Skip to content

Intravenous Bolus-infusion Versus Sliding Scale of Insulin for Intra-operative Glycemic Control

Intravenous Bolus-infusion Versus Sliding Scale of Insulin for Intra-operative Glycemic Control in Elective Laparotomy Surgeries

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05136157
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-11-29
Start date
2021-11-01
Completion date
2022-07-15
Last updated
2022-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intraoperative Complications

Keywords

Insulin, Intra operative, Sliding scale, Bolus- infusion

Brief summary

Pre-operative blood glucose (BG) concentrations in type 2 diabetic patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery; have an increased incidence of in-hospital morbidity for cardiopulmonary and infectious complications. Also, hyperglycemia is associated with increased production and impaired scavenging of oxygen reactive species, polymorph nuclear neutrophil dysfunction and decreased intracellular killing, resulting in poor wound healing and increased risk of infection. Thus, perioperative optimal glucose management contributes to reduced morbidity and mortality. Recommendations favor moderate levels of capillary blood glucose (CBG); maintaining it in the range of 140-180 mg/dl. Peri-operative doses of rapidly acting insulin for glycemic control could be done by the sliding scale or the bolus-infusion approaches. The sliding scale of insulin is commonly used to manage peri-operative hyper-glycaemia. It involves administering prescribed doses of insulin when the CBG is within determined ranges and withholding insulin when the CBG is within normal range. When used as a sole therapy; it results in under-insulinisation and thus hyper-glycaemia. The use of a dynamic insulin regimen like the intravenous bolus-infusion approach; allows adjusting the blood glucose level according to the insulin sensitivity of each patient, thus, better glucose control and less variations than the intermittent intravenous bolus of short-acting insulin in the sliding scale despite the same blood glucose target.

Detailed description

compare the rapidly acting insulin injection via the bolus-infusion approach (Study group) to the sliding scale approach (Control group) as regards the intra-operative glycemic control

Interventions

50 IU of rapid acting insulin taken by a 100 units (1ml) insulin syringe will be added to a 50 ml syringe containing normal saline (NS) to have a total volume of 50 ml with a concentration of 1 IU of insulin per 1 ml of NS

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA physical status II patients * aged 21-65 years * known to have type1 or 2 diabetes mellitusw * pre-operative fasting blood glucose level ˂ 350 mg/dl * scheduled to undergo elective laparotomy surgeries * expected to exceed 2 hours duration under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* Patients' refusal * diabetic ketoacidosis * hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome * serum potassium ˂3.5 mEq/L * HbA1c \>8.5%.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intra-operative CBG level between 140- 180 mg/dl all over the operation7 monthsBase line CBG will be measured for all patients then every 30 minutes and in the PACU

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total IU of rapidly acting insulin given to the patient7 monthstotal units of insulin given to the patient will be calculated in the PACU
Peri-operative changes in serum potassium7 monthsBase line serum potassium will be compared to that measured in the PACU

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026