Skip to content

Avoiding Low-value Treatments in Older Women With Early-stage Breast Cancer: Piloting a Patient Decision Aid

Avoiding Low-value Treatments in Older Women With Early-stage Breast Cancer: Piloting a Patient Decision Aid

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05140252
Enrollment
22
Registered
2021-12-01
Start date
2022-05-12
Completion date
2023-09-14
Last updated
2023-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

de-implementation strategies

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to learn whether participants find a patient guide to breast cancer treatment decisions acceptable and appropriate for use.

Detailed description

This study seeks to adapt and pilot test de-implementation strategies targeting low-value breast cancer treatments which have persisted despite national recommendations. Breast cancer is an ideal setting in which to study de-implementation given it is common, well-studied, typically presents at an early-stage, and care is provided primarily in a community setting.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBreast cancer decision aid

The decision aid is tailored from a previously published aid, specific to women ≥70 with early-stage breast cancer. The aid will be delivered via mail or electronically per patient preference before the patient's initial appointment with a surgeon.

Sponsors

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Early stage breast cancer that is hormone receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor negative (HER2-) * Meet criteria for omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) * Receiving care at Michigan Medicine

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English speaking * Male patients (current data does not support omission of SLNB in men)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability of Intervention (AIM) Survey1 week after receiving decision aidAIM is a validated, 4-item survey with all items measured on a 5-point Likert scale (Completely Disagree \[1\] - Completely Agree \[5\]), scored as a mean. The median score across all participants will be reported.
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)1 week after receiving decision aidIAM is a validated, 4-item survey with all items measured on a 5-point Likert scale (Completely Disagree \[1\] - Completely Agree \[5\]), scored as a mean. The median score across all participants will be reported.
Engagement with the patient decision aid1 week after receiving decision aidTo determine feasibility, participants will be asked whether they engaged with the patient decision aid (1=thoroughly, 2=somewhat or 3=not at all), scored as a mean. The median score across all participants will be reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction with decision (SWD)up to 120-days following surgeryThe SWD survey will be administered by telephone between 60- and 120-days following surgery. SWD is a validated, 6-item survey with all items measured on a 5-point Likert scale (Completely Disagree \[1\] - Completely Agree \[5\]), scored as a mean. The median score across all participants will be reported.
Treatment choice90 days after surgeryThe research team will access participants electronic medical records to determine the number of participants who underwent SLNB, radiation treatment, both or neither after surgery. This will be reported in 4 categories: Only SLNB, Only Radiation, Both or Neither.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026