Skip to content

Gait Re-education Program in Subjects With Parkinson´s Disease

Effectiveness of a Gait Re-education Program on a Sequential Square Treadmill (Tapiz Fisior) in Subjects With Parkison´s Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05131880
Enrollment
52
Registered
2021-11-23
Start date
2021-11-01
Completion date
2024-05-01
Last updated
2025-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Brief summary

Randomized controlled study that will include participants diagnosed with Parkinson's disease in mild or moderate stage with altered gait pattern who will be randomized following a simple randomization procedure in which one group will perform an intervention based on a gait re-education program called TAPIZ FISIOR- motor control and learning added to a conventional physiotherapy program; and the other group will perform only a conventional physiotherapy program. The evaluators will be unaware of the patient's treatment status.

Detailed description

All participants interested in participating in the present study will be part of the research project. Once recruited, they will be randomly assigned to two intervention groups: A and B. Group A (control group) will perform a conventional physiotherapy treatment 2/3 sessions per week of 30 minutes duration; on the other hand, group B (intervention group) will perform the treatment of group A and a therapeutic supplement of 2-3 sessions per week of about 30 minutes. During the research period, several measurements of the variables studied will be taken: one before the intervention, one immediately after the end of the intervention, and another measurement 12 weeks after the end of the intervention. The treatment will be carried out and supervised at all times by qualified physiotherapists, who will explain to you what the treatment consists of, the days you should attend, and the schedules. No adverse effects are expected from this therapy that could pose a risk for health.

Interventions

OTHERGait Re-education Program Using the Fisior® Mat Sequential Training System in Subjects with Parkinson's Disease

Randomized controlled study that will include participants diagnosed with Parkinson's disease in mild or moderate stage with altered gait pattern who will be randomized following a simple randomization procedure in which one group will perform an intervention based on a gait re-education program called TAPIZ FISIOR®- motor control and learning added to a conventional physiotherapy program; and the other group will perform only a conventional physiotherapy program. The evaluators will be unaware of the patient's treatment condition.

Sponsors

Universidad Europea de Madrid
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Older than 50 years. * Diagnosed Parkinson Disease. * Not to be institutionalized. * Barthel index scores of ≥ 60. * Ability to communicate and to get up and walk at least 10 m (33 ft)

Exclusion criteria

* Medical criteria for contraindication of treatment. * Severe behavioral problems that hinder participation in the training program.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical Performance: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)Before the intervention, up to 15 minutes; and at the end of 12 weeks intervention, up to 15 minutes.The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) assesses lower limb function and mobility through three subtests: standing balance (0-4), 4-m gait speed (0-4), and five-times chair rise (0-4). Subtest scores are summed for a total range of 0-12, with higher scores indicating better performance. The SPPB is widely used to detect mobility limitations, frailty, and disability risk, and has been proposed as an indicator of the mobility subdomain of intrinsic capacity.
Walk Speed: Timed Up and Go (TUG) TestBefore the intervention, up to 15 minutes; and at the end of 12 weeks intervention, up to 15 minutes.The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test assesses basic mobility by measuring the time to stand from a chair, walk three meters, turn, return, and sit down. The time reflects walking speed, balance, turning ability, and overall functional mobility. Shorter times indicate better mobility, while longer times suggest slower gait and potential functional limitations.
Risk of Falls: FallSkipBefore the intervention, up to 10 minutes; and at the end of 12 weeks intervention, up to 10 minutes.FallSkip is a validated tool for assessing fall risk using a portable inertial sensor placed on the lumbar spine. It evaluates parameters such as balance, gait, reaction time, and strength during standardized tasks. Results are integrated into a global score ranging from 0 (highest risk) to 100 (lowest risk), with higher scores indicating better performance and reduced fall risk.
Functionality and Independence: Barthel IndexBefore the intervention, up to 20 minutes.The Barthel Index is a validated scale measuring functionality and independence in activities of daily living (ADLs). It assesses 10 domains including feeding, bathing, dressing, mobility, and continence. Scores range from 0 (total dependence) to 100 (complete independence). Higher scores indicate greater functional autonomy, while lower scores reflect higher dependency and care needs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
General SatisfactionAt the end of 12 weeks intervention, up to 10 minutes.The General Satisfaction test is used to assess participants' overall satisfaction with the intervention. Scores range from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates a very poor experience and 5 indicates an excellent experience. The scale reflects the participant's subjective evaluation of the intervention, including factors such as perceived usefulness, comfort, and outcomes. Higher scores represent greater satisfaction. This scale provides a quick and simple way to capture the overall impression of the intervention from the participant's perspective.

