Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of FIRTECH in Patients With Mild to Moderate Acute Low Back Pain

A Phase IIIB Randomized, Open Label, Two Arms and Parallel Group Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of FIRTECH (Infrared Therapy Patch), for Treating Patients Suffering From Mild to Moderate Acute Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05137041
Acronym
IRPATCH
Enrollment
221
Registered
2021-11-30
Start date
2021-11-04
Completion date
2022-11-22
Last updated
2025-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To assess the efficacy of the infrared therapy patch (ITP) FIRTECH for treating participants suffering from mild to moderate acute low back pain. Secondary Objectives: * To assess the efficacy of ITP FIRTECH on participant disability * To assess the efficacy of ITP FIRTECH on the degree of participant mobility * To assess the safety of ITP FIRTECH

Detailed description

Duration of study participation is up to 6 days per participant.

Interventions

DEVICEITP FIRTECH

Infrared Therapy Patch

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants suffering from mild to moderate acute low back pain * Low back pain (lumbar back pain) is defined as pain in the back from the level of the lowest rib down to the gluteal fold * Acute episode is defined as acute pain with less than 1 month duration * With intensity less than or equal to 6 on 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Exclusion criteria

* Participants suffering from any neurological pathology which could be responsible of the pain * Participants suffering from leg pain irradiation * Participants suffering from chronic lumbar pain of any etiology * Participants with chronic arthrosis and neurological symptoms * Participants experiencing recent significant trauma (i.e., injury related to a fall from a height or motor vehicle crash, or from a minor fall or heavy lifting in a participants with osteoporosis or possible osteoporosis) * Participants with major or progressive motor or sensory deficit, new-onset bowel or bladder incontinence or urinary retention, loss of anal sphincter tone, saddle anesthesia, history of cancer metastatic to bone, and suspected spinal infection * Participants clinically diagnosed with anxiety and/or depression * Participants using any medication for their pain within the last 48 hours within enrollment into the study * Participants taking any systemic medication for their pain within the last 24 hours (48 hours for diclofenac or corticosteroids) * Participants currently using recreational or illicit drugs or with a recent history of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence * Participants with any other medical condition that would interfere with efficacy and safety assessments based on investigator's judgment * Participants having received non-pharmaceutical lower back pain treatment (physiotherapy, heat treatment or massage) within 12 hours prior to enrollment * Participants having received spinal injection back pain treatment within 6 months prior to enrollment * Participants having received surgery due to back pain or rehabilitation due to back pain in the last 12 months * Participants with a known sensitivity to paracetamol * Participants with known cutaneous hypersensitivity to plaster * Participants participating in another clinical study within the past 30 days * Participants who are pregnant or breastfeeding; contraception is mandatory * Participants having damaged, non-intact, or scarred skin in or near the point of patch application * Participants having a known skin sensitivity * Participants having impaired blood circulation The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Responders at Day 5Day 5NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. Responder is defined as participant with ≥30% decrease from baseline in pain NRS and who did not take rescue medication (defined as receiving paracetamol (authorized), any other analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs as well as any non-pharmaceutical therapy (prohibited) for treating pain starting from randomization to Day 5 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Normalized Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Over 5 Days (SPID0-5)Baseline, Day 5NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. PID equals the NRS change from baseline. A negative difference indicates improvement. Time-weighted summed pain intensity difference (SPID) was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each postdose time point by the duration since the preceding time point and then summing these values. The Normalized Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID0- 5) is to be calculated as the SPID0- 5 divided by the total duration time. The score range for ITP FIRTECH arm is -5.0 to 2.1 and for no patch control arm is -5.8 to 3.1.
Percentage Change in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) ScoreFrom Baseline to Day 5The RMDQ is a self-administered, widely used health status measure for lower back pain (LBP). It measures pain and function, using 24 items describing limitations to everyday life that can be caused by LBP. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked - that is from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (maximum disability), where lower scores indicative of better function.
Mobility Evaluation Using Schober's TestBaseline and Day 5Change in mobility from baseline to Day 5 using Schober's test score.Schober test consists of extending a tape measure on the spinal column, between two posterior superior iliac spines and up to 10 cm above this, with the individual in a neutral position. Then, participant is asked to do anterior flexion of the trunk, then therapist will measure the distance of the marked points, in participants without changes of mobility should increase at least 5 cm. Increases smaller than 5 cm indicate that the test is positive, decreased mobility of the lumbar spine. These data were collected at baseline and at Day 5 and then the change from baseline to Day 5 was calculated for each treatment group.This change from baseline is analyzed by Analysis of covariance(ANCOVA) model with the treatment group as fixed effect and baseline instantaneous pain NRS as continuous covariate.Score range for ITP FIRTECH arm is -2.0 to 6.0 and for no patch control arm is -4.2 to 2.0.
Mobility Evaluation Using Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) TestBaseline and Day 5Change in mobility from baseline to Day 5 using FTF test score.Procedure for FTF test follow recommendation of American Psychological Association:participant stood erect on a platform 20-cm high with shoes removed and feet together.Participant was asked to bend forward as far as possible,while maintaining knees,arms,and fingers fully extended.Vertical distance between tip of middle finger and platform is measured with supple tape measure and is expressed in cm.Vertical distance between platform and tip of middle finger is positive when participant did not reach platform and negative when he could go further.These data were collected at baseline and at Day 5 and then change from baseline to Day 5 was calculated for each treatment group.This change from baseline is analyzed by ANCOVA model with treatment group as fixed effect and baseline instantaneous pain NRS as continuous covariate.Score range:ITP FIRTECH arm=-22.0-17.0;no patch control arm=-30.0-13.0.
Number of Participants Reported With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Day 1 to Day 6An adverse event (AE) is any symptom, sign, illness or experience that develops or worsens in severity during the course of the study. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is an event that emerges during treatment, having been absent pretreatment, or worsens relative to the pretreatment state.
Time to Reach no PainUp to Day 5Time to reach no pain was defined as the time (hours) from baseline subject symptom self-assessment date and time (Day 1 Visit 1, Pain Perception) to the first report of instantaneous pain NRS=0.
Time Course of PIDBaseline up to Day 5NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. PID was defined as instantaneous pain NRS change from baseline. Instantaneous pain NRS was analyzed from baseline up to Day 5. A negative difference indicates improvement.
Time Course of Pain ReliefBaseline up to Day 5Pain relief is assessed using a verbal rating scale (VRS), where 0 = none and 4 = complete in response to a pain relief question.
Normalized Sum of Pain ReliefBaseline up to Day 5Total pain relief (TOTPAR) is calculated by multiplying the pain relief score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point. The Normalized Sum of Pain Relief (TOTPAR0- 5) is to be calculated as the Total Pain Relief divided by the total duration time. Higher scores indicate more pain relief. The score range is from 0.0 to 3.5 for both the arms.
Time to Reach Acceptable PainUp to Day 5Time to reach acceptable pain is defined as the time in hours from baseline subject symptom self-assessment date and time (Day 1 Visit 1, Pain perception) to the first report of post-baseline acceptable pain.

