Dentin Hypersensitivity
Conditions
Keywords
OLiNano SEAL, Curodont D'Senz, Dentin Hypersensitivity, Dye penetration, Dentin permeability
Brief summary
This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the efficacy of Olinanoseal and Curodont D'Senz in treatment of dentin hypersensitivity.
Detailed description
Materials and Methods:- A total of ninety (90) samples were used in the study, for dentin permeability test (dye penetration test) and Scanning Electron Microscopic examination (SEM) which were randomly divided into two main groups; group A1, completely removed smear layer, group A2, partially removed smear layer. Each group was subdivided into three subgroups according to the desensitizing agent applied: OliNano SEAL, Curodont D'Senz and the control group that were left untreated. Seventy (70) hypersensitive teeth in ten patients were enrolled for the current study. The subjective assessment of dentin hypersensitivity was done prior to the application of the desensitizing agent (baseline) then immediately, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 3 months after application of the tested materials. Patients were informed to rate their perception to tactile, air and cold stimuli by using Verbal Rating Score (VRS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Interventions
DRUGOlinanoseal
it contains nanometer particles of fluoroapatite and calcium fluoride - guarantees the resistance to cracks and abrasion. At the same time insoluble nano-fluoroapatites fill all enamel microcracks and closes open dentinal tubules.
DRUGCurodont D'senz
This agent contains p 11-4 peptide in addition to fluoride
Sponsors
Al-Azhar University
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)
Masking description
they don't know the type of intervention used
Intervention model description
A total of ninety (90) samples were used in the study, for dentin permeability test (dye penetration test) and Scanning Electron Microscopic examination (SEM) which were randomly divided into two main groups; group A1, completely removed smear layer, group A2, partially removed smear layer. Each group was subdivided into three subgroups according to the desensitizing agent applied: OliNano SEAL, Curodont D'Senz and the control group that were left untreated. Seventy (70) hypersensitive teeth in ten patients were enrolled for the current study. The subjective assessment of dentin hypersensitivity was done prior to the application of the desensitizing agent (baseline) then immediately, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 3 months after application of the tested materials. Patients were informed to rate their perception to tactile, air and cold stimuli by using Verbal Rating Score (VRS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Presence of a minimum of four hypersensitive teeth in each patient. 2. Patients with teeth recorded a discomfort score of two or more to tactile, cold and air stimulation. 3. Teeth having hypersensitivity only on the facial aspect. 4. Patients' willingness to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients with any medical or dental condition that could impact the study results during its expected length. 2. Patients with a history of drug addictions and use of potent analgesic and/ or anti-inflammatory drugs. 3. Patients who refused to give their consents. 4. Patients with any extensive or unsatisfactory restorations, prosthesis or orthodontic appliances which involve the cervical areas
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| dentin hypersensitivity | 2 minutes | pain score (visual analogue scale VAS \[minmum =0 {best}, maximum=10 {worst}\] and verbal rating scale VRS \[minmum =0 {best}, maximum=4 {worst}\]) |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed