Leg Length Inequality
Conditions
Keywords
leg length inequality, leg length discrepancy, EOS 2D/3D, physical examination, length measurement
Brief summary
There are numerous ways to measure limb length discrepancy in the clinical practice, although their reliability and accuracy are not well known. In our prospective diagnostic study we aimed to test the most popular methods and compare their results to EOS 3D reconstructions data.
Interventions
EOS Micro Dose imaging will be done. SterEOS lower limb alignment reconstruction will be performed measuring the lim length.
Clinical measurement of both lower limbs' length, 3 times in 3 different days by 3 observers. * bony markers position (heel contour, patella and medial malleolus) in resupinate and side position also * tape measuring: * Spina iliaca anterior superior - medial malleolus * umbilicus - medial malleolus * greater trochanter - lateral malleolus * in standing, sitting, resupinate and side position
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age: 18-30 years * BMI: \< 30 * Without orthopaedic complaint
Exclusion criteria
* Previous surgery on lower limb or spine * Developmental disorder in the patients history
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Radiological limb length | 6 months | Limb length based on SterEOS 3D measurement |
| Intra- and interobserver reliability of the clinical lower limb measurements methods | 6 months | Intra- and interobserver reliability of clinical length measuring methods will be calculated using the 3 separated measurement of the 3 observers. |
| Accuracy of the clinical lower limb measurements methods | 6 months | Comparing the results of the radiological and clinical limb length results using the third measurement of the observers. |
Countries
Hungary