Skip to content

Multicentre Real-life Follow-up Study of Rare Epileptic Syndromes in Children and Adolescents

Multicentre Real-life Follow-up Study of Rare Epileptic Syndromes in Children and Adolescents

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05126914
Acronym
EPIRARE
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2021-11-19
Start date
2025-12-11
Completion date
2028-12-01
Last updated
2026-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dravet Syndrome, Epilepsy, West Syndrome

Brief summary

Rare epilepsies as a whole account for 20-30% of epilepsies, but knowledge about prognostic factors is currently limited. This means that it is difficult to provide adequate information to families at diagnosis and during follow-up. Prognostic factors are also important for management as they can have an impact on the patient's outcome (time to intervention, choice of one molecule over another, etc.). Finally, few treatments are currently available for these epilepsies. One of the limitations to the development of treatments is the lack of real life data as it is difficult to create reliable primary endpoints such as the rate of patients becoming seizure free naturally compared to a therapeutic intervention. The aim of this real-life study is to evaluate the response to treatment as well as to see the evolution of cognitive and psychiatric comorbidities. As explained above, there are very few randomised trials except for 3 rare epilepsies (infantile spasm syndrome, Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome). This has led to the virtual absence of management recommendations, including for the three syndromes mentioned above, where attempts at treatment algorithms have been proposed, although these have not been able to be considered as evidence-based recommendations. As a result, there is some diversity in the management of rare epilepsies from one centre to another. However, this diversity in management can be an asset in a real-life study. This will make it possible to compare different management methods, both in terms of seizure control and medium-term outcome.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER
Orphelia Pharma
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis for rare epilepsy (based on ORPHA codes) * holders of parental authority not opposed * Be followed in one of the declared centers of the study

Exclusion criteria

* opposition from the holders of parental authority or the patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
rate of decrease in epileptic seizures5 yearsrate of decrease in epileptic seizures according to the treatments used based on the seizure calendar kept by the parents as part of the current care.

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTBlandine DOZIERES, Dr
blandine.dozieres@aphp.fr0140033667
STUDY_DIRECTORBlandine DOZIERES, Dr

Hopital Robert Debré - Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026