Skip to content

Extension Study to PTR-01-002 (A Study in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB) Patients Previously Treated With PTR-01)

A Phase 2b Open-Label Study of PTR-01 in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB) Patients Previously Treated With PTR-01 in Study PTR-01-002

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05143190
Enrollment
2
Registered
2021-12-03
Start date
2021-12-02
Completion date
2022-08-09
Last updated
2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Keywords

Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa, Epidermolysis Bullosa, RDEB, EB

Brief summary

A sub-set of patients who participated in PTR-01-002 will be enrolled in an open-label study, if they meet the study eligibility criteria.

Detailed description

Protocol PTR-01-003 is a 4-part Phase 2, open-label study of PTR-01 in patients who satisfactorily completed study PTR-01-002 and meet current enrollment criteria. In Part 1, patients will be monitored monthly for up to 2 months with patient-reported and Investigator assessments. In Part 2, patients will receive a dose of 3.0 mg/kg every week for a total of 4 doses. This will be followed by Part 3 in which patients will receive a dose of 3.0 mg/kg monthly for a total of 5 additional doses. At the end of each dosing period, efficacy assessments will be performed. During Part 4, patients will be evaluated at Months 1 and 3 after completion of dosing to assess the durability of wound healing and other efficacy parameters. Safety will be assessed continuously throughout the study.

Interventions

DRUGPTR-01

Intravenous recombinant collagen 7

Sponsors

Phoenix Tissue Repair, a BridgeBio company
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Phoenix Tissue Repair, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Open-label

Intervention model description

Phase 2 open-label

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Willing to provide informed consent form, or if 12 to \<18 years of age, legal guardian has provided informed consent form and the minor has signed an assent form acknowledging that they understand and agree to study procedures. 2. Has satisfactorily completed participation in PTR-01-002. 3. Agrees to use contraception as follows: * For women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) agrees to use highly effective contraceptive (including abstinence) methods from Screening, through the study, and for at least 10 weeks after the last dose of study drug. Non-childbearing potential is defined as a female who meets either of the following criteria: age ≥50 years and no menses for at least 1 year or documented hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy. * For males, agrees to use a condom with any WOCBP sexual partner from Day 1 of study treatment, through the study, and at least 10 weeks after the last dose of study drug. 4. Be willing and able to comply with this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

