Skip to content

Graded Motor Imagery and Total Knee Arthroplasty

The Effect of Graded Motor Imagery Training on Pain, Functional Performance, Motor Imagery Skill, and Kinesiophobia After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05138406
Enrollment
18
Registered
2021-12-01
Start date
2022-02-28
Completion date
2023-06-01
Last updated
2022-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Knee Arthroplasty

Keywords

Graded Motor Imagery, Pain, Rehabilitation, Total knee arthroplasty

Brief summary

This study was planned to investigate the long-term effectiveness of the early application of graded motor imagery therapy on pain parameters, functional performance, motor imagery skill, and kinesiophobia in individuals who underwent total knee arthroplasty surgery after knee osteoarthritis.

Detailed description

Participants aged 45-80 who are scheduled for total knee arthroplasty surgery after knee osteoarthritis will be included. Participants will be selected from the relevant population using a nonprobability random sampling method. Participants who agree to participate in the study and meet the inclusion criteria will be assigned to one of the groups (conventional rehabilitation-only or conventional rehabilitation with graded motor imagery) using the closed envelope method. Evaluations will be made one day before surgery, 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery for each group. Pain Visual Analog Scale; pressure pain threshold algometer; central sensitization Central Sensitization Inventory; the joint range of motion goniometer; muscle strength handheld dynamometer; kinesiophobia Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale; functional mobility and mental stopwatch Timed get up and go test; choice task Recognise™ application; motor imagery skill Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3; functional assessment Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); The catastrophic degree of pain is planned to be evaluated with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale.

Interventions

The graded motor imaging program will be set to 2 weeks each component. Participants will receive lateralization for the first 2 weeks, motor imagery for 2 weeks, and mirror therapy for 2 weeks. At the same time, standard rehabilitation will be applied for 6 weeks. Treatments will begin 24-48 hours after surgery. Treatments will be applied under the control of a physiotherapist 3 days a week and as home exercise 3 days a week.

OTHERStandard Rehabilitation

Standard rehabilitation consisting of cold therapy, stretching and strengthening exercises will be applied. Treatment will be applied under the control of a physiotherapist 3 days a week and as home exercise 3 days a week.

Sponsors

Inonu University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis and being on the waiting list to receive unilateral total knee arthroplasty * Approved by the orthopedist for early physiotherapy treatment after total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

* \- Individuals undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty or undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty, * Contralateral knee osteoarthritis (defined by activity greater than 4/10 pain) * Having undergone any physical therapy intervention or other surgery in the last 6 months * Any neurological, cardiac, pulmonary or psychiatric disease (eg, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, neoplasms, uncontrolled blood pressure, neurological conditions) before or after surgery; * Fracture, infection in the acute postoperative phase or presence of fever * Cognitive impairments that alter the probability of correct understanding of the motor imagery program * Body mass index \> 35 kg / m2 * Difficulties with understanding or communication * Insufficient knowledge of Turkish to follow the study instructions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensityBaselinePain at rest and during activity will be evaluated with the help of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a 10 cm scale that rates 0 points as no pain and 10 points as worst pain imaginable.
WOMACBaselineFunctional status will be assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). It consists of three subgroups as pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) and a total of 24 items. Each item has an evaluation score of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Joint Range of MotionBaselineActive knee flexion and extension angle will be evaluated.
Quadriceps muscle strengthBaselineIt will be measured during maximum voluntary isometric contraction using a hand-held muscle tester. After a warm-up test attempt, participants will be asked to extend their knees with maximum force against the device for five seconds. Two trials separated by a rest period of 120 seconds will be performed and averaged.
KinesiophobiaBaselineThe Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale will be used. A 4-point Likert score (1=I totally disagree, 2=Agree, 3=Disagree, 4=Totally agree) is used for each question in the scale. As a result of the survey, the person gets a total score between 17-68. A high score on the scale indicates a high level of kinesiophobia.
Functional mobilityBaselineThe Timed Up and Go test will be used. While the patient is sitting in a chair; will be asked to get up from the chair, walk 3 meters as fast as possible, turn around and sit back in the chair. The time elapsed while the patient performs the test will be recorded.
Pressure pain thresholdBaselineA pressure algometer (digital algometer) will be used. It will be evaluated at four test sites at the knee (medial and lateral edge of the patella, lateral and medial femoral condyles) and one distal painless zone at the wrist extensors (5 cm distal to the lateral epicondyle). It will be pressed with increasing pressure and the individual will be asked to say yes as soon as the participant feels pain or discomfort. Three attempts will be made at each point with a 30-second rest and the averages recorded.
Laterality taskBaselineRight-left discrimination will be evaluated using the Recognise™ application. The percentage of correct answers and reaction time will be recorded.
Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3)BaselineIt is a questionnaire that evaluates the imagery of four movements consisting of knee bending, jumping, arm movement and bending. It consists of three subscales and a total of 12 items evaluating external visual imagery, internal visual imagery, and kinesthetic imagery. Before starting the questionnaire, participants are given definitions of external visual imagery, internal visual imagery, and kinesthetic imagery. Before scoring each movement, the person is asked to perform the movement, then the movement is visualized three times. It is scored on a scale from 1 to 7. 1 point means very difficult to see/feel, while 7 points means very easy to see/feel.
Pain Catastrophizing ScaleBaselineThere are 13 states on the scale that describe different feelings and thoughts that may be associated with pain. Participants in each of these situations; 0: None, 1: Mildly, 2: Moderately, 3: Mostly, 4: Always. The total score is between 0-52; It is obtained by summing all 13 items.
Mental chronometry delta timeBaselineTimed Get Up and Go test will be used. It compares the time between the actual movement time and the imagined similar task time. At the end of the tests, mental chronometer measurements are calculated in terms of delta time with the formula '(real movement-imagined movement)/\[(real movement+imagined movement)/2\]x100'.
Central sensitizationBaselineIt will be evaluated with the Central Sensitization Inventory. It consists of 2 parts, part A, which evaluates the symptoms thought to be associated with central sensitization syndromes, and part B, which quickly questions whether the patient has received a specific diagnosis before. In part A, there are 25 items that question the frequency of symptoms seen in central sensitization syndromes and are scored between 0-100 points. Each symptom is defined as never (0 points) if the patient never experiences that symptom, rarely (1 point) if rarely, sometimes if sometimes (2 points), frequently (3 points) if often It is recorded as always (4 points). As the patient's central sensitization inventory score increases, it is thought that he has more symptoms related to central sensitization. In part B, it is questioned whether the patient has ever been diagnosed with any of the diseases included in the central sensitization syndromes by any physician.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactBusra CANDIRI
candiri_17@hotmail.com+905073780717
Backup ContactBurcu TALU
fzt.burcu@hotmail.com+905317910984

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026