Skip to content

A Pragmatic Approach to CKD Patient Education

A Pragmatic Approach to Chronic Kidney Disease Patient Education in the Delta

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05138419
Acronym
PACED
Enrollment
1
Registered
2021-12-01
Start date
2023-02-13
Completion date
2024-10-23
Last updated
2026-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease stage3, Chronic Kidney Disease stage4, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5, Patient Engagement

Keywords

Patient Education, Patient Engagement, Chronic Kidney Disease

Brief summary

Over 350,000 adult Arkansans have chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 9 out of 10 (312,000) of these Arkansans are unaware of having it. A Know Your Kidney Number (eGFR) poster (KYKN) campaign is being launched statewide to increase CKD awareness and detection. As awareness increases, the demand for patient education will increase. Educating patients has proven to be effective in delaying CKD progression and establishing optimal renal replacement therapy (RRT) when needed. CKD patient education has historically been provided by nephrology clinicians. Yet most patients are not referred to nephrology until the patient is nearing the need for RRT. Novel pragmatic approaches to reaching and educating patients earlier in their disease state and partnering with a broader pool of clinicians that can provide the education is needed. Most problems related to CKD start when kidney function is \ 45 %, earlier education can empower patients to make changes to protect their kidney function earlier and plan for RRT. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) developed and copyrighted the CKD: What You Need to Know patient education system. Research showed almost 90% of the attendees could choose a modality after either tele-education (TE) or face to face (FTF) education. Home modality choices doubled. Patients were able to make informed choices regardless of the modality of education. Of those starting RRT 47% started on a home modality or received a transplant. This compares to 10% nationally. Both transplant and home dialysis have better outcomes and are less costly compared to in-center hemodialysis. Harp's Pharmacy has a successful medication therapy management (MTM) program where pharmacists are provided time for patient-centered activities for patients with diabetes (DM), hypertension (HTN), the 2 leading causes for CKD, and heart failure (HF), the leading cause of death in CKD. Thirty six percent of patients with DM will develop CKD and hypertension can be both a cause and an effect of CKD. In this project Harp's Pharmacy will use the MTM infrastructure to add CKD to the program in select pharmacies in the delta. The CKD tools build on and support actions that improve the underlying conditions that are already being addressed. The CKD: What You Need to Know tools will be used with patients with known CKD or 2 of the 3 conditions covered by MTM and randomized into 1 of 2 education arms that offer various levels of support or a control arm.

Detailed description

Using non-nephrology clinicians to expand access to CKD education earlier in the patient's disease progress is essential. This project will inform how various levels of support provided by pharmacists and staff using nephrology developed tools in self-study models can 1) effect patient's ability to select the End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) modality (Incenter hemodialysis, home hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, no dialysis or do not have enough information to make a choice) to use if or when dialysis is needed 2) identify patient's interest in obtaining a renal transplant and, if so, has a possible donor been identified 3) identify actions they are willing to take to protect their current kidney function using a CKD Action Plan that contains 1 knowledge goal and 10 performance goals based on international guidelines 4) allow comparisons of support time and outcomes for each of the 3 groups. Empowering patients to be proactive partners in their health care, through education and accountability, by choosing both the RRT and performance goals to protect the patient's kidneys is key to improving outcomes. Demonstrating that non-nephrology clinicians can effectively educate and support these patients will provide models that other clinicians can use. Minorities, especially in rural areas, are less likely to receive most kinds of care including evidence-based practices, home dialysis or transplantation. Developing patient-centered approaches to care such as this project can reduce disparities. One-on-one outreach to educate, motivate and seek the patient's feedback can strengthen commitment and adherence to medical regimens. Learning what to expect can promote self-management behaviors. The Arkansas Department of Health (ADH) Southeast (SE) region covers most of the Delta and was selected because the SE region had the poorest outcomes for patients starting RRT. In 2017, new patients were predominately black (61%), less than half had seen a nephrologist prior to starting RRT, only 1.3% had seen a dietitian, most (92.3%) started hemodialysis using a catheter and 2.1% started on home peritoneal dialysis. Only 2.1% had no insurance. This data can be tracked annually to track impact. The tools being used were developed by a multidisciplinary team of nephrology experts which are limited in the delta. Courses including train the trainer classes for pharmacies and 10 points of Care for CKD for clinicians will be conducted. Collaboration with local providers can both educate and promote community engagement. Harp pharmacists expressed randomization concerns. Harp's Pharmacy reported that many of the MTM subjects have multiple family members or friends enrolled in the study. This could confound randomization into various arms since these subjects are highly likely to compare and contrast the details of the patient's intervention. The research team decided that a cluster randomization schedule would be utilized with each cluster self-selecting a leader that would be enrolled in the study and be responsible for the education of the other cluster members. All cluster members will undergo the same testing.

Interventions

OTHERCKD What You Need To Know Workbook System

139 page Workbook including CKD Action Plan, Web-Based Resources, Interactive CKD Patient education material

OTHERCKD Action Plan

Goals based on international guidelines that can protect kidney function (1 knowledge and 10 action goals) Patient education material used separately for control arm.

OTHERCKD Web-based Resource List

CKD Patient education material used separately for control arm

OTHERFood Label reading exercise

CKD Patient education material used separately in all arms.

Sponsors

University of Arkansas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a randomized control pilot study using non-nephrology clinicians to educate patients at high risk for CKD how to protect the kidneys and be ready for RRT if needed utilizing nephrology developed educational tools. Pharmacists screen subjects in the MTM program or with the same medical conditions, enroll them in familial or peer clusters of 1 or more subjects and randomized into 1 of the 3 study arms using a site specific randomization schedule. In clusters of more than 1 subject, the group chooses a leader who receives the assigned intervention and shares it other cluster members. All subjects will receive pre and post testing, health literacy evaluation and completes a program evaluation. The 3 arms include 2 education arms and a control arm with various levels of intervention. The two education arms use the CKD: What You Need to Know Workbook including the CKD AP as self-study tools. The control arm receives the CKD AP and a list of CKD Web-based Resources.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 105 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults (any gender)\>18 years old * Enrolled in Harp's MTM program * Has Known CKD or 2 of the 3 conditions covered in MTM (DM, HTN and Heart Failure) * Not on dialysis

Exclusion criteria

* unable to read or speak English * history of significant cognitive dysfunction unless qualified caregiver is the one being educated * not personally independent or without any social support