1. Has known systemic hypersensitivity to any of the inactive ingredients in PTR-01. 2. Has previously had an anaphylactic reaction to PTR-01. 3. Is pregnant or nursing. 4. Has received in the last six months any investigational gene therapy product or in the last three months any non-gene therapy investigational products (other than PTR-01). 5. Is anticipated to receive new regimens of antibiotics or other anti-infectives during the trial. 6. Has any other medical or personal condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may potentially compromise the safety or compliance of the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sustained wound healingUp to 246 daysChange in a majority of target lesions of at least 2 levels using a 7-point (1-7) Global Impression of Change instrument (7 being the worst)
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse eventsUp to 246 daysSafety and tolerability, as assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in wound surface areaUp to 246 daysWound surface area of lesions as assessed by medical photography using the Canfield RUBI 3D imaging system
Change in skin integrity, as assessed by suction blister timeUp to 246 daysChange in skin integrity, as assessed by suction blister time
Change in skin integrity, as assessed by time to re-blisteringUp to 246 daysChange in skin integrity, as assessed by time to re-blistering
Change in itch severity, as assessed by modified Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) itch domainsUp to 246 daysSeverity of itch, as assessed by modified Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) itch domains, maximum score of 5 (worst)
Change in the impact of itch on quality of lifeUp to 246 daysChange in the impact of itch on quality of life, as assessed by the Pruritus-Specific Quality of Life Instrument (ItchyQoL), maximum score of 110 (worst)
Change of dysphagia, as assessed using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia QuestionnaireUp to 246 daysChange of dysphagia, as assessed using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire, maximum score is 40 (worst)
Change in pain severity, as assessed by modified Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain domainsUp to 246 daysChange in pain severity, as assessed by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain domains, maximum score of 5 (worst)
Change in pain severity, as assessed by the Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes for Research of Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB)Up to 246 daysChange in pain severity, as assessed by the Instrument for Scoring Clinical, maximum score of 234 (worst)
Stabilization of dysphagia, as assessed using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia InstrumentUp to 246 daysStabilization of dysphagia, as assessed using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Instrument, maximum score of 40 (worst)
Change in corneal symptomsUp to 246 daysChange of corneal symptoms (eye symptoms), as assessed by the Epidermolysis Bullosa Eye Disease Index (EB-EDI), maximum score of 100 (worst)
Stabilization of corneal symptomsUp to 246 daysStabilization of corneal symptoms (eye symptoms), as assessed by the Epidermolysis Bullosa Eye Disease Index (EB-EDI), maximum score of 100 (worst)
Rate of change in nutritional markers (hemoglobin)Up to 246 daysChange of nutritional markers, as assessed by hemoglobin
Rate of change in nutritional markers (hematocrit)Up to 246 daysChange of nutritional markers, as assessed by hematocrit
Rate of change in nutritional markers (total protein/albumin)Up to 246 daysChange of nutritional markers, as assessed by total protein/albumin
Rate of change in nutritional markers (Fe/TIBC)Up to 246 daysChange of nutritional markers, as assessed by total Fe/TIBC
Rate of change in nutritional markers (C-reactive protein)Up to 246 daysChange of nutritional markers, as assessed by total C-reactive protein
Delivery of recombinant collagen 7 (PTR-01) to skinUp to 246 daysAmount of recombinant collagen 7 (PTR-01) incorporation to skin as compared to normal human skin assessed by immunofluorescence using NC1 & NC2 antibody staining
Change in Investigator Patient Impressions of Change (PGIC)Up to 246 daysGlobal impressions of change, as assessed through PGIC (1-7), 7 being worst
Change in overall quality of life, as assessed by the Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) questionnaireUp to 246 daysChange in overall quality of life, as assessed by the Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) questionnaire maximum score is 67 (worst)
Change in overall healthUp to 246 daysChange in overall disability, as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire or Children's Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ/CHAQ) maximum score is 3 (worst)
Change in mental healthUp to 246 daysChange in mental health, as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) mental health domains, maximum score is 5 (worst)
Change in social functionUp to 246 daysChange in social functioning, as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) social function domains, maximum score is 4 (worst)
Change in amount of wound careUp to 246 daysChange in amount of wound care, as assessed by patient interviews
Change in time for wound careUp to 246 daysChange in time for wound care, as assessed by patient interviews
Change in cost of wound careUp to 246 daysChange in cost of wound care, as assessed by patient interviews
Change in overall patient impression of quality of lifeUp to 246 daysChange in overall anecdotal quality of life, as assessed by one-on-one patient interviews
Change in overall patient impression of disabilityUp to 246 daysChange in overall anecdotal disability, as assessed by one-on-one patient interviews
Effect of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) on pharmacokinetics parameter CmaxUp to 246 daysCorrelate ADA with Cmax
Effect of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) on pharmacokinetics parameter TmaxUp to 246 daysCorrelate ADA with Tmax
Effect of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) on pharmacokinetics parameter Area Under the Curve (AUC)Up to 246 daysCorrelate ADA with Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Effect of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) on pharmacokinetics parameter of clearance of PTR-01Up to 246 daysCorrelate ADA with clearance of PTR-01
Effect of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) on pharmacokinetics parameter of PTR-01 half-lifeUp to 246 daysCorrelate ADA with PTR-01 half-life
Change in Investigator Global Impressions of Change (IGIC)Up to 246 daysGlobal impressions of change, as assessed through IGIC (1-7), 7 being worst
Formation of anchoring fibrilsUp to 246 daysFormation of new anchoring fibrils as measured by electron microscopy

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026