Skip to content

A Study To Assess the Safety and Efficacy of JZP385 in the Treatment of Adults With Moderate to Severe Essential Tremor (ET)

A Phase 2b, 12-week, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study of the Safety and Efficacy of JZP385 in the Treatment of Adults With Moderate to Severe Essential Tremor

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05122650
Enrollment
420
Registered
2021-11-17
Start date
2021-12-06
Completion date
2024-05-30
Last updated
2025-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Essential Tremor

Keywords

JZP385, T-type calcium channels, Movement disorder, Tremor, Moderate to severe essential tremor

Brief summary

This is a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of JZP385 in the treatment of adult participants with moderate to severe ET.

Interventions

DRUGJZP385

JZP385 capsules will be administered orally (PO) once daily in the morning on an empty stomach for 12 weeks.

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo capsules will be administered orally (PO) once daily in the morning on an empty stomach for 12 weeks.

Sponsors

Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participant must be 18 to 80 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent. 2. Participants who are diagnosed with ET (including ET plus) according to the MDS Consensus Statement on the Classification of Tremors from the Task Force on Tremor of the International Parkinson's and Movement Disorder Society. 3. Participants have moderate to severe disability associated with tremor as determined by a score of ≥ 22 on the TETRAS-ADL subscale and a CGI-S rating of at least moderate for participants' ability to function. 4. Sex and Contraceptive/Barrier Requirements During the study intervention and for at least 30 days after the last dose of study intervention male participants must refrain from donating sperm. Non-abstinent males must agree to use a male condom in combination with female partner use of a highly effective contraceptive method with a failure rate of \< 1% per year. All male participants must agree to use a male condom when engaging in any activity that allows for passage of ejaculate to another person. Female participants must not be pregnant or breastfeeding, are either women of non-childbearing potential (WONCBP), or are women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) using a highly effective contraceptive method with a failure rate of \< 1% during the study intervention period and for at least 30 days after the last dose of study intervention. Male partners of WOCBP are required to use barrier protection, eg, condoms, from the first dose of study intervention until 30 days after the last dose of study intervention. A WOCBP must have a negative highly sensitive serum pregnancy test at Screening Visit 1 and negative urine pregnancy tests (unless serum is required by local regulations) at the Screening Visit 2 (if applicable) and at the Baseline Visit \- If a urine test cannot be confirmed as negative (eg, an ambiguous result), a serum pregnancy test is required. In such cases, the participant must be excluded from participation if the serum pregnancy result is positive. 5. Prior/Concomitant Antitremor Medications If currently treated with antitremor medications, potential participants must be on a stable dosage for at least 6 weeks prior to Screening and must not anticipate making any changes to their antitremor medication for the duration of the study. Note: Treatment with some antitremor medications (eg, primidone) is not allowed in accordance with other

