Skip to content

Goal-Directed Hemostatic Resuscitation Trial in ACLF Induced Coagulopathy

Thromboelastometry Guided Transfusion Protocol Versus Standard Care in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure With Bleeding: A Prospective Intervention Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05124041
Acronym
GOODHEART-ACLF
Enrollment
262
Registered
2021-11-17
Start date
2021-11-15
Completion date
2026-01-15
Last updated
2026-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute on Chronic Liver Failure, Cirrhosis, Liver, Thromboelastometry, Thrombosis;Portal, Variceal Hemorrhage

Brief summary

In this project, we plan to evaluate whether a new, rotational thromboelastometry-guided algorithm (ROTEM) to guide hemostatic resuscitation decreases the use of allogeneic blood products, the total amount of bleeding, transfusion related side effects, thromboembolic complications and costs. Its effect on each patient's post-operative hemostatic profile is also measured. We plan to enroll 260 patients having ACLF with variceal bleeding randomized into two groups: one will be treated conventionally using clinical judgement and standard coagulation tests such as prothrombin time, platelet count, etc. the other treated using a ROTEM-based algorithm. They will be followed for development of rebleeding, complications of transfusion and any signs of infection after hospitalization There will be a 'no intervention' group with well controlled bleeding who will undergo VETs but not be offered coagulation correction prophylactically in accordance with the Baveno VII consensus. This control group will be followed up in parallel with the main intervention groups. The ROTEM or SCT based correction will only be offered to patients who have high risk for rebleeding/ failure to control bleeding/ active bleeding at endoscopy/ need SEMS/TIPS and such individuals will be randomized to 2 arms ROTEM vs SCT, with 130 in each arm.

Detailed description

Patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) have coagulation failure in the setting of systemic inflammatory syndrome (SIRS), sepsis and extra-hepatic organ failures. The utility of thromboelastography/thromboelastometry currently has unvalidated clinical benefit in the assessment and reversal of coagulopathy among cirrhotic patients as compared to standard coagulation testing.Need for periprocedural blood transfusion is still high in patients with decompensated cirrhosis or ACLF who present with major bleeding. Allogeneic blood transfusion may be detrimental in patients with cirrhosis, due to volume overload and acute lung injury. Viscoelastic testing of global coagulation such as thromboelastometry has been proposed as a superior tool to rapidly diagnose and help guide resuscitation with blood products. In prior studies, we have clarified the pathophysiology of hemostasis in relation to the evidence of sepsis in liver disease and described the accuracy of various available laboratory tests in assessment of these patients. We have described the role of endogenous heparinoids in severe alcoholic hepatitis and the pathogenesis of the coagulation defect in ACLF. We determined the influence of sepsis on coagulation disorders in ACLF patients, to correctly identify the type and optimal quantity of blood product requirement in at risk patients.

Interventions

ROTEM-guided protocol of hemostatic resuscitation

Sponsors

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

260 patients having ACLF with bleeding will be randomized into two groups. One will be treated conventionally, i.e. using clinical judgement and conventional coagulation tests, the other treated using a ROTEM-based algorithm Revised Eligibility criteria as per Baveno VII ACLF with variceal bleeding with any indication for blood component transfusion as below Indications for transfusion in either arm are 1. Multiple sites of bleed e.g. diffuse mucosal ooze, post EVL ulcers, diffuse portal hypertensive gastropathy, etc which are associated with coagulation dysfunction against a background of portal hypertensive bleeding 2. Failure to control bleeding 3. Early rebleeding 4. Active bleeding on endoscopy with refractory variceal bleeding, need for balloon tamponade or self expandable metal stents (SEMS) 5. At the time of bridge therapy to a more definite treatment such as PTFE covered TIPS.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient with ACLF with variceal bleeding is eligible for the study if one or more of the criteria are met following primary endoscopic intervention. 1. Multiple sites of bleed e.g. diffuse mucosal ooze, post EVL ulcers, diffuse portal hypertensive gastropathy, etc which are associated with coagulation dysfunction against a background of portal hypertensive bleeding 2. Failure to control bleeding 3. Active bleeding on endoscopy with refractory variceal bleeding, need for balloon tamponade or self expandable metal stents (SEMS) 4. At the time of bridge therapy to a more definite treatment such as PTFE covered TIPS. If one of the above criteria is met, then the patient is enrolled provided they meet the criteria below. Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18-65 years * ACLF, as diagnosed by CANONIC/ APASL criteria . * Upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Exclusion criteria

* Current therapy: Recent blood or blood component transfusion in the last 2 weeks. * HIV positive/ AIDS patients * Patients requiring antiplatelet therapy, * Renal insufficiency requiring dialysis * Active malignancy within the last 5 years * Patient with other neurological disease and metabolic disorders, unbalanced heart failure and/or respiratory failure or end-stage renal disease * Administration of anticoagulants, antifibrinolytics, * Not willing to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with clinical control of bleeding24 hoursClinical control of bleeding at 24 hours, at Day 5 and day 42

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of Intensive care admission30 days after bleeding episode treated by transfusion protocol
Duration of hospital stay30 days after bleeding episode treated by transfusion protocol
Number of Participants with Transfusion-related side effects30 days after bleeding episode treated by transfusion protocol
Number of Participants with Thromboembolic events30 days after bleeding episode treated by transfusion protocol

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026