Skip to content

Insignia™ Hip Stem Outcomes Study

Insignia™ Hip Stem Outcomes Study - A Prospective, Post-market, Multi-center Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes of the Insignia™ Hip Stem for Total Hip Replacement Surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05144191
Enrollment
313
Registered
2021-12-03
Start date
2022-02-07
Completion date
2034-04-02
Last updated
2026-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Avascular Necrosis, Femoral Neck Fractures, Hip Osteoarthritis, Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Surgery, Trochanteric Fractures

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Insignia™ Hip Stem for global market access and post-market clinical follow-up up to 10 years postoperative.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective, post-market, multi-center clinical investigation of the Insignia™ Hip Stem for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a consecutive series of patients who meet the eligibility criteria. The total enrollment goal for the study is a minimum of 313 cases, all of which will receive the Insignia™ Hip Stem.

Interventions

DEVICEInsignia uncemented Hip Stem

Device: Replacement of arthritic hip with Insignia uncemented Hip Stem

Sponsors

Stryker Orthopaedics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The subject has signed an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, study specific Informed Consent Form (ICF). * The subject is skeletally mature * The subject has a diagnosis as listed in the instructions for use (IFU), which include non inflammatory degenerative joint disease (including osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis), rheumatoid arthritis or post-traumatic arthritis, correction of functional deformity, treatment of nonunion, femoral neck and trochanteric fractures. * The subject is a candidate for a primary or revision cementless THA. * The subject is willing and able to comply with postoperative scheduled clinical evaluations.

Exclusion criteria

* The subject is pregnant or breastfeeding * The subject has an active or suspected latent infection in or about the affected hip joint at the time of study device implantation. * The subject has any mental or neuromuscular disorder which would create an unacceptable risk of prosthesis instability, prosthesis fixation failure, or complications in postoperative care. * The subject has bone stock compromised by disease, infection or prior implantation which cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation to the prosthesis. * The subject is immunologically suppressed or receiving steroids in excess of normal physiological requirements (e.g. \> 30 days). * The subject has a known sensitivity to device materials. * The subject is involved in any ongoing legal matter, investigation, or dispute pertaining to the operative site. * The subject is a prisoner.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival Rate10 yearsEvaluation of the survival rate for Insignia Hip Stem is defined as absence of femoral stem revision for aseptic loosening or device-related femoral fracture.
Harris Hip Score (HHS)10 YearsThe Harris Hip Score (HHS) assesses pain, function, joint deformity and range of motion. Scores can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best score. A score of 80-100 is considered good-excellent and a score of less than or equal to 79 is considered fair-poor. 90-100 = excellent 80-89 = good 70-79 = fair 0-69 = poor

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Harris Hip Score (HHS)pre-op, 6 week, 1,2,5 and 7 yearsThe Harris Hip Score (HHS) assesses pain, function, joint deformity and range of motion. Scores can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best score. A score of 80-100 is considered good-excellent and a score of less than or equal to 79 is considered fair-poor. 90-100 = excellent 80-89 = good 70-79 = fair 0-69 = poor
EQ-5D - Descriptive Systempre-op, 6 week, 1,2,3, 4,5,7 and 10 yearsThe EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) is a subject-completed questionnaire designed to assess subject health state values. The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility self care, usual activities, pain/comfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels indicating no problems, some problems or extreme problems. The index values on a scale between -1 (low) and 1 (high) are showing the average health status according to the 5 dimensions: A low score shows worse health and a high score shows better health.
EQ-5D - Visual analogue scale (VAS)pre-op, 6 week, 1,2,3, 4,5,7 and 10 yearsThe EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) is a subject-completed questionnaire designed to assess subject health state values. With the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) the respondents can report their perceived health status with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).
Survival Rate2 yearsEvaluation of the survival rate for Insignia™ Hip Stem is defined as absence of femoral stem revision for aseptic loosening or device-related femoral fracture Success rate at two (2) years postoperative with the Insignia™ Hip Stem is not worse than 98 % with a non-inferiority margin of 3.5%. Success rate at 10 years postoperative with the Insignia™ Hip Stem is not worse than 95% with a non-inferiority margin of 5%.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 19, 2026