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental
The experimental group will participate in a physiotherapy program with the addition of the Fisior Tapestry Method physiotherapy program, three sessions per week, for 12 weeks. An initial assessment will be made at the beginning of the study, another one at the end of the intervention, and another one at follow-up. GAIT RE-EDUCATION PROGRAM ON A SEQUENTIAL MAT IN SUBJECTS WITH PARKINSON'S DISEASE: Randomized controlled study that will include participants diagnosed with Parkinson's disease in mild or moderate stage with altered gait pattern who will be randomized following a simple randomization procedure in which one group will perform an intervention based on a gait re-education program called TAPIZ FISIOR- motor control and learning added to a conventional physiotherapy program; and the other group will perform only a conventional physiotherapy program. The evaluators will be unaware of the patient's treatment condition.
25
Control
The control group will participate in a physiotherapy program three sessions per week for 12 weeks. GAIT RE-EDUCATION PROGRAM ON A SEQUENTIAL MAT IN SUBJECTS WITH PARKINSON'S DISEASE: Randomized controlled study that will include participants diagnosed with Parkinson's disease in mild or moderate stage with altered gait pattern who will be randomized following a simple randomization procedure in which one group will perform an intervention based on a gait re-education program called TAPIZ FISIOR- motor control and learning added to a conventional physiotherapy program; and the other group will perform only a conventional physiotherapy program. The evaluators will be unaware of the patient's treatment condition.
27
Total52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimentalControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
21 Participants22 Participants43 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Age, Continuous71.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.39
71.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
71.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.96
Functionality and independence: Barthel Index91.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.13
87.59 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.12
89.62 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.04
Physical Performance: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)9.60 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.47
8.78 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.75
9.17 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
25 Participants27 Participants52 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
25 participants27 participants52 participants
Risk of Falls: FallSkip25.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.91
26.48 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.39
25.96 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.08
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants12 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 270 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Functionality and Independence: Barthel Index

The Barthel Index is a validated scale measuring functionality and independence in activities of daily living (ADLs). It assesses 10 domains including feeding, bathing, dressing, mobility, and continence. Scores range from 0 (total dependence) to 100 (complete independence). Higher scores indicate greater functional autonomy, while lower scores reflect higher dependency and care needs.

Time frame: Before the intervention, up to 20 minutes.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Comparator: Control GroupFunctionality and Independence: Barthel Index87.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.12
Experimental GroupFunctionality and Independence: Barthel Index91.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.13
Primary

Physical Performance: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) assesses lower limb function and mobility through three subtests: standing balance (0-4), 4-m gait speed (0-4), and five-times chair rise (0-4). Subtest scores are summed for a total range of 0-12, with higher scores indicating better performance. The SPPB is widely used to detect mobility limitations, frailty, and disability risk, and has been proposed as an indicator of the mobility subdomain of intrinsic capacity.

Time frame: Before the intervention, up to 15 minutes; and at the end of 12 weeks intervention, up to 15 minutes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Comparator: Control GroupPhysical Performance: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)Pre intervention8.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Active Comparator: Control GroupPhysical Performance: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)Post intervention8.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Experimental GroupPhysical Performance: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)Post intervention10.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.01
Experimental GroupPhysical Performance: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)Pre intervention9.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Primary

Risk of Falls: FallSkip

FallSkip is a validated tool for assessing fall risk using a portable inertial sensor placed on the lumbar spine. It evaluates parameters such as balance, gait, reaction time, and strength during standardized tasks. Results are integrated into a global score ranging from 0 (highest risk) to 100 (lowest risk), with higher scores indicating better performance and reduced fall risk.

Time frame: Before the intervention, up to 10 minutes; and at the end of 12 weeks intervention, up to 10 minutes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Comparator: Control GroupRisk of Falls: FallSkipPost intervention26.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.18
Active Comparator: Control GroupRisk of Falls: FallSkipPre intervention26.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.39
Experimental GroupRisk of Falls: FallSkipPre intervention25.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.91
Experimental GroupRisk of Falls: FallSkipPost intervention21.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.24
Primary

Walk Speed: Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test

The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test assesses basic mobility by measuring the time to stand from a chair, walk three meters, turn, return, and sit down. The time reflects walking speed, balance, turning ability, and overall functional mobility. Shorter times indicate better mobility, while longer times suggest slower gait and potential functional limitations.

Time frame: Before the intervention, up to 15 minutes; and at the end of 12 weeks intervention, up to 15 minutes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Comparator: Control GroupWalk Speed: Timed Up and Go (TUG) TestPre intervention0.55 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.16
Active Comparator: Control GroupWalk Speed: Timed Up and Go (TUG) TestPost intervention0.53 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.19
Experimental GroupWalk Speed: Timed Up and Go (TUG) TestPre intervention0.59 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.13
Experimental GroupWalk Speed: Timed Up and Go (TUG) TestPost intervention0.67 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.13
Secondary

General Satisfaction

The General Satisfaction test is used to assess participants' overall satisfaction with the intervention. Scores range from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates a very poor experience and 5 indicates an excellent experience. The scale reflects the participant's subjective evaluation of the intervention, including factors such as perceived usefulness, comfort, and outcomes. Higher scores represent greater satisfaction. This scale provides a quick and simple way to capture the overall impression of the intervention from the participant's perspective.

Time frame: At the end of 12 weeks intervention, up to 10 minutes.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Comparator: Control GroupGeneral Satisfaction4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Experimental GroupGeneral Satisfaction4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026