Skip to content

Mobile Electrocardiogram Monitoring for Detecting Arrhythmias in Children

Effectiveness of Mobile Electrocardiogram Monitoring for Detecting Arrhythmias in Children With Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05140343
Enrollment
84
Registered
2021-12-01
Start date
2021-04-07
Completion date
2024-08-30
Last updated
2023-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Children, Only, Congenital Heart Disease, Diagnoses Disease, Sudden Cardiac Death

Keywords

grown ups with congenital heart (GUCH) disease, pediatric cardiology, diagnosis of arrhythmia, new diagnostic tools, early diagnosis, prevention

Brief summary

The objective of this project is to evaluate the capability of a specific mobile electrocardiogram monitoring of detecting arrhythmic events in children with history of palpitation and or syncope. We will compare this approach with the standard approach of clinical follow-up plus 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring in terms of acceptability and ability to identify significant arrhythmias.

Detailed description

Syncope and palpitation are one of the most common referrals to pediatric cardiology in patients with and without structural heart disease. In children with palpitation supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is the most common final diagnosis. While some SVTs caused by the presence of an accessory pathway are highly recommend to be treated, other forms of arrhythmia are rarely life threatening and therapy depends on the burden of symptoms. Some SVT can be the first manifestation of an underlying heart disease. Early onset of atrial fibrillation, for example, in childhood usually reveals a genetic pathology and therefore needs further investigation. Besides the need for precise diagnosis to choose adequate management and therapy, unrecognized paroxysmal SVT have shown to lead to misdiagnosis mimicking symptoms of a psychiatric disorder. However, with the current diagnostic tools and protocols in only 10 % to 15 % of children with palpitation an underlying arrhythmia is found. Syncope commonly is of benign character in children but it can be the first warning sign of a serious condition. Despite considerable testing and expense accurate diagnosis of the underlying cause of syncope is still challenging. The theoretical possibility of an underlying fatal arrhythmia adds remarkable to the mental health challenges of adolescence and the families. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a rare but devastating event in children and adolescents. Syncope and palpitation deserve even higher attention in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). These patients have an overall higher risk of developing cardiac arrhythmias as consequence of the pre-existing anatomical alterations, as well as the surgical treatment necessary for its correction. In many cases arrhythmia occur earlier in life and sometimes SCD is the first symptom of manifestation. To study the origin of palpitation and syncope 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and 24-hours Holter monitoring is typically performed. In case of high clinical suspicion, implantable loop-recorder and electrophysiological study can be performed to finally reach a diagnosis. However, it is an invasive test that is thought to be avoided in children if possible and might be poorly tolerated in patients with CHD. In recent years, technological development has allowed the validation of different tools for detection of arrhythmias by smart devices. The KARDIA Mobile Cardiac Monitor is a handheld ECG device that enables users to collect and store single-channel ECG recordings using the smart phone, smart watch, or tablet. A recent study has demonstrated the efficacy of this device in the early diagnosis of arrhythmic disorders in adults by performing ECGs twice weekly plus additional ECG if symptomatic. However, its utility for the early detection and diagnosis of arrhythmias in children and patients with a CHD, which have a different normal physiology of the heart rhythm, has not yet been studied.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTKARDIA Mobile ECG Monitoring (KMCM)

The KMCM will be introduced to the patient of the KMCM arm in the outpatient clinic. The activation and configuration will be done together with the physician in the outpatient clinic (installation of the ECG app, enabling heart rate rhythm notification). Patients are requested to acquired ECGs twice weekly plus additional ECGs if symptomatic. In case of symptoms the patient is asked to generate an ECG and communicate the event timely to the investigator and to the treating physician by sending a report through the ECG app. An e-mail account created for the study will be checked at least once a day. The arrhythmia diagnosis will be performed by the clinician based on the ECG information, independently of the arrhythmia classification automatically performed by the device. In case of stronger symptoms of any kind at any time the patient is asked to request medical help regardless of the KMCM notifications. Change of management will be collected.

Sponsors

Centro Medico Teknon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 5-18 years old with or without the diagnosis of structural heart disease and symptoms suggestive of rhythm disorders as follows: palpitations and/or syncope and/or dizziness. * 24-hours Holter without diagnosis of arrhythmia. * Having an smart phone, smart watch, or tablet (the patient itself or a family member who lives together with the patient) compatible with KARDIA mobile ECG monitoring. * Signed informed consent. In cases under the age of \<18 y.o informed consent should be signed by parents or guardians.

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant investigation treatments. * Being already diagnosed for arrhythmic events. * Medical, geographical and social factors that make study participation impractical, and inability to give written informed consent. * Patient's refusal to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to a documented new arrhythmia.12 monthsTime to a documented new arrhythmia counting time from the inclusion date.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of medical request12 monthsRate of patients with changes of diagnostic and/or therapy
Hospitalization during study time.12 monthsNumber of participants hospitalized during study time

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactAntonio Berruezo, MD, PhD
antonio.berruezo@quironsalud.es(+34)932906251

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026