Skip to content

Radiofrequency Ablation of Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

Radiofrequency Ablation of Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05132205
Enrollment
10
Registered
2021-11-24
Start date
2021-12-17
Completion date
2024-11-19
Last updated
2025-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Brief summary

Traditionally, surgery has been the standard recommendation for treating papillary thyroid cancer. The risk of surgery including permanent hoarseness, permanent hypocalcemia, a mid-cervical scar, and the potential for permanent hypothyroidism may be unacceptable for some patients, especially with low risk papillary thyroid carcinoma. The recent American Thyroid Association guidelines have proposed the option of active surveillance with low risk papillary thyroid cancer less than 210 mm. However, most patients find observation anxiety provoking knowing of having cancer. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of small low risk papillary thyroid cancer is a promising therapeutic modality for these patients that reduces the risks associated with surgery and the anxiety of taking a watchful approach. However, this technique has not been validated in the North American population. The investigators aim to describe the investigators' initial experience with RFA of low risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) compared to active surveillance (AS) done by Head and Neck Endocrine surgeons at Johns Hopkins Medical Institute. Primary objective: * To evaluate the safety, efficacy and oncological outcomes of the procedure. Secondary objective: * To determine the patient functional outcomes in comparison to the observational control.

Interventions

PROCEDURERadiofrequency Ablation

Radiofrequency Ablation using RFMedical device.

Sponsors

RF Medical Co., Ltd
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients regardless of sex or race between the ages 18-100 with biopsy proven PTMC with a Bethesda V or VI pathology or indeterminate cytology on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) who are recommended for treatment (Bethesda III/IV). * Solitary thyroid nodule \<20mm in maximal dimension. * No sonographic evidence of extrathyroidal invasion, lymph node metastases, or distant metastases. * There must be at least 1 mm of normal tissue as a margin, without sonographic evidence of contact with the capsule.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with other histological types of thyroid malignancy other than papillary thyroid cancer such as medullary carcinoma, Proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) or Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) mutations * Clinically apparent multicentricity * Lesions larger than 20 mm in maximum diameter. * Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. * Extension of nodule to posterior thyroid capsule. * Ultrasound or other imaging studies revealing cervical lymph node involvement or distant metastases. * Pregnancy. * Pacemaker. * Previous RFA.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage change in nodule volumeBaseline and 12 monthsThis will assess the percentage change in nodule volume (cubic millimeters).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in voice related quality of life as assessed by the VHI-10Baseline and 6 monthsChange from baseline in Voice Handicap index (VHI-10) score. Score ranges from 0-40. Higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Scar cosmesis score6 monthsAverage score on Scar cosmesis assessment and rating (SCAR) scale. Score ranges from 0-15. Higher score indicates worse scar.
Percentage change in nodule volumeBaseline and 6 monthsThis will assess the percentage change in nodule volume (cubic millimeters).
Change in overall quality of life assessed by the PROMIS scoreBaseline and 6 monthsChange from baseline on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 score. Score ranges from 0-100. Higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Number of complications12 monthsCounts of skin burn, hematoma and vocal cord palsy.
Change in eating assessment score as assessed by the EAT-10Baseline and 6 monthsChange from baseline on Eating assessment tool (EAT-10) score. Score ranges from 0-40. Higher score indicates worse symptoms.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026