Skip to content

Feasibility Test of Virtual Reality Obstacle Detection for Low Vision Walking

Monocular Visual Confusion for Field Expansion

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05141604
Enrollment
15
Registered
2021-12-02
Start date
2022-05-17
Completion date
2027-05-31
Last updated
2026-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemianopsia, Homonymous Hemianopia, Tunnel Vision, Visual Field Constriction Bilateral, Visual Field Defect Homonymous Bilateral, Visual Field Defect, Peripheral

Keywords

walking, collision, field expansion, visual field loss

Brief summary

The investigators are developing a new test of pedestrian hazard detection in virtual reality (VR) head-mounted display (HMD) headset, which shows virtual oncoming pedestrians in 3D while subjects are walking in real-world environment, for evaluation of visual field expansion to improve mobility in people with visual field loss.

Detailed description

The investigators will develop a new pedestrian hazard detection test and conduct a single arm interventional clinical trial to evaluate simulated low vision assistive devices in a sample of field loss subjects. Pedestrian detection performance with and without field expansion information will be tested and compared. The study will include 1 to 4 visits (each 2 to 4 hours) depending on the number of trials and experimental conditions (e.g., with and without simulated assistive devices) the subject is comfortable completing. The time between visits may vary depending on scheduling constraints and availability. During each visit, the subject will complete a series of simulated collision avoidance trials in VR requiring the detection and natural avoidance of a colliding pedestrian (alongside non-colliding pedestrians) while physically walking through an empty corridor. The study will be considered minimal-risk since there will be no physical obstacles that present actual collision risks.

Interventions

OTHERField expansion view

Overlaid small window on HMD to show the part of the scene in the blind field into portions of the participants' remaining, seeing, field of vision

Sponsors

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Eye Institute (NEI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least 14 years of age (no upper age limit) * In sufficiently good health to be able to complete sessions lasting 2-3 hours * Able to understand English * Able to give voluntary, informed consent * Able to independently move short distances * Binocular vision parameters within normal limits (Stereopsis ≤ 100 arc sec on any stereo test) * Visual field loss, either peripheral field loss (\<30 degrees diameter) or hemianopic field loss (blind in half of visual field) * Better than 20/100 visual acuity in the worse eye

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with any self-reported physical or mental disabilities, including cognitive dysfunction, balance problems, or other deficits that could impair their ability to respond to the stimuli presented in this study * Any person with a self-reported medical history (such as pacemaker use or photosensitive epilepsy) or physical condition listed on the device manual of the Oculus / HMD system used for the experiment as a contraindication * Any self-reported history of seizures (any type) in the last 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response timeThrough study completion, an average of four monthsDuring the pedestrian detection task, average response time to the colliding pedestrian with and without prisms

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Head movement rangeThrough study completion, an average of four monthsDuring the pedestrian detection task, lateral and vertical head movement range to check the head scanning range
Walking speedThrough study completion, an average of four monthsDuring the pedestrian detection task, the physical walking speed of the subject
Pedestrian detection rateThrough study completion, an average of four monthsProportion of simulated pedestrians detected (in HMD walking)
Error rateThrough study completion, an average of four monthsProportion of false alarms and missed targets to total targets

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREli Peli, OD, MSc

Senior Scientist

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026