Skip to content

Effects of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation on Anxiety of Patients After COVID-19

Effects of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation on Anxiety of Patients After COVID-19 - a Randomised Controlled Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05126511
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-11-19
Start date
2021-11-19
Completion date
2022-03-31
Last updated
2023-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, POST-Covid 19

Keywords

Long-Covid/ Post-Covid, CES, fatigue, insomnia

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES), for one hour a day over 3 weeks pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program on symptoms of anxiety in post-Covid patients.

Detailed description

Many patients recovering from Covid-19 develop sequelae related to the disease. In addition to lung issues, symptoms of Post-Covid/Long-Covid Syndrome include fatigue, brain fog, amyosthenia, insomnia, anxiety and depression. These symptoms play a major role in post-Covid patients recovery. CES (Cranial electrotherapy stimulation) is a non-invasive therapy using low intensity alternating current applied through electrodes attached to the ear lobe. CES has been used to improve the condition of non covid patients suffering from depression, anxiety, fatigue and cognitive disabilities. This is thought to be due to a change in electric waves of the brain with an increase of alpha-waves and a decrease of beta- and delta-waves, as well as a change of concentration of neurotransmitters, e.g. beta-endorphin or serotonin. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of CES in addition to normal PR, compared to PR alone on symptoms (e.g. anxiety) in post-Covid patients. Hypothesis: Three weeks of PR including daily use of CES for one hour will have a positive effect on symptoms of anxiety. Trial: 40 patients post-Covid reffered to inpatient PR will be recruited and allocated to one of two different groups. Group1: Anxious participants, Group 2: Non anxious participants. Within groups particpants will be randomized to intervention or control/sham. Intervention group will be using a functional device, and the other using a non-functional, SHAM device. Anxiety is evaluated using the Beck anxiety inventory on admission and at discharge from PR. Questionnaires to evaluate fatigue, depression and insomnia are the Fatigue Assessment Scale, PHQ-9, PSQI). A diary will be kept by each participant with a log of general health and mood over the PR program.

Interventions

DEVICEApplication of CES via ear clips

Use of 100µA CES for one hour per day over PR program

DEVICESham: No application of CES via ear clips

Use of Sham CES for one hour per day over PR programm

Sponsors

Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Group with anxiety: * high Beck Anxiety Inventory Score * ≥18 years * post SARS-CoV-2 infection * written consent Group without anxiety: * low Beck Anxiety Inventory Score * ≥18 years * post SARS-CoV-2 infection * written consent

Exclusion criteria

* acitve implants (cardiac pacemaker,...) * pregnancy, lactation period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of symptoms of anxiety during interventionDay 1 and Day 21Comparison of the Beck Anxiety Inventory pre and post pulmonary rehabilitation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in fatigue during interventionDay 1 and Day 21Comparison of the FAS questionnaire pre and post pulmonary rehabilitation
Change in depression during interventionDay 1 and Day 21Comparison of the PHQ-9 questionnaire pre and post pulmonary rehabilitation
Change in insomnia during interventionDay 1 and Day 21Comparison of the PSQI questionnaire pre and post pulmonary rehabilitation
Subjective effectiveness of deviceDay 21Evaluation of the diary kept by the patient
Comfort while using the deviceDay 21Evaluation of the diary kept by the patient
Change of general condition/ perceived well-being of the patientDay 1 until Day 21Evaluation of the diary kept by the patient

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026