Skip to content

Evaluation of Two Different Types of Zirconia Crowns Used in Carious Primary Anterior Teeth

Evaluation of Two Different Types of Zirconia Crowns Used in Carious Primary Anterior Teeth

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05121584
Enrollment
25
Registered
2021-11-16
Start date
2020-11-20
Completion date
2022-03-21
Last updated
2021-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries in Children

Keywords

Zirconia crowns in pediatric dentistry, Dental caries, Aesthetic primary teeth restoration

Brief summary

Evaluation of two different types of zirconia crowns ( Kinder Krown , Nusmile crown) used in carious primary anterior teeth

Detailed description

Assess the clinical and radiographic evaluation of Kinder Krowns and Nusmile crowns in restoring carious primary canines And compare between the two crowns used

Interventions

PROCEDUREPlacement of an anterior crown restoration as a final restoration

Placement of an anterior crown restoration as a final restoration

Sponsors

Arig Samir Abdelmonem Shawky
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Children age ranging from 7 to 10 years * Deep carious primary upper canines * The tooth need pulpal treatment * The tooth need a crown restoration * The tooth not submerged * The tooth is not mobile

Exclusion criteria

* Children with bruxism or deep bite * Children with especial need * Presence of pathological root resorption in preoperative x-ray * Presence of tooth wear (abrasion/attrition) on the opposing teeth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Crown retention12 monthsChange in the following clinical assessment measure between baseline and 12 months using the scale below A=Intact B=Chipped/small but noticeable areas of loss of material C=Large loss of material D=Complete loss of crown
Opposing tooth wear12 monthsBinary (Yes/No)
Gingival health12 monthsChange in the following clinical assessment measure between baseline and 12 months using the scale below A=No inflammation B=Mild inflammation C=Moderate inflammation D=Marked inflammation
Immediate color match12 monthsA=No noticeable difference from adjacent teeth B=Slight shade mismatch C=Obvious shade mismatch
Gingival index (Loe and Silness)12 monthsChange in the following clinical assessment measure between baseline and 12 months using the scale below 0=Normal gingiva(natural colour pink gingiva no inflammation) 1=Mild inflammation(slight changes in colour,slight edema,no bleeding on probing) 2=Moderate inflammation(redness, edema and glazing, bleeding upon probing 3=Severe inflammation(marked redness and edema/ulceration/tendency to bleed spontaneously
Crown margins12 monthsChange in the following clinical assessment measure between baseline and 12 months using the scale below A=Continuous with the contour of the crown, nice adaptation B=Slight overhang or under contour present C=Large defects noted D=Restoration missing
Child/parent satisfaction12 monthsBinary(Yes/No)
Pathological external/internal root resorption12 monthsBinary(Present/Absent)
Periapical radiolucency12 monthsBinary(Present/Absent)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026