 * Contraindication for MRI such as a permanent non-MRI compatible pacemaker or severe claustrophobia * Liver cirrhosis (any Child-Pugh score) * Incapacity or inability to provide informed consent * Participation in another study with investigational drug or medical device within the 30 days preceding and during the present study * Previous enrolment into the current study * Any uncontrolled or significant concurrent illness that would put the patient at a greater risk or limit compliance with the study requirements at the discretion of the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total volume of new cerebral ischemic lesions as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)on day 4 (+/-1 day) after transfemoral TAVITotal volume of new cerebral ischemic lesions as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum new lesion volume as measured by MRI (i.e. volume of the largest new lesion)on day 4 (+/-1 day) after transfemoral TAVIMaximum new lesion volume as measured by MRI (i.e. volume of the largest new lesion)
Number of new cerebral ischemic lesions as measured by MRIon day 4 (+/-1 day) after transfemoral TAVINumber of new cerebral ischemic lesions as measured by MRI
Number (incidence) of clinically manifest ischemic strokewithin 48 hours after TAVINumber (incidence) of clinically manifest ischemic stroke
Change in secondary brain atrophy at 3-months follow-upat baseline and at 3-months follow-upSecondary brain atrophy at 3-months follow-up related to the gradual cellular loss as measured by high resolution 3D T1-weighted MR images (defined as the difference between the brain volumes)
Change in secondary infarct growth at 3-months follow-up (defined as the difference between the infarct volumes)at day 4 and at 3-monthsChange in secondary infarct growth at 3-months follow-up (defined as the difference between the infarct volumes)
Total brain damage (defined as the sum of secondary brain atrophy and final infarct volume)at 3 monthsTotal brain damage (defined as the sum of secondary brain atrophy and final infarct volume)
Change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS)at baseline and at 3-months follow-upThe NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between a 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that specific ability, while a higher score is indicative of some level of impairment. The individual scores from each item are summed in order to calculate a patient's total NIHSS score. The maximum possible score is 42, with the minimum score being a 0.
Change in modified Rankin scaleat baseline and at 3-months follow-upChange in modified Rankin scale; scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health (0) without symptoms to death (6)
Change in trail making testat baseline and at 3-months follow-upChange in trail making test; scoring is based on time taken to complete the test (e.g. 35 seconds yielding a score of 35) with lower scores being better.
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MOCA)at baseline and at 3-months follow-upMontreal Cognitive Assessment test scores range between 0 and 30. A score of 26 or over is considered to be normal
Incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria (any stage)within 3 days after TAVIIncidence of AKI defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria (any stage)
Peak increase of urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL)within 48 hours after TAVIPeak increase of urinary NGAL (surrogate marker of acute renal injury)
Incidence of significant increase in serum cystatin C (>10%)within 48 hours after TAVIIncidence of significant increase in serum cystatin C (\>10%)

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMichael Osthoff, Prof. Dr. med.

University Hospital Basel, Division of Internal Medicine

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRaban Jeger, Prof. Dr. med.

Stadtspital Triemli Zürich, Division of Cardiology

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026