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With a Possible Donor Identified (Post-test)after the intervention, up to 4 monthsDescriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend in the subjects' selection of a possible donor based on post-test evaluation form answers.
Number of Subjects Who Can Choose a Dialysis Modality by the End of the Study.up to 4 monthsThis primary study aim is to increase the subject's ability to select a dialysis modality. Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend in the subjects' ability to choose or not choose a dialysis modality. Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend of patients answers based on comparisons of responses on pre and post tests and evaluation form with the options of Incenter Hemodialysis (ICH), Home Hemodialysis (HH), Peritoneal Dialysis (PD), No Dialysis, don't have enough information to make a to make a decision.
Number of Subjects That Choose a Form of Home Dialysis (Home Hemodialysis or Peritoneal Dialysis) by the End of the Study.up to 4 monthsThis aim is to identify the impact interventions have on the subject's choice of modality (home dialysis versus in-center hemodialysis). Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend of patients answers based on comparisons of responses on pre and post tests and evaluation form with the options of Incenter Hemodialysis (ICH), Home Hemodialysis (HH), Peritoneal Dialysis (PD).
Number of Subjects Interested in Kidney Transplant (Pre-test)before implementation of the intervention, average of 1 weekDescriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend in the subjects' level of interest in kidney transplant based on pre-test, post-test and evaluation form answers.
Number of Subjects Interested in Kidney Transplant (Post-test)after the intervention, up to 4 monthsDescriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend in the subjects' level of interest in kidney transplant based on post-test evaluation form answers.
Number of Subjects With a Possible Donor Identified (Pre-test)before implementation of the intervention, average of 1 weekDescriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend in the subjects' selection of a possible donor based on pre-test evaluation form answers.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Engagement (Percent of Applicable Action Plan (AP) Goals Selected)up to 4 monthsPatient Engagement will be measured by the percent of applicable AP goals selected The AP has 10 performance goals that are specific, actionable and realistic addressing these areas 1) Diabetes: Goal Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) 2) B/P Goal 3) Exercise Goal 4) Medications to Avoid, ensure taken, system to reorder 5) Stop Smoking 6-7) Kidney Friendly Diet: salt/water/edema, phosphorus/ protein 8) Monitor System for glucose checks, home blood pressure, weight, diet diary 9) Weight Management 10) Anemia: Goal hemoglobin. When AP is initiated goals already met or are don't apply to subject will be identified. Subject can then select goals to start.
Patient Engagement (Percent of Visits Where a Patient-initiated CKD Discussion Takes Place)up to 4 monthsPatient Engagement will be measured by the percent of visits where a patient-initiated CKD discussion occurred
Patient Engagement (Percent of Goals Met)up to 4 monthsPatient Engagement will be measured by the percent of goals met (self-reported or provider-confirmed). Goal completion will be determined from evaluation form, AP form, or study flow sheet.
Amount of Time Spent by Pharmacist and Staff Per Subjectup to 4 monthsPharmacist and staff will note the time spent on CKD-related issues at each visit on the study flow sheet.
Intra Cluster Analysis to Evaluate Effectiveness of Each Teaching Style Used by Peer EducatorsUp to 4 monthsClusters of more than 1 subject will undergo intra cluster analysis per each arm using data from the evaluation form to determine effectiveness of each teaching style used. Examples: Comparisons of self study versus cluster group participation of Workbook content and Handouts materials (Workbook, Chapter Post Tests, Chapter Frequently Asked Questions, Web-sites accessed, Food label exercise outcomes. Number of cluster meetings, Were modality choices discussed, How helpful was their experience (1-5 scale). Open comment section for subjects to expand on their experience, what was especially helpful and what could be improved.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Case Management Model (CMM)
CMM includes 3 visits of pharmacist initiated discussion of workbook content (including AP \[action plan\] and CKD web-based sites) and AP reinforcement.
0
Self Study (SS)
SS includes 2 visits. Subjects receive the workbook, paper copies of AP and food label exercise. Pre-testing will be done on V1 and Post testing on V2, eight weeks later. Subjects will be asked to read 1 chapter a week for the next 8 weeks. The pharmacist will provide a brief introduction of the workbook (5-10 minutes) and the AP. Only subject initiated questions will be answered. On V2, the pharmacist will answer subject initiated questions and ask about progress in the AP goal attainment and the program evaluation will be completed, as described in arm 1.Pharmacists track time spent at each visit to compare cost and outcomes. CKD What You Need To Know Workbook System: 139 page Workbook including CKD Action Plan, Web-Based Resources, Interactive CKD Patient education material CKD Action Plan: Goals based on international guidelines that can protect kidney function (1 knowledge and 10 action goals) Patient education material used separately for control arm. CKD Web-based Resource List: CKD Patient education material used separately for control arm Food Label reading exercise: CKD Patient education material used separately in all arms.
0
Control (Ctrl)
Ctrl includes 2 visits. Subjects receive a list of web-based CKD sites, a food label exercise and a copy of the AP with no additional intervention, other than answering subject initiated questions, on V1. Pre-testing will be done on V1 and Post testing on V2 and program evaluation will be done eight weeks later. On V2, the pharmacist will ask about AP goals and answer subject initiated questions. Pharmacists track time spent at each visit to compare cost and outcomes. CKD Action Plan: Goals based on international guidelines that can protect kidney function (1 knowledge and 10 action goals) Patient education material used separately for control arm. CKD Web-based Resource List: CKD Patient education material used separately for control arm Food Label reading exercise: CKD Patient education material used separately in all arms.
1
Total1

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyStudy terminated before participant completed.001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl (Ctrl)TotalSelf Study (SS)Case Management Model (CMM)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects Interested in Kidney Transplant (Post-test)

Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend in the subjects' level of interest in kidney transplant based on post-test evaluation form answers.

Time frame: after the intervention, up to 4 months

Population: Participants did not complete any protocol required assessments

Primary

Number of Subjects Interested in Kidney Transplant (Pre-test)

Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend in the subjects' level of interest in kidney transplant based on pre-test, post-test and evaluation form answers.