Exclusion criteria

.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS Composite Outcome Score as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboChange from baseline to week 12The TETRAS composite outcome score is the sum of modified items 1 - 11 of the TETRAS-ADL subscale and modified items 6 - 7 of the TETRAS-PS. The TETRAS-ADL subscale is a patient-rated scale administered by a trained interviewer that assesses the impact of tremor on day-to-day functioning, such as eating, drinking, dressing, and other fine motor skills. The TETRAS-PS is a clinical rating scale that quantifies tremor in the head, face voice, limbs and trunk. Items 6 (drawing an Archimedes spiral using left and right hands) and 7 (handwriting) of the TETRAS-PS evaluate the impact of upper limb tremor on performance. Each item from the modified subscales ranges from 0 - 3, with 0 representing normal or slightly abnormal and 3 representing severely abnormal. The sum of the 14 items provides the TETRAS composite outcome score, which ranges from 0 - 42, with higher scores representing more severe ET.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants Reported as Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Week 12Week 12The CGI-C is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale that a qualified medical personnel (ie, a clinician) will use to rate the change in severity of the participants' ability to function due to their ET since baseline. The responses to this scale range from 1 (Much improved) to 5 (Much worse).
Proportion of Participants Reported as Much Improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 12Change from baseline to week 12The PGI-C is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale that participants use to rate the change in severity of their ability to function due to ET since baseline. The responses to this scale range from 1 (Much improved) to 5 (Much worse).
Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS-ADL Subscale as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboChange from baseline to week 12The TETRAS-ADL subscale is a patient-rated scale of the impact of tremor on day-to-day functioning administered by a trained interviewer. The TETRAS-ADL subscale directly measures how a patient functions by assessing activities impacted by tremor, such as eating and drinking, dressing and personal hygiene, carrying items and fine motor skills. The TETRAS-ADL has 12 items, and each item is rated on a 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) scale with a total score ranging from 0 to 48. A higher score represents more severe ET.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS-PS Subscale as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboChange from baseline to week 12The TETRAS-PS is a clinical rating scale performed by a blinded rater that quantifies tremor in the head, face, voice, limbs, and trunk. Each item will be rated on a scale of 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). The sum of the individual scores provides the overall score, ranging from 0 to 64, with higher scores representing more severe ET.
Percentage of Participants Who Improved (≥ 1-Point Improvement) From Baseline to Week 12 on the Clinical Global Impression- Severity Scale (CGI-S)Change from baseline to week 12The CGI-S is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale that a qualified medical personnel (ie, a clinician)will use to rate the severity of the participants' ability to function due to their ET. The responses to this scale range from 1 (no limitations) to 5 (severe).
Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS Total Score, as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo.Change from baseline to week 12The TETRAS total score is the sum of the scores of the full TETRAS-ADL and TETRAS-PS subscales. Each item is rated on a 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) scale, and total scores range from 0 to 112, with higher scores representing more severe ET. The TETRAS-PS is performed by a blinded rater.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboChange from baseline to week 12The Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) was developed to specifically assess the impact of ET on health-related quality of life. The QUEST is a 30-item questionnaire comprising 5 subscales (physical, psychosocial, communication, hobbies/leisure, and work/finance). Each item is rated by frequency on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Each dimension had been standardized to a range of 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater dissatisfaction or disability due to ET.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) Score A as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboChange from baseline to week 12The Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) is a participant-rated questionnaire administered by a health care provider or researcher that contains 14-items assessing embarrassment related to tremor. For Score A, participants provide a simple response (disagree or agree) to each of the 14-items, the sum of which yields an initial score range = 0 to 14. Higher scores indicate greater embarrassment
Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) Score B as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboChange from baseline to week 12The Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) is a participant-rated questionnaire administered by a health care provider or researcher that contains 14-items assessing embarrassment related to tremor. For Score B, participants provide a more nuanced response to each question on a 0 to 5 point Likert scale ranging from disagree (0) to agree strongly (5). The sum of the nuanced responses yields a second score (range = 0 to 70). Higher scores indicate greater embarrassment
Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Upper Limb Score (Item 4) of the TETRAS-PS as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboChange from baseline to week 12Item 4 of the TETRAS-PS measures upper limb tremor, and includes 3 maneuvers for each arm that assess postural and kinetic tremor. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) in 0.5-point increments. The total score is the sum of each of the 6 items and ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores representing more severe ET. The TETRAS-PS is performed by a blinded rater.

Countries

Germany, Poland, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 420 participants were randomized to treatment. These 420 participants are included in the Intent to Treat Analysis set (ITT). Of those 420 participants, only 416 received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Four participants did not receive any treatment. These 416 participants are included in the Safet Analysis Set

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants will receive placebo from Day 1.
104
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385
Participants will initially receive 5 mg/day from Day 1 through Day 7, and 10 mg/day starting on Day 8.
105
20 mg JZP385
Participants will initially receive 5 mg/day from Day 1 through Day 7, 10 mg/day from Day 8 through Day 14, and 20 mg/day starting on Day 15.
104
30 mg JZP385
Participants will initially receive 5 mg/day from Day 1 through Day 7, 10 mg/day from Day 8 through Day 14, 20 mg/day from Day 15 through Day 21, and 30 mg/day starting on Day 22.
107
Total420

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event4161112
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy0112
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1130
Overall StudyNon-compliance with study intervention0002
Overall StudyOther5000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0101
Overall StudyRandomized by mistake0032
Overall StudySponsor request0112
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3748

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo10 Milligram (mg) JZP38520 mg JZP38530 mg JZP385Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
61 Participants54 Participants59 Participants59 Participants233 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
43 Participants51 Participants45 Participants48 Participants187 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants10 Participants9 Participants11 Participants41 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
93 Participants95 Participants95 Participants96 Participants379 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants7 Participants6 Participants9 Participants27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
98 Participants96 Participants93 Participants92 Participants379 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants37 Participants33 Participants49 Participants160 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
63 Participants68 Participants71 Participants58 Participants260 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1040 / 1040 / 1030 / 105
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 10435 / 10435 / 10346 / 105
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1043 / 1044 / 1034 / 105

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS Composite Outcome Score as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo

The TETRAS composite outcome score is the sum of modified items 1 - 11 of the TETRAS-ADL subscale and modified items 6 - 7 of the TETRAS-PS. The TETRAS-ADL subscale is a patient-rated scale administered by a trained interviewer that assesses the impact of tremor on day-to-day functioning, such as eating, drinking, dressing, and other fine motor skills. The TETRAS-PS is a clinical rating scale that quantifies tremor in the head, face voice, limbs and trunk. Items 6 (drawing an Archimedes spiral using left and right hands) and 7 (handwriting) of the TETRAS-PS evaluate the impact of upper limb tremor on performance. Each item from the modified subscales ranges from 0 - 3, with 0 representing normal or slightly abnormal and 3 representing severely abnormal. The sum of the 14 items provides the TETRAS composite outcome score, which ranges from 0 - 42, with higher scores representing more severe ET.

Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

Population: The primary outcome was assessed in participants in the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis population set that completed the baseline and week 12 TETRAS assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS Composite Outcome Score as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.22
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS Composite Outcome Score as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.85
20 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS Composite Outcome Score as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.88
30 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS Composite Outcome Score as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-7.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.31
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) Score A as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo

The Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) is a participant-rated questionnaire administered by a health care provider or researcher that contains 14-items assessing embarrassment related to tremor. For Score A, participants provide a simple response (disagree or agree) to each of the 14-items, the sum of which yields an initial score range = 0 to 14. Higher scores indicate greater embarrassment

Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

Population: The outcome was assessed in participants in the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis population set that completed the baseline and week 12 ETEA assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 on the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) Score A as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) Score A as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
20 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) Score A as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
30 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) Score A as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.51
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) Score B as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo

The Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) is a participant-rated questionnaire administered by a health care provider or researcher that contains 14-items assessing embarrassment related to tremor. For Score B, participants provide a more nuanced response to each question on a 0 to 5 point Likert scale ranging from disagree (0) to agree strongly (5). The sum of the nuanced responses yields a second score (range = 0 to 70). Higher scores indicate greater embarrassment

Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

Population: The outcome was assessed in participants in the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis population set that completed the baseline and week 12 ETEA assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 on the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) Score B as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.87
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) Score B as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.15
20 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) Score B as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.42
30 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Essential Tremor Embarrassment Assessment (ETEA) Score B as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.28
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo

The Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) was developed to specifically assess the impact of ET on health-related quality of life. The QUEST is a 30-item questionnaire comprising 5 subscales (physical, psychosocial, communication, hobbies/leisure, and work/finance). Each item is rated by frequency on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Each dimension had been standardized to a range of 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater dissatisfaction or disability due to ET.

Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

Population: The outcome was assessed in participants in the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis population set that completed the baseline and week 12 QUEST assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboPhysical Subscale Total Score-11.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboWork and Finance Subscale Total Score-5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.44
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboPsychosocial Subscale Total Score-6.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboHobbies and Leisure Subscale Total Score-1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboCommunication Subscale Total Score-5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.35
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboHobbies and Leisure Subscale Total Score-8.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.66
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboPhysical Subscale Total Score-5.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboPsychosocial Subscale Total Score-2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.57
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboWork and Finance Subscale Total Score1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.26
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboCommunication Subscale Total Score-3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.62
20 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboHobbies and Leisure Subscale Total Score-3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.5
20 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboCommunication Subscale Total Score-3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.67
20 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboWork and Finance Subscale Total Score-6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.61
20 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboPhysical Subscale Total Score-10.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.85
20 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboPsychosocial Subscale Total Score-6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.79
30 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboPhysical Subscale Total Score-13.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.24
30 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboWork and Finance Subscale Total Score-6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.11
30 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboCommunication Subscale Total Score-7.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.18
30 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboHobbies and Leisure Subscale Total Score-10.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.81
30 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and PlaceboPsychosocial Subscale Total Score-6.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS-ADL Subscale as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo

The TETRAS-ADL subscale is a patient-rated scale of the impact of tremor on day-to-day functioning administered by a trained interviewer. The TETRAS-ADL subscale directly measures how a patient functions by assessing activities impacted by tremor, such as eating and drinking, dressing and personal hygiene, carrying items and fine motor skills. The TETRAS-ADL has 12 items, and each item is rated on a 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) scale with a total score ranging from 0 to 48. A higher score represents more severe ET.

Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

Population: The outcome was assessed in participants in the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis population set that completed the baseline and week 12 TETRAS-ADL assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS-ADL Subscale as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-6.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS-ADL Subscale as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.55
20 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS-ADL Subscale as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-7.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.88
30 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS-ADL Subscale as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-8.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.49
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS-PS Subscale as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo

The TETRAS-PS is a clinical rating scale performed by a blinded rater that quantifies tremor in the head, face, voice, limbs, and trunk. Each item will be rated on a scale of 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). The sum of the individual scores provides the overall score, ranging from 0 to 64, with higher scores representing more severe ET.

Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

Population: The outcome was assessed in participants in the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis population set that completed the baseline and week 12 TETRAS-PS subscale assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS-PS Subscale as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-5.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.73
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS-PS Subscale as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-5.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.57
20 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS-PS Subscale as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-5.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.15
30 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS-PS Subscale as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS Total Score, as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo.

The TETRAS total score is the sum of the scores of the full TETRAS-ADL and TETRAS-PS subscales. Each item is rated on a 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) scale, and total scores range from 0 to 112, with higher scores representing more severe ET. The TETRAS-PS is performed by a blinded rater.

Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

Population: The outcome was assessed in participants in the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis population set that completed the baseline and week 12 TETRAS Total assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS Total Score, as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo.-11.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.18
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS Total Score, as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo.-11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.54
20 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS Total Score, as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo.-12.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.95
30 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the TETRAS Total Score, as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo.-14.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Upper Limb Score (Item 4) of the TETRAS-PS as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo

Item 4 of the TETRAS-PS measures upper limb tremor, and includes 3 maneuvers for each arm that assess postural and kinetic tremor. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) in 0.5-point increments. The total score is the sum of each of the 6 items and ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores representing more severe ET. The TETRAS-PS is performed by a blinded rater.

Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

Population: The outcome was assessed in participants in the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis population set that completed the baseline and week 12 Upper limb score on the TETRAS-PS assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 on the Upper Limb Score (Item 4) of the TETRAS-PS as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Upper Limb Score (Item 4) of the TETRAS-PS as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
20 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Upper Limb Score (Item 4) of the TETRAS-PS as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
30 mg JZP385Change From Baseline to Week 12 on the Upper Limb Score (Item 4) of the TETRAS-PS as Summarized by Each Dose of JZP385 and Placebo-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Improved (≥ 1-Point Improvement) From Baseline to Week 12 on the Clinical Global Impression- Severity Scale (CGI-S)

The CGI-S is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale that a qualified medical personnel (ie, a clinician)will use to rate the severity of the participants' ability to function due to their ET. The responses to this scale range from 1 (no limitations) to 5 (severe).

Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

Population: Inferential analysis results were based on multiple imputations (impute missing values) on all study population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Improved (≥ 1-Point Improvement) From Baseline to Week 12 on the Clinical Global Impression- Severity Scale (CGI-S)50.0 Percentage of participants
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Percentage of Participants Who Improved (≥ 1-Point Improvement) From Baseline to Week 12 on the Clinical Global Impression- Severity Scale (CGI-S)49.8 Percentage of participants
20 mg JZP385Percentage of Participants Who Improved (≥ 1-Point Improvement) From Baseline to Week 12 on the Clinical Global Impression- Severity Scale (CGI-S)55.7 Percentage of participants
30 mg JZP385Percentage of Participants Who Improved (≥ 1-Point Improvement) From Baseline to Week 12 on the Clinical Global Impression- Severity Scale (CGI-S)62.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Reported as Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Week 12

The CGI-C is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale that a qualified medical personnel (ie, a clinician) will use to rate the change in severity of the participants' ability to function due to their ET since baseline. The responses to this scale range from 1 (Much improved) to 5 (Much worse).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The outcome was assessed in participants in the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis population set that completed the baseline and week 12 CGI-C assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboProportion of Participants Reported as Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Week 1222 Participants
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Proportion of Participants Reported as Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Week 1218 Participants
20 mg JZP385Proportion of Participants Reported as Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Week 1219 Participants
30 mg JZP385Proportion of Participants Reported as Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Week 1230 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Reported as Much Improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 12

The PGI-C is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale that participants use to rate the change in severity of their ability to function due to ET since baseline. The responses to this scale range from 1 (Much improved) to 5 (Much worse).

Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

Population: The outcome was assessed in participants in the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis population set that completed the baseline and week 12 PGI-C assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboProportion of Participants Reported as Much Improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 1216 Participants
10 Milligram (mg) JZP385Proportion of Participants Reported as Much Improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 1211 Participants
20 mg JZP385Proportion of Participants Reported as Much Improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 1220 Participants
30 mg JZP385Proportion of Participants Reported as Much Improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 1232 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026