Skip to content

PREDICT: A PBRN Feasibility Study on COVID-19 Screening in Dental Practice

Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control Through Triage and Testing (PREDICT): A PBRN Feasibility Study on COVID-19 Screening in Dental

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05123742
Acronym
PREDICT
Enrollment
72
Registered
2021-11-17
Start date
2021-12-13
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19 Infection

Keywords

dental health care, antibody test, antigen test, dental practice environment, COVID-19 screening, point of care testing, lab-based testing, dental offices, pragmatic design

Brief summary

The study team will conduct a feasibility study to develop and test out procedures for improved triage and COVID-19 testing in dental practices to increase safety and perceptions of the safety of Dental Health Care Workers (DHCW) and their patients. DHCWs in offices with Practice-Based Regional Network (PBRN) members and their patients will be recruited to participate in one of two protocols. The first, point-of-care (POC), will test out procedures for point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing in the dental office along with enhanced triage using pulse oximeters. The second, laboratory (LAB), will test out procedures for a saliva-based laboratory SARS-CoV-2 viral test along with enhanced triage. The feasibility of implementing COVID-related testing and enhanced triage procedures in the dental setting will provide preliminary data to inform a larger network-wide study grant application.

Detailed description

Data derived from this research would enable dental health care workers to return to work, providing essential oral health care services in the safest possible environment. It will provide patients with confidence that they could resume seeking dental care under optimal conditions that ensure their well-being. The specific aims of this proposal are divided into three parts. The first aim is to apply the Delphi methodology, selecting a facilitator, a panel of experts, defining the problem, addressing the problem with several iterations, and coming to a consensus solution. The second aim is will address the concerns and recommended solutions proposed by the Delphi group and formulated into pragmatic improvements that can be applied to improved practice procedures that can be formulated into testable hypotheses that can be incorporated into a practice strategy for the future of dentistry. Pragmatic and novel methodological changes developed by the investigative team will be presented once again to the Delphi group to gain their approval and/or recommended modifications. Our overarching goal is to test these improved strategies in a pilot study and as such the investigators are looking to incorporate two to three methodological suggestions that can be fit into a pragmatic re-design of best dental practices. Thus, the third aim is designed to test these best dental practice approaches in a pilot study. The goal of the third aim is to evaluate how each of these strategies can be applied to different office settings. The data derived from this approach will be used to provide a sample size calculation for a larger study using the PBRN framework for office participation. The all-encompassing aim of the study is to develop a new way of approaching dental practice that ensures a sense of security and practicality for both patients and health professionals. The hypothesis to be tested derived from these aims relates to the structured development of several methodologies that can be applied to dental practice. These methodologic improvements in dental practice will be based on the most current scientific knowledge that can be applied to ensure safety in a dental office setting. To re-iterate the purpose of this study developed from the three aims proposed is to assess and compare each of the pragmatic models developed such that a sample size calculation can be computed. The pilot study design and the sample size calculation derived from this pilot data will compare two to three pragmatic/innovative modifications in the current practice guidelines and provide an estimate that can utilize the larger PBRN framework to best determine the generalizability of the models chosen for study.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCOVID-19 Testing

Testing for the SARS-CoV-2 virus

Sponsors

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
CollaboratorNIH
The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
Kaiser Foundation Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Rochester
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Illinois at Chicago
CollaboratorOTHER
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

A Dental Health Care Worker must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible to participate in the study: * Be 18 years or older * Be a National Dental PBRN member dentist or work in a dental office with a National Dental PBRN member dentist who consents to study participation * Be able to understand the informed consent. * Provide signed and dated informed consent form * Be able to understand all instructions for data collection instruments * Be willing and able to comply with all study procedures, including COVID-19 testing, and be available for the duration of the study A Patient must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible to participate in the study: * Be 18 years or older * Be able to understand the informed consent. * Have a computer or electronic tablet with internet access * Able to complete consent and questionnaire on a computer or electronic tablet * Provide signed and dated informed consent form * Be able to understand all instructions for data collection instruments * Be willing and able to comply with all study procedures, including having a COVID-19 test performed