Time frame: before implementation of the intervention, average of 1 week

Population: Participants did not complete any protocol required assessments

Primary

Number of Subjects That Choose a Form of Home Dialysis (Home Hemodialysis or Peritoneal Dialysis) by the End of the Study.

This aim is to identify the impact interventions have on the subject's choice of modality (home dialysis versus in-center hemodialysis). Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend of patients answers based on comparisons of responses on pre and post tests and evaluation form with the options of Incenter Hemodialysis (ICH), Home Hemodialysis (HH), Peritoneal Dialysis (PD).

Time frame: up to 4 months

Population: Participants did not complete any protocol required assessments

Primary

Number of Subjects Who Can Choose a Dialysis Modality by the End of the Study.

This primary study aim is to increase the subject's ability to select a dialysis modality. Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend in the subjects' ability to choose or not choose a dialysis modality. Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend of patients answers based on comparisons of responses on pre and post tests and evaluation form with the options of Incenter Hemodialysis (ICH), Home Hemodialysis (HH), Peritoneal Dialysis (PD), No Dialysis, don't have enough information to make a to make a decision.

Time frame: up to 4 months

Population: Participants did not complete any protocol required assessments

Primary

Number of Subjects With a Possible Donor Identified (Post-test)

Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend in the subjects' selection of a possible donor based on post-test evaluation form answers.

Time frame: after the intervention, up to 4 months

Population: Participants did not complete any protocol required assessments

Primary

Number of Subjects With a Possible Donor Identified (Pre-test)

Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the trend in the subjects' selection of a possible donor based on pre-test evaluation form answers.

Time frame: before implementation of the intervention, average of 1 week

Population: Participants did not complete any protocol required assessments

Secondary

Amount of Time Spent by Pharmacist and Staff Per Subject

Pharmacist and staff will note the time spent on CKD-related issues at each visit on the study flow sheet.

Time frame: up to 4 months

Population: Participants did not complete any protocol required assessments

Secondary

Intra Cluster Analysis to Evaluate Effectiveness of Each Teaching Style Used by Peer Educators

Clusters of more than 1 subject will undergo intra cluster analysis per each arm using data from the evaluation form to determine effectiveness of each teaching style used. Examples: Comparisons of self study versus cluster group participation of Workbook content and Handouts materials (Workbook, Chapter Post Tests, Chapter Frequently Asked Questions, Web-sites accessed, Food label exercise outcomes. Number of cluster meetings, Were modality choices discussed, How helpful was their experience (1-5 scale). Open comment section for subjects to expand on their experience, what was especially helpful and what could be improved.

Time frame: Up to 4 months

Population: Participants did not complete any protocol required assessments

Secondary

Patient Engagement (Percent of Applicable Action Plan (AP) Goals Selected)

Patient Engagement will be measured by the percent of applicable AP goals selected The AP has 10 performance goals that are specific, actionable and realistic addressing these areas 1) Diabetes: Goal Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) 2) B/P Goal 3) Exercise Goal 4) Medications to Avoid, ensure taken, system to reorder 5) Stop Smoking 6-7) Kidney Friendly Diet: salt/water/edema, phosphorus/ protein 8) Monitor System for glucose checks, home blood pressure, weight, diet diary 9) Weight Management 10) Anemia: Goal hemoglobin. When AP is initiated goals already met or are don't apply to subject will be identified. Subject can then select goals to start.

Time frame: up to 4 months

Population: Participants did not complete any protocol required assessments

Secondary

Patient Engagement (Percent of Goals Met)

Patient Engagement will be measured by the percent of goals met (self-reported or provider-confirmed). Goal completion will be determined from evaluation form, AP form, or study flow sheet.

Time frame: up to 4 months

Population: Participants did not complete any protocol required assessments

Secondary

Patient Engagement (Percent of Visits Where a Patient-initiated CKD Discussion Takes Place)

Patient Engagement will be measured by the percent of visits where a patient-initiated CKD discussion occurred

Time frame: up to 4 months

Population: Participants did not complete any protocol required assessments

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026