Countries

Germany, Italy

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 221 participants took part in the study at 7 investigative sites in Germany and Italy from 04 November 2021 to 22 November 2022.

Pre-assignment details

Participants suffering from mild to moderate acute low back pain were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either FIRTECH patch or no patch.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ITP FIRTECH
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
113
No Patch Control Arm
No patch application.
108
Total221

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyReason not Specified01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicITP FIRTECHNo Patch Control ArmTotal
Age, Continuous45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.87
45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.97
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
59 Participants62 Participants121 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants46 Participants100 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1140 / 107
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 1147 / 107
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1140 / 107

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Responders at Day 5

NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. Responder is defined as participant with ≥30% decrease from baseline in pain NRS and who did not take rescue medication (defined as receiving paracetamol (authorized), any other analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs as well as any non-pharmaceutical therapy (prohibited) for treating pain starting from randomization to Day 5 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization).

Time frame: Day 5

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat population was defined as all participants randomized that had the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) evaluation done at baseline and Day 5 with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to 0).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ITP FIRTECHPercentage of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Responders at Day 572.5 percentage of participants
No Patch Control ArmPercentage of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Responders at Day 549.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.002Fisher Exact
Secondary

Mobility Evaluation Using Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) Test

Change in mobility from baseline to Day 5 using FTF test score.Procedure for FTF test follow recommendation of American Psychological Association:participant stood erect on a platform 20-cm high with shoes removed and feet together.Participant was asked to bend forward as far as possible,while maintaining knees,arms,and fingers fully extended.Vertical distance between tip of middle finger and platform is measured with supple tape measure and is expressed in cm.Vertical distance between platform and tip of middle finger is positive when participant did not reach platform and negative when he could go further.These data were collected at baseline and at Day 5 and then change from baseline to Day 5 was calculated for each treatment group.This change from baseline is analyzed by ANCOVA model with treatment group as fixed effect and baseline instantaneous pain NRS as continuous covariate.Score range:ITP FIRTECH arm=-22.0-17.0;no patch control arm=-30.0-13.0.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 5

Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to 0). Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at specific timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITP FIRTECHMobility Evaluation Using Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) TestBaseline21.0 cmStandard Deviation 17.48
ITP FIRTECHMobility Evaluation Using Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) TestDay 517.4 cmStandard Deviation 14.88
ITP FIRTECHMobility Evaluation Using Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) TestChange from Baseline-3.5 cmStandard Deviation 6.6
No Patch Control ArmMobility Evaluation Using Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) TestBaseline18.6 cmStandard Deviation 18.27
No Patch Control ArmMobility Evaluation Using Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) TestDay 517.5 cmStandard Deviation 16.41
No Patch Control ArmMobility Evaluation Using Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) TestChange from Baseline-1.7 cmStandard Deviation 5.31
p-value: 0.12195% CI: [-2.976, 0.25]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mobility Evaluation Using Schober's Test

Change in mobility from baseline to Day 5 using Schober's test score.Schober test consists of extending a tape measure on the spinal column, between two posterior superior iliac spines and up to 10 cm above this, with the individual in a neutral position. Then, participant is asked to do anterior flexion of the trunk, then therapist will measure the distance of the marked points, in participants without changes of mobility should increase at least 5 cm. Increases smaller than 5 cm indicate that the test is positive, decreased mobility of the lumbar spine. These data were collected at baseline and at Day 5 and then the change from baseline to Day 5 was calculated for each treatment group.This change from baseline is analyzed by Analysis of covariance(ANCOVA) model with the treatment group as fixed effect and baseline instantaneous pain NRS as continuous covariate.Score range for ITP FIRTECH arm is -2.0 to 6.0 and for no patch control arm is -4.2 to 2.0.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 5

Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to 0). Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at specific timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITP FIRTECHMobility Evaluation Using Schober's TestBaseline7.9 cmStandard Deviation 4.52
ITP FIRTECHMobility Evaluation Using Schober's TestDay 58.7 cmStandard Deviation 5.48
ITP FIRTECHMobility Evaluation Using Schober's TestChange from Baseline0.9 cmStandard Deviation 1.44
No Patch Control ArmMobility Evaluation Using Schober's TestBaseline8.1 cmStandard Deviation 4.89
No Patch Control ArmMobility Evaluation Using Schober's TestDay 58.1 cmStandard Deviation 5.23
No Patch Control ArmMobility Evaluation Using Schober's TestChange from Baseline-0.1 cmStandard Deviation 1.27
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.511, 1.581]ANCOVA
Secondary

Normalized Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Over 5 Days (SPID0-5)

NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. PID equals the NRS change from baseline. A negative difference indicates improvement. Time-weighted summed pain intensity difference (SPID) was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each postdose time point by the duration since the preceding time point and then summing these values. The Normalized Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID0- 5) is to be calculated as the SPID0- 5 divided by the total duration time. The score range for ITP FIRTECH arm is -5.0 to 2.1 and for no patch control arm is -5.8 to 3.1.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 5

Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to 0).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITP FIRTECHNormalized Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Over 5 Days (SPID0-5)-1.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.356
No Patch Control ArmNormalized Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Over 5 Days (SPID0-5)-0.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.484
p-value: 0.01595% CI: [-0.817, -0.137]ANCOVA
Secondary

Normalized Sum of Pain Relief

Total pain relief (TOTPAR) is calculated by multiplying the pain relief score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point. The Normalized Sum of Pain Relief (TOTPAR0- 5) is to be calculated as the Total Pain Relief divided by the total duration time. Higher scores indicate more pain relief. The score range is from 0.0 to 3.5 for both the arms.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 5

Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to 0).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITP FIRTECHNormalized Sum of Pain Relief1.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.834
No Patch Control ArmNormalized Sum of Pain Relief0.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.842
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.415, 0.903]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants Reported With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any symptom, sign, illness or experience that develops or worsens in severity during the course of the study. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is an event that emerges during treatment, having been absent pretreatment, or worsens relative to the pretreatment state.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 6

Population: Safety population was defined as all participants randomized into the study and, if randomized to the patch arm, had the device installed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ITP FIRTECHNumber of Participants Reported With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)18 Participants
No Patch Control ArmNumber of Participants Reported With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)7 Participants
Secondary

Percentage Change in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Score

The RMDQ is a self-administered, widely used health status measure for lower back pain (LBP). It measures pain and function, using 24 items describing limitations to everyday life that can be caused by LBP. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked - that is from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (maximum disability), where lower scores indicative of better function.