Exclusion criteria

* Children less than 18 years will not be able to participate. * Participants would be excluded if they participated in the feasibility study previously conducted at Rutgers University.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perception of SafetyFor DHCW at Day 28 (+/- 14 days), For Patients at their dental visit (day 1)Participants perception of safety in the dental office. Outcome measure is a score on a scale from 0 to 100 where 0=has unsafe as one can possibly feel and 100=as safe as one can possibly feel. All participants (DHCW and patients) were asked to indicate how safe they would feel seeking dental care if all dental office workers, but not patients, were regularly tested: how safe they would feel seeking care if all patients, but not dental care workers, were tested prior to their dental appointments; and how safe they would feel seeking dental care if all dental workers were regularly tested AND all patients were tested prior to their dental appointments.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Testing Protocol PreferenceFor DHCWs at Day 28 (+/- 14 days); For Patients at time of their dental visit (Day 1)COVID-19 testing method preferred by subjects. Outcomes measure is a score on a scale where testing protocols are ranking from 1 to 4 with 1 being the most preferred method and 4 is the least preferred method. Score could not be used twice with the scores indicating the subject's testing preference.
Specimen PreferenceFor DHCWs at Day 28 (+/- 13 days); For patients at the time of their dental visit (Day 1)Ranking of the type of specimen participants preferred. Outcome measure is a score on a scale from 1 to 6 where 1=the most preferred specimen type and 6 the least preferred specimen type. Scores could not be used twice providing a ranking of specimen preference.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dental Healthcare Workers - POC
Dental Health Care Workers recruited who work in a participating dental office undergoing point-of-care testing
13
Dental Healthcare Workers - LAB
Dental Health Care Workers recruited who work in a participating dental office undergoing lab based testing
16
Patient - POC
Patients recruited who work in a participating dental office undergoing point-of-care testing
20
Patients-LAB
Patients recruited who work in a participating dental office undergoing lab based testing
23
Total72

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDental Healthcare Workers - POCDental Healthcare Workers - LABPatient - POCPatients-LABTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants3 Participants3 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants13 Participants17 Participants15 Participants57 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants6 Participants0 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants15 Participants14 Participants22 Participants59 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants15 Participants18 Participants20 Participants63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants13 Participants14 Participants13 Participants51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants3 Participants6 Participants10 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 150 / 190 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 150 / 190 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 150 / 190 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Perception of Safety

Participants perception of safety in the dental office. Outcome measure is a score on a scale from 0 to 100 where 0=has unsafe as one can possibly feel and 100=as safe as one can possibly feel. All participants (DHCW and patients) were asked to indicate how safe they would feel seeking dental care if all dental office workers, but not patients, were regularly tested: how safe they would feel seeking care if all patients, but not dental care workers, were tested prior to their dental appointments; and how safe they would feel seeking dental care if all dental workers were regularly tested AND all patients were tested prior to their dental appointments.

Time frame: For DHCW at Day 28 (+/- 14 days), For Patients at their dental visit (day 1)

Population: Only participants who completed the protocol have been included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Patients-POCPerception of SafetyPerception of safety when only patients are tested60 score on a scale
Patients-POCPerception of SafetyPerception of safety when both patients and DHCW are tested100 score on a scale
Patients-POCPerception of SafetyPerception of safety when only DHCW are tested95 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCPerception of SafetyPerception of safety when only patients are tested74 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCPerception of SafetyPerception of safety when both patients and DHCW are tested96 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCPerception of SafetyPerception of safety when only DHCW are tested82 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABPerception of SafetyPerception of safety when only DHCW are tested60 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABPerception of SafetyPerception of safety when only patients are tested51 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABPerception of SafetyPerception of safety when both patients and DHCW are tested75 score on a scale
Patients - LABPerception of SafetyPerception of safety when only patients are tested52.5 score on a scale
Patients - LABPerception of SafetyPerception of safety when both patients and DHCW are tested93 score on a scale
Patients - LABPerception of SafetyPerception of safety when only DHCW are tested71 score on a scale
Secondary

Specimen Preference

Ranking of the type of specimen participants preferred. Outcome measure is a score on a scale from 1 to 6 where 1=the most preferred specimen type and 6 the least preferred specimen type. Scores could not be used twice providing a ranking of specimen preference.

