Skip to content

Precise Profiling of Liver Disease Patients With DPMAS Therapy, Treating Optimal Patients and Achieving Hard Endpoint (PADSTONE Study)

Precise Profiling of Liver Disease Patients With DPMAS Therapy, Treating Optimal Patients and Achieving Hard Endpoint: a Multicenter, Cluster-controlled Study (PADSTONE Study)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05129904
Acronym
PADSTONE
Enrollment
1300
Registered
2021-11-22
Start date
2021-09-15
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2026-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

DPMAS Therapy in Liver Disease Patients

Keywords

double plasma molecular absorption system, liver disease, acute-on-chronic liver failure, mortality

Brief summary

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a life-threatening syndrome occurring in patients with chronic liver disease. In China, hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the main cause of cirrhosis. HBV related ACLF is characterized by multiple organs failure (liver, coagulation and kidney, etc.) and confers with high risk of short-term mortality. For the treatment of ACLF patients, recent studies have explored the therapeutic efficacy of extracorporeal liver support therapies, such as albumin dialysis, plasma exchange. However, the clinical efficacy remains to be fully elucidated. Liver transplantation is the most efficient way to improve the survival of ACLF patients, especially for those suffering from three or more organ failures. Recently, a novel extracorporeal system which is called double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) has been applied for the treatment of ACLF patients. DPMAS is an extracorporeal therapeutic procedure that combines two hemoperfusion devices. During treatment, toxic plasma is isolated and purified via perfusion through two adsorbers, after which the purified plasma is reinfused back into the patient's circulation. This technique requires no massive plasma supply and avoids the risks of plasma-related allergic reactions and pathogen transmission. DPMAS can rapidly alleviate jaundice and lower serum bilirubin levels, thereby mitigating the hepatotoxic effects induced by excessive bilirubin and bile acids. Despite the widespread clinical application of DPMAS in patients with liver failure, high-quality evidence supporting its definite clinical efficacy remains insufficient. Accordingly, this prospective, multicenter cluster-controlled study is designed to evaluate the clinical benefits of DPMAS via validated hard clinical endpoints, including short-term mortality and disease progression, and screen out suitable candidate patients. Furthermore, biological specimens including plasma, urine and feces will be collected to characterize the molecular profiles of ACLF patients receiving DPMAS treatment through multi-omics analyses.

Interventions

OTHERDouble plasma molecular absorption system

As a type of ECLS, double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) integrates plasma filtration with two specific adsorption membranes, which can efficiently remove bilirubin and the middle-molecular toxins, respectively. In the DPMAS clusters, patients receive at least one DPMAS treatment session during the study period, as treatment details regarding the number of DPMAS sessions and session intervals are made upon institutional protocols. DPMAS treatment can be applied either alone or in combination with PE, and both modalities are permitted in this study. PE is allowed in both groups as standard supportive care.

Sponsors

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
CollaboratorOTHER
Tianjin Third Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing YouAn Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
West China Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Meng Chao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Ninth Hospital of Nanchang
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Taihe Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center of Fudan University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
CollaboratorOTHER
Southwest Hospital, China
CollaboratorOTHER
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing Ditan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
CollaboratorOTHER
Shandong Provincial Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Huashan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
People's Hospital of Anshun City of Guizhou Province
CollaboratorOTHER
LanZhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
CollaboratorOTHER
Chengdu Public Health Clinical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Ruijin Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shandong First Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Hospital of Shandong University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Hunan Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhengzhou University Affiliated Luoyang Centre Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Hainan People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zunyi Medical College
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Hospital Of Guizhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
CollaboratorOTHER
First People's Hospital of Foshan
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Capital Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The First Hospital of Jilin University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Hospital of Yunnan Province
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Shandong Provincial Clinical Center for Public Health
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Hospitalized patients 2. Age \>18 years 3. Chronic liver disease regardless of the etiology 4. Total bilirubin ≥ 12mg/dl and INR ≥ 1.5

Exclusion criteria

1. With ≥ 3 organ failures (SOFA criteria); 2. The pregnant; 3. With severe non-hepatic disease (such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease level IV, chronic kidney disease with end-stage renal failure, myocardial infarction within 3 months before admission); 4. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection without treatment; 5. Patients with unstable hemodynamics caused by infection or acute bleeding; 6. Hospital stays \<48 hours; 7. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma during screening period; 8. For the DPMAS clusters: patients decline to receive DPMAS treatment alone or in combination with PE; 9. For the SOC clusters: patients plan to receive DPMAS therapy; 10. Not suitable to participate in this study judging by researchers (e.g., patients with severe advanced pancreatic tumors, hematological tumors); 11. Not sign the informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The rate of progression within 4 weeks4 weeksThe progression of ACLF within 4 weeks
The 4-week transplant-free mortality4 weeksThe 4-week transplant-free mortality

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The transplant-free mortality within 12 weeks12 weeksThe transplant-free mortality within 12 weeks
The progression of ACLF within 12 weeks12 weeksThe progression rate of ACLF within 12 weeks

Countries

China

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORJinjun Chen, Doctor

Nanfang Hospital, Sourthern Medical University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 27, 2026