Skip to content

Effect of Spinal Manipulation on Electromyography of the Masseter Muscle

Immediate Effect of High Speed and Low Amplitude Cervical Manipulation on the Electromyographic Activity of the Masseter Muscle, in a Physiotherapy Students at the University of the Americas. a Clinical Trial, Single Blind

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05138926
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-12-01
Start date
2021-08-11
Completion date
2021-11-11
Last updated
2021-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bruxism, Muscle Disorder

Brief summary

Research Problem: To know the immediate effects of high speed and low amplitude cervical manipulation on the electromyographic activity of the masseter muscles of physiotherapy students at the University of the Americas Course objective: To compare the immediate effects of high-speed, low-amplitude cervical manipulation on the electromyographic activity of the masseter muscles versus a placebo intervention in kinesiology students at the University of the Americas. Specific objectives: To describe the changes in the electromyographic activity of the masseter muscles of the high-speed cervical manipulation group in students of the physiotherapy school of the University of the Americas of the Santiago Centro campus. To describe the changes in the electromyographic activity of the masseter muscles of the placebo group in students of the physiotherapy school of the University of the Americas of the Santiago Centro campus. Methodology: Single-blind, randomized clinical trial. Expected results: Significant differences are expected between the intervention group and the control group. This is reflected in a decrease in electromyographic activity in the masseter muscles after high-speed cervical manipulation.

Interventions

high speed, low amplitude cervical manipulation

Cervical mobilization without performing spinal manipulation

Sponsors

University of Americas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female physiotherapy students over 18 years of age who regularly attend face-to-face classes who have a mobility pass and a health declaration. * Students who read and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Orthognathic surgery. * Recent head and neck injury or fracture (equal to or less than 3 months) * Dental or medical diagnosis of mandibular disorder or manifest facial pain. * Contraindication (red flag) to perform high speed and low amplitude cervical manipulation (bone cancer, osteoporosis, vertebral artery injury, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Electromyography of the masseter muscle before interventionbaselinesurface electromyography of the masseter muscle, measured in millivolts (mV)
Electromyography of the masseter muscle after the intervention5 minute after interventionsurface electromyography of the masseter muscle, measured in millivolts (mV)

Countries

Chile

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026