Skip to content

Aminoacidemia and Protein Kinetics in Response to the Ingestion of Plant-based Protein Blends

Aminoacidemia and Protein Kinetics in Response to the Ingestion of Plant-based Protein Blends

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05139160
Acronym
PBP
Enrollment
8
Registered
2021-12-01
Start date
2022-08-15
Completion date
2025-07-10
Last updated
2024-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nutrition, Healthy

Keywords

plant-based protein, whey protein, protein quality, muscle protein synthesis

Brief summary

The present investigation aims to study a novel plant based protein isolate blend to determine if it results in similar muscle building responses compared to whey protein isolate.

Detailed description

Whey protein is considered the 'gold standard' to maintain body proteins (muscle, skin, bone). When isolated from milk, whey protein isolate (WPI) contains all nine essential amino acids (EAA) which are 'building blocks' that are needed to support the maintenance of body proteins. To date, there is no plant-based protein (PBP) isolate that compares to the recommended WPI towards how our body builds or supports our muscles. WPI is considered the 'gold standard' because it contains all of the EAA which provide the right amount of 'building blocks' to support our muscles. Current PBP isolates available contain insufficient amounts of EAA, and are less digestible, resulting in less 'building blocks' available to support our muscles. Recently, plant protein combinations have been designed to provide the right amounts of all the EAAs. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to determine the effects of a novel PBP blend on muscle protein synthesis responses by comparing it to WPI.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTProtein quality

the present investigation aims to study a novel protein based protein isolate blend with and without leucine an compared with whey protein isolate to determine its impact aminoacidemia and muscle protein synthesis healthy adults.

Sponsors

McMaster University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

The study design will be a randomized, double blind, crossover trial.

Intervention model description

The study design will be a randomized, double blind, crossover trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female, between the ages of 18 - 30 years (inclusive) 2. Have a body mass index (BMI) between 18-30 kg·m2 (inclusive) 3. Be in general good health as assessed by a general health questionnaire 4. Non-smoking 5. Regular menstrual cycle and not using hormonal contraceptives 6. Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Currently using analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs 2. A history of neuromuscular problems or muscle and/or bone wasting diseases 3. Any acute or chronic illness, metabolic disorders 4. Currently using corticosteroids 5. Use of hormonal contraceptives or anabolic steroids (e.g. testosterone)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle protein synthesisOver a 5 hour periodA marker of muscle growth

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AminoacidemiaOver a 5 hour periodAmino acids in the blood
Appetite and desire for specific food types in response to test drinks types HImmediately before, and 30, 60, 120, 180 and 300 minutes after test drinks are consumed.Questionnaire on appetite and palpability of the drinks assessed by a visual analogue scale. 100 mm in length with words anchored at each end, expressing the most positive and the most negative rating used to assess hunger, satiety and fullness. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Palatability of test drinksImmediately after test drink are consumed.Questionnaire of palatability of test drinks assessed by a visual analogue scale. 100 mm in length with words anchored at each end, expressing the most positive and the most negative rating used to assess visual appeal, smell, taste, aftertaste and palatability. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Questionnaire on safetyOver a 5 hour periodSafety will be measured via a questionnaire; e.g. can the participant drink the test drinks and are they okay? Yes or no.
Tolerability of test drinksOver a 5 hour periodTolerability will be measured using Visual Analog Scales anchored by the following descriptors: 0 - no symptoms at all; 100 - worst symptoms participant has ever experienced for the following: nausea, belching, feeling of fullness, vomiting, abdominal distension, flatulence, diarrhoea, dry mouth, and thirst.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026