Skip to content

EffiCacy, Safety and ToLErability of a Novel Ocular ANtiseptic for Ocular Use (CLEAN)

Randomized, Double-Masked, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of IRX-101 Versus 5% Povidone-Iodine as an Ocular Surface Sterilizer

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05127525
Acronym
CLEAN
Enrollment
5
Registered
2021-11-19
Start date
2021-11-15
Completion date
2022-01-31
Last updated
2022-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion, Diabetic Macular Edema, Glaucoma/Closed Angle Glaucoma

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-masked, multicenter, study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of IRX-101 versus 5% povidone-iodine (PI) in subjects receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. The study will be conducted in up to 30 centers in the United States (US).

Detailed description

Intravitreal injection therapy (IVT) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents has transformed the treatment landscape of several retinal diseases, including exudative (wet) macular degeneration, retinal vein occlusion, diabetic macular edema, and choroidal neovascularization. The most common adverse effects of IVT occur due to the side effects of Povidone-Iodine 5% (PI; brand name: Betadine® 5%; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX), the antiseptic placed on the ocular surface prior to each injection. PI is nearly universally used to prevent ocular infection (endophthalmitis). PI leads to marked corneal epithelial toxicity in humans,6, 7 resulting in debilitating side effects including decreased visual acuity and pain that can last more than 3 days post-IVT. Post-IVT pain is severe enough to require oral analgesics in up to 30% of patients and is a frequent cause of treatment discontinuation. Therefore, there is an unmet need in ophthalmology for a potent ocular antiseptic with a superior safety profile.

Interventions

IRX-101 to prevent infectious endophthalmitis following intravitreal injection therapy (IVT)

DRUGControl

Providone-Iodine Betadine to prevent infectious endophthalmitis following intravitreal injection therapy (IVT)

Sponsors

iRenix Medical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Capable of giving informed consent 2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study 3. Male or female, ≥ 18 years of age and receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in one or both eyes

Exclusion criteria

1. Current or past diagnosis of endophthalmitis 2. Current diagnosis of uveitis 3. Current use of viscous lidocaine products for ocular anesthesia prior to IVT 4. Currently receiving intravitreal steroid injections 5. Concurrent participation in another clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of infectious endophthalmitis after topical use of IRX-101 combined with IVT2 hours post-injectionTo evaluate the rate of infectious endophthalmitis after topical use of IRX-101 following intravitreal injection therapy (IVT) (% occurrence or rate of population randomized to IRX-101 test arm)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Telephone questionnaire regarding patient-reported post-injection pain2 hours post-injectionTelephone questionnaire with questions asked of patients regarding patient-reported post-injection pain compared to Providone-Iodine Betadine control group (three questions asked scale of 0 to 10, 0 being no pain to 10 being worst pain)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026