Skip to content

DETERMINE: Detemir vs NPH

A Phase 2 Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial Determir Vs Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) In Pregnant Women: DETERMINE Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05124457
Acronym
DETERMINE
Enrollment
336
Registered
2021-11-18
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2023-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Gestational Diabetes

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare rates of neonatal hypoglycemia with maternal NPH vs determir use.

Detailed description

Insulin detemir has been used and is FDA approved for type 1 diabetes in pregnancy women and its safety has been well established. At this point, the only long or intermediate acting medication that is approved for type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes is insulin NPH. The most serious side effect of insulin detemir is hypoglycemia but the rates of hypoglycemia are lower when comparted to NPH both during pregnancy and outside of pregnancy. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the most common diagnosis in pregnancy and its incidence is continuing to increase. Recent epidemiologic reports place the risk of pre-gestational diabetes at 1-2% and gestational diabetes (GDM) at 12.5%. Risk factors for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and GDM include obesity, hypertension, family history of diabetes, polycystic ovarian syndrome, or excessive weight gain in pregnancy. Suboptimal control of DM in pregnancy confers significant morbidity on both the mother and fetus, including increased risk of preeclampsia, preterm delivery, perineal lacerations, cesarean delivery, neonatal hypoglycemia, and NICU admissions.

Interventions

DRUGInsulin Detemir

Patients are to receive insulin detemir

DRUGInsulin NPH

Patients are to receive insulin NPH

Sponsors

University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomization to receive either insulin NPH or insulin detemir

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion criteria will include pregnant women with pre-existing T2DM and GDM who requiring insulin to manage their blood sugars in pregnancy.

Exclusion criteria

1. Multiple Gestation 2. Type 1 Diabetes mellatus 3. Age \< 18 4. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to NPH or insulin detemir 5. Known fetal major malformations 6. Chronic renal or hepatic insufficiency 7. Known to be HIV, Hepatitis B, or Hepatitis C positive 8. Indication for planned premature delivery (placenta accrete, or prior classical cesarean delivery) 9. Insulin dependent before conception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neonatal HypoglycemiaWithin the first 24 hours of lifeRate (%) of neonatal hypoglycemia
Prolonged neonatal hypoglycemiaNeonatal hypoglycemia after the 1st 24 hours of life but before dischargeRate (%) of prolonged neonatal hypoglycemia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neonatal insulin levelAt birthSample from cord blood
Neonatal leptin levelAt birthSample from cord blood
Rates of pregnancy induced hypertension1 yearMaternal rates of preeclampsia, eclampsia, or gestational hypertension
Mode of deliveryAt deliverySpontaneous vaginal, operative vaginal, cesarean
Gestational Age at deliveryAt deliveryGestational Age at delivery
Maternal glycemic control1 yearRate (%) of in range maternal blood glucose control in antepartum period
Total daily insulin1 yearTotal daily insulin dose in patient
Neonatal Gastrin LevelAt birthSample form cord blood
MacrosomiaAt birthRate (%) of macrosomia
PolyhydramniosAt birthRate (%) of polyhydramnios
Neonatal weightAt birthNeonatal weight
Need for supplemental oxygen1 yearRate of supplemental oxygen use (%) in neonate
Need for dextrose infusion in neonate1 yearRate of dextrose infusion use (%) in neonate
Rates of respiratory distress syndrome1 yearRate of RDS (%) in neonate
5 Minute APGARAt birth5 Minute APGAR
Fetal anomoliesAt birthRate (%) of fetal anomolies
Neonatal C-Peptide LevelAt birthSample from cord blood

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactMichael Richley, MD
mrichley@mednet.ucla.edu310-794-7274
Backup ContactChristina Han, MD
cshan@mednet.ucla.edu310-794-7274

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026