Time frame: For DHCWs at Day 28 (+/- 13 days); For patients at the time of their dental visit (Day 1)

Population: Analysis population is limited to those participants who completed the protocol

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Patients-POCSpecimen PreferenceSaliva1 score on a scale
Patients-POCSpecimen PreferenceTongue Epithelial Cells2 score on a scale
Patients-POCSpecimen PreferenceNasal Swab2 score on a scale
Patients-POCSpecimen PreferenceNasal-Pharyngeal Swab4 score on a scale
Patients-POCSpecimen PreferenceFinger Stick (Capillary Blood)5 score on a scale
Patients-POCSpecimen PreferenceVenous Blood6 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCSpecimen PreferenceVenous Blood6 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCSpecimen PreferenceNasal-Pharyngeal Swab4 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCSpecimen PreferenceSaliva2 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCSpecimen PreferenceNasal Swab3 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCSpecimen PreferenceTongue Epithelial Cells2 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCSpecimen PreferenceFinger Stick (Capillary Blood)5 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABSpecimen PreferenceTongue Epithelial Cells2 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABSpecimen PreferenceNasal Swab1 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABSpecimen PreferenceNasal-Pharyngeal Swab6 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABSpecimen PreferenceVenous Blood6 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABSpecimen PreferenceFinger Stick (Capillary Blood)5 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABSpecimen PreferenceSaliva3 score on a scale
Patients - LABSpecimen PreferenceFinger Stick (Capillary Blood)5 score on a scale
Patients - LABSpecimen PreferenceVenous Blood6 score on a scale
Patients - LABSpecimen PreferenceTongue Epithelial Cells2 score on a scale
Patients - LABSpecimen PreferenceNasal-Pharyngeal Swab4 score on a scale
Patients - LABSpecimen PreferenceSaliva2 score on a scale
Patients - LABSpecimen PreferenceNasal Swab2 score on a scale
Secondary

Testing Protocol Preference

COVID-19 testing method preferred by subjects. Outcomes measure is a score on a scale where testing protocols are ranking from 1 to 4 with 1 being the most preferred method and 4 is the least preferred method. Score could not be used twice with the scores indicating the subject's testing preference.

Time frame: For DHCWs at Day 28 (+/- 14 days); For Patients at time of their dental visit (Day 1)

Population: Only participants who completed the protocol are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Patients-POCTesting Protocol PreferenceSpecimen collected at home and mailed to the lab for processing2 score on a scale
Patients-POCTesting Protocol PreferencePoint-of-care test in the dental office1 score on a scale
Patients-POCTesting Protocol PreferenceSpecimen collected in the dnetal office and mail to the lab for processing3 score on a scale
Patients-POCTesting Protocol PreferenceSpecimen collected at a commercial lab and processed at the lab4 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCTesting Protocol PreferencePoint-of-care test in the dental office3 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCTesting Protocol PreferenceSpecimen collected in the dnetal office and mail to the lab for processing2 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCTesting Protocol PreferenceSpecimen collected at a commercial lab and processed at the lab4 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - POCTesting Protocol PreferenceSpecimen collected at home and mailed to the lab for processing1 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABTesting Protocol PreferenceSpecimen collected in the dnetal office and mail to the lab for processing3 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABTesting Protocol PreferencePoint-of-care test in the dental office2 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABTesting Protocol PreferenceSpecimen collected at a commercial lab and processed at the lab4 score on a scale
Dental Healthcare Workers - LABTesting Protocol PreferenceSpecimen collected at home and mailed to the lab for processing2 score on a scale
Patients - LABTesting Protocol PreferenceSpecimen collected at a commercial lab and processed at the lab4 score on a scale
Patients - LABTesting Protocol PreferencePoint-of-care test in the dental office2.5 score on a scale
Patients - LABTesting Protocol PreferenceSpecimen collected at home and mailed to the lab for processing1 score on a scale
Patients - LABTesting Protocol PreferenceSpecimen collected in the dnetal office and mail to the lab for processing2 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026