Fertility Issues, Oncology, Surgery
Conditions
Keywords
Percuvataneous laparoscopy, Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation
Brief summary
To compare surgical outcomes of oncologic patients that underwent conventional laparoscopy and percutaneous laparoscopy for cryopreservation of ovarian tissue.
Detailed description
This is a retrospective analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous laparoscopy for the ovarian tissue explant in oncologic women. Surgical outcomes of patients that underwent percutaneous laparoscopy were compared with those of women that underwent conventional laparoscopy. Data from 2017 to 2021 were collected in a single Oncologic Center in Italy. The principal outcomes considered are post-operative pain, recovery time and aesthetic outcomes.
Interventions
Ovarian tissue explant for cryopreservation of ovarian tissue
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Oncologic women with desire to preserve fertility
Exclusion criteria
* Ovarian explant with different techniques than laparoscopy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Post-operative pain | 0-1 and 2 days after surgery | Post-operative pain is evaluated with VAS score ranging from 1 to 10 (higher score, maximum pain) |
| Aesthetic outcomes | minimum 3 months after surgery | General satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcomes is collected with a satisfaction survey. The score ranged from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 very satisfied. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery time | Days | Time from surgical intervention to discharge in days |
| Operative time | 1 day | Time of operation in minutes |
| Blood loss | 1 day | Entity of blood loss during surgery in ml |
| Surgical complications | 30 days | The presence of absence of intra and post-operative complications (yes or not and type) |
Countries
Italy