Skip to content

Efficacy of Intercostal CryoAnalgesia in Robotic Lung Resection

Efficacy of Intercostal CryoAnalgesia in Patients Undergoing Robot Assisted Anatomic Lung Resection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05144828
Enrollment
33
Registered
2021-12-03
Start date
2022-02-15
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2026-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Diseases, Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

Atricure, CryoNB, cryoanalgesia, Medical College of Wisconsin

Brief summary

This is a single center, single surgeon, prospective, randomized trial examining the addition of Cryo Nerve Block during robot assisted thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection surgery

Detailed description

Thoracic surgical procedures are consistently reported to be among the most painful surgical incisions currently used. Trauma to the skin, muscle, intercostal nerves, bones and pleura all contribute and lead to activation of various pain pathways including somatic, visceral, neurogenic and phrenic. In the short term, this pain leads to ineffective cough and pulmonary hygiene resulting in respiratory complications and prolonged hospital stays while in the longer term it leads to prolonged recovery, delayed return to work and in some instances, chronic post thoracotomy pain syndromes. Minimally invasive approaches such as standard thoracoscopy or robotic assisted thoracoscopy have certainly decreased some of this trauma as evidenced by decreased length of stays and decreased complication rates however even with these minimally invasive techniques, recovery to 80% of baseline is 25 days and 9.4% of patients are still using narcotics after 90-180 days. Several options are available in the management of pain following thoracic surgery with a multimodal pain medicine approach being most common. Opioids, unfortunately, are a relatively large part of this approach and are often relied upon despite their relatively unfavorable adverse event profile and risk for addiction. Many of the other pain adjuncts often used with thoracotomies such as epidural catheters or intraoperatively placed pain catheters are not really reasonable when using minimally invasive approaches as the hospital length of stay is 1-2 days. Intercostal cryoanalgesia has been shown to be a safe and effective strategy for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing thoracotomy. Recent studies have demonstrated the beneficial effect of cryoanalgesia for post-thoracotomy pain in reduction of opioid requirement, reduction in post-operative pain scores, and superior pulmonary function (higher FEV1 and FVC values)5 and that it can produce temporary neurolysis for up to two months without long-term histological nerve damage. To date it has not been studied when using minimally invasive techniques whether it be standard thoracoscopy or robotic assisted thoracoscopy but it would stand to reason that it would be equally or maybe more effective in this patient population and truly maximize the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. We therefore propose to assess whether intra-operative intercostal cryoanalgesia using the cryoICE® probe provides superior post-operative analgesia as compared to our current standard pain management strategy in patients undergoing robotic assisted thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection and allows for decreased opioid use and more rapid recovery.

Interventions

Patients will receive intraoperative intercostal nerve cryoablation using CryoICE® CRYOS-L cryoablation probes (AtriCure, Inc) to intercostal spaces 4th to 10th in thoracoabdominal aortic repairs and 4th to 8th in descending thoracic aortic repair cases prior to wound closure.

Patients will have access to the standard PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) offered at Froedtert Hospital. This includes tylenol 650 mg oral, robaxin 500 mg oral, and tramadol 25-50 mg oral. All patients will have the first two ports placed at which time an intercostal nerve block of nerves 4-9 will be performed using 0.5% Marcaine with Epinephrine.

Sponsors

Medical College of Wisconsin
Lead SponsorOTHER
AtriCure, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18-85 years of age * Acceptable surgical candidate * Willing and able to return for scheduled follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing or requiring conversion to thoracotomy * Patients with chronic pain syndromes requiring treatment within the last year * Patients with a history of illicit drug use * Patients with a history of heavy alcohol use in the last five years as determined by the principal investigator * Patients currently using opioids

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score14 Days post-operatively, day 30, day 60, day 90, day 120, day 150, day 180The visual analogue scale is a pain assessment tool intended to help patient care providers assess pain according to individual patient needs. A 0-10 scale is used for patient self-assessment with 0 meaning no pain and 10 meaning worst possible pain.
Pain Medication Use21 Days post-operativelyPatients will be asked about their pain medication use daily for 21 days following surgery. Total mg of postoperative pain medication taken will be collected.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) ScoreScreening, Day 1, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 30, Day 35, Day 42The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) is a multi-symptom patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for clinical and research use. The inventory assesses severity of multiple symptoms and the impact of symptoms on daily functioning during the last 24 hours. The MDASI contains 13 core symptom items that assess the severity of symptoms at their worst in the last 24 hours on a 0-10 numerical rating scale per question, with 0 being "not present" and 10 being "as bad as you can imagine." The mean score symptom severity (of the 13 core symptom items with totals ranging between 0 and 130 per survey) will be calculated based on the sum of each survey, with a higher score indicating a higher severity of symptoms and a lower score indicating a lower severity of symptoms.
Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) ScoreScreening, Day 30, Day 60, Day 180The Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) pain scale is an assessment tool to analyze and classify pain. The primary purpose of this test is to assess whether the pain experienced is predominantly due to nerve damage or not. The LANSS comprises of a 7-item pain scale, including sensory descriptors and items for sensory examination. Each of the 7 items is awarded a number of points, depending on the answer choice. In general, answers like no or that signal normal function are awarded 0 points and those that signal a pain related symptom or sign are awarded a number of points varying from 1 to 5, depending on the severity of the particular sign. The final score ranges from 0 to 24. The interpretation is that patients with scores below 12 are less likely to carry a neuropathic cause for their pain whilst in the case of patients scoring 12 or more, there is a higher chance for the underlying mechanism to be neuropathic.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMario Gasparri, MD

Medical College of Wisconsin

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous65.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
31 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 173 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 16

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 16, 2026