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 5

Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to 0). Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITP FIRTECHPercentage Change in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Score-32.2 percentage change in RMDQ scoreStandard Deviation 61.81
No Patch Control ArmPercentage Change in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Score-16.4 percentage change in RMDQ scoreStandard Deviation 41.64
p-value: 0.10395% CI: [-32.661, 0.828]ANCOVA
Secondary

Time Course of Pain Relief

Pain relief is assessed using a verbal rating scale (VRS), where 0 = none and 4 = complete in response to a pain relief question.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 5

Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to 0). Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available at specific timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 5 Morning1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 2 Morning1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 2 Evening1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 3 Morning1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 3 Evening1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 51.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 1 Evening0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 4 Morning1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 4 Evening1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 4 Morning0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 50.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 2 Morning0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 1 Evening0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 2 Evening0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 3 Evening0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 3 Morning0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 4 Evening0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of Pain ReliefDay 5 Morning1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Comparison: VRS: Day 1 Eveningp-value: <0.001Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: VRS: Day 2 Morningp-value: 0.001Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: VRS: Day 2 Eveningp-value: <0.001Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: VRS: Day 3 Morningp-value: <0.001Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: VRS: Day 3 Eveningp-value: <0.001Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: VRS: Day 4 Morningp-value: <0.001Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: VRS: Day 4 Eveningp-value: <0.001Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: VRS: Day 5 Morningp-value: 0.024Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: VRS: Day 5p-value: <0.001Satterthwaite t-test
Secondary

Time Course of PID

NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. PID was defined as instantaneous pain NRS change from baseline. Instantaneous pain NRS was analyzed from baseline up to Day 5. A negative difference indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 5

Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to 0). Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at specific timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 5-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 2 Morning-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 2 Evening-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 3 Morning-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 3 Evening-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 4 Morning-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 4 Evening-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 5 Morning-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
ITP FIRTECHTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 1 Evening-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 5-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 4 Morning-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 2 Morning-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 1 Evening-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 2 Evening-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 4 Evening-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 3 Morning-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 5 Morning-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
No Patch Control ArmTime Course of PIDChange from Baseline at Day 3 Evening-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Day 1 Eveningp-value: 0.001Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Day 2 Morningp-value: 0.035Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Day 2 Eveningp-value: 0.004Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Day 3 Morningp-value: 0.007Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Day 3 Eveningp-value: 0.005Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Day 4 Morningp-value: 0.001Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Day 4 Eveningp-value: 0.007Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Day 5 Morningp-value: 0.096Satterthwaite t-test
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Day 5p-value: 0.015Satterthwaite t-test
Secondary

Time to Reach Acceptable Pain

Time to reach acceptable pain is defined as the time in hours from baseline subject symptom self-assessment date and time (Day 1 Visit 1, Pain perception) to the first report of post-baseline acceptable pain.

Time frame: Up to Day 5

Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to 0).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ITP FIRTECHTime to Reach Acceptable Pain9.62 hours
No Patch Control ArmTime to Reach Acceptable Pain8.65 hours
p-value: 0.564Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Reach no Pain

Time to reach no pain was defined as the time (hours) from baseline subject symptom self-assessment date and time (Day 1 Visit 1, Pain Perception) to the first report of instantaneous pain NRS=0.

Time frame: Up to Day 5

Population: Full Analysis Set population was defined as all participants randomized that had the NRS evaluation done at baseline and that were not using any rescue medication starting from randomization to Day 5 Visit 2 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization with the exclusion of participants without any pain at baseline (i.e. baseline instantaneous pain NRS score equal to 0). Overall number analyzed is the number of censored participants with the event.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ITP FIRTECHTime to Reach no PainNA hours
No Patch Control ArmTime to Reach no PainNA hours
p-value: 0.289Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026