Skip to content

Role of Early Motor Experience in Infants With Down Syndrome

Role of Early Motor Experience in Infants With Down Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05144373
Enrollment
51
Registered
2021-12-03
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2025-08-31
Last updated
2025-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Down Syndrome

Brief summary

Infants with Down syndrome show significant delays and weaknesses in motor, cognitive, and language development compared to typically developing infants. This project aims to examine the developmental cascade effects of specific gross and fine motor experience on motor, cognitive and language development in infants with Down syndrome. We propose that both gross and fine motor experience will facilitate cognitive and language development in infants with Down syndrome, and particularly, fine motor experience will help advance gesture and early words production.

Detailed description

Down syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic condition and causes significant development delays and weaknesses in the motor, cognitive, and language domains. It is important to study these co-occurring developmental challenges and develop effective intervention strategies for positive learning outcomes in multiple domains simultaneously. It was found that motor development is closely associated with cognitive and language development in typically developing infants and advances in motor development have developmental cascade effects on other domains. However, this interrelation has not been studied in infants with DS. Our prior work has shown that gross motor experience through body-weight-supported treadmill stepping leads to an earlier onset of walking and improves subsequent locomotor ability in infants with DS. However, we do not yet know the extent to which this motor experience advances cognitive and language development in infants with DS. Research also suggests that grasping, a major fine motor skill emerging in infancy, provides the needed scaffolding for subsequent gesture and speech production. However, research on grasping and its potential effects on other domains in infants with DS remains scarce. The objectives of this proposal are to understand: the role of (a) specific gross motor experience and (b) specific fine motor experience on the motor, cognitive and language development of infants with DS. Our central hypothesis is that motor (both gross and fine) experience will help advance cognitive and language development in infants with DS. We will recruit 45 infants with DS from the greater Atlanta area and beyond. There will be three groups: (a) gross motor (GM) group (n=15), entering the study at about 10 months of age; (b) gross motor plus fine motor (GM+FM) group (n=15), entering the study at about 10 months; and (c) control group (n=15), entering the study at about 20 months. Aim 1: Determine the effects of gross motor experience on cognitive and language development in infants with DS, comparing the GM and control groups. Only the GM group will receive a home-based, parent-guided practice of treadmill stepping from 10 months of age (T1) until onset of walking. We hypothesize that the GM group will show higher Bayley scores and better gesture and word production at termination of the GM intervention (T3) and five months thereafter (T4) than the control group. Aim 2: Determine the effects of fine motor experience on cognitive and language development in infants with DS who receive the GM intervention, particularly in gesture and word production, comparing the GM and GM+FM groups. Only the GM+FM group will receive fine motor experience in practice of grasping using sticky mittens from 10 months of age for about five months. We hypothesize that the GM+FM group will show further improvements in motor, cognitive and language domains, particularly in gesture and word production, than the GM group at termination of the FM intervention (T2) and again at T3 and T4. Our study will gain an in-depth understanding of the cascading effects of motor experience on cognitive and language development and lay the groundwork for future clinical trials in infants with DS.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALGross motor intervention, gross and fine motor intervention

For gross motor intervention, participants will receive a home-based, parent-administered body-weight supported treadmill intervention from about 10 months of age until walking onset. For gross and fine motor intervention, participants will receive the same treadmill intervention as illustrated above. In addition, participants will receive a fine motor intervention with practice of reaching and grasping using sticky mittens from about 10 months of age for five months.

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Georgia State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

We will recruit 45 infants with DS from the greater Atlanta area and beyond. There will be three groups: (a) gross motor (GM) group (n=15), entering the study at about 10 months of age; (b) gross motor plus fine motor (GM+FM) group (n=15), entering the study at about 10 months; and (c) control group (n=15), entering the study at about 20 months. The GM group will receive a home-based, parent-guided practice of treadmill stepping from 10 months of age until walking onset. The GM+FM group will receive both treadmill intervention from 10 months of age until walking onset as well as fine motor experience in practice of grasping using sticky mittens from 10 months of age for about five months. The control group will not receive an intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Months to 36 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* An appropriate age range of 7-36 months * A diagnosis of Down syndrome.

Exclusion criteria

* The presence of seizure disorders * Non-correctable vision, hearing and heart problems * Any other severe medical conditions that may prevent the infant from participating in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bayley cognitive scores10 months for GM and GM+FM groupsThe Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development cognitive composite scores
Bayley language scores10 months for GM and GM+FM groupsThe Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development language composite scores
Gesture production10 months for GM and GM+FM groupsIt measures the type, frequency, and quality of gestures that the infant produces during infant-parent interaction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bayley motor scores10 months for GM and GM+FM groupsThe Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development motor composite scores

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026