Seizures
Conditions
Keywords
Child, Emergency Medical Services
Brief summary
The Pediatric Dose Optimization for Seizures in Emergency Medical Services (PediDOSE) study is designed to improve how paramedics treat seizures in children on ambulances. Seizures are one of the most common reasons why people call an ambulance for a child, and paramedics typically administer midazolam to stop the seizure. One-third of children with active seizures on ambulances arrive at emergency departments still seizing. Prior research suggests that seizures on ambulances continue due to under-dosing and delayed delivery of medication. Under-dosing happens when calculation errors occur, and delayed medication delivery occurs due to the time required for dose calculation and placement of an intravenous line to give the medication. Seizures stop quickly when standardized medication doses are given as a muscular injection or a nasal spray. This research has primarily been done in adults, and evidence is needed to determine if this is effective and safe in children. PediDOSE optimizes how paramedics choose the midazolam dose by eliminating calculations and making the dose age-based. This study involves changing the seizure treatment protocols for ambulance services in 20 different cities, in a staggered and randomly-assigned manner. One aim of PediDOSE is to determine if using age to select one of four standardized doses of midazolam and giving it as a muscular injection or nasal spray is more effective than the current calculation-based method, as measured by the number of children arriving at emergency departments still seizing. The investigators believe that a standardized seizure protocol with age-based doses is more effective than current practice. Another aim of PediDOSE is to determine if a standardized seizure protocol with age-based doses is just as safe as current practice, since either ongoing seizures or receiving too much midazolam can interfere with breathing. The investigators believe that a standardized seizure protocol with age-based doses is just as safe as current practice, since the seizures may stop faster and these doses are safely used in children in other healthcare settings. If this study demonstrates that standardized, age-based midazolam dosing is equally safe and more effective in comparison to current practice, the potential impact of this study is a shift in the treatment of pediatric seizures that can be easily implemented in ambulance services across the United States and in other parts of the world.
Interventions
The intervention is a standardized seizure protocol for paramedics that prioritizes administration of only intramuscular (IM) or intranasal (IN) midazolam, up to 2 doses given 5 minutes apart, with age-based dosing as follows: 6-16 months (1.25 mg); 17 months-5 years (2.5 mg); 6-11 years (5 mg); 12-13 years (10 mg).
The control is the EMS agency's current seizure protocol, based on conventional calculation-based dosing. These vary from one EMS agency to the other with respect to recommended midazolam doses ranging from 0.05-0.3 mg/kg and with multiple route choices listed, including intravenous, intraosseous, intramuscular, intranasal, and rectal. for paramedics that prioritizes administration of only intramuscular (IM) or intranasal (IN) midazolam, up to 2 doses given 5 minutes apart, with age-based dosing as follows: 6-16 months (1.25 mg); 17 months-5 years (2.5 mg); 6-11 years (5 mg); 12-13 years (10 mg).
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Neurologists will assess the primary outcome of seizing on emergency department arrival using a rapid response electroencephalogram (RR-EEG) that is applied to the patient's scalp upon arrival. Site-specific identifiers will not be available to the neurologist when reading the RR-EEG, so they will be masked to whether the patient was treated under the conventional or standardized protocol. Since the participants' parents will likely see how the paramedics select the midazolam dose and may share that with the participant, they will not be masked to the intervention. The paramedics are the care providers, and they will not be masked to the intervention since their medical director must inform them when their seizure treatment protocol switches from the conventional to the standardized protocol. The investigators will not be masked because they will conduct the training of the paramedic trainers at each site between randomization and implementation of the intervention.
Intervention model description
This is a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial. Every 2 months, 1 of the 20 sites will transition, in a staggered manner, from the control (conventional protocol with calculation-based dosing) to the intervention (standardized protocol with age-based dosing), such that all 20 sites will ultimately implement the intervention during the 4-year enrollment period.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Witnessed by the paramedic to be actively seizing, regardless of seizure type or duration; AND * Under the care of a paramedic; AND * Transported by an EMS agency participating in the study
Exclusion criteria
* A prior history of a benzodiazepine allergy; OR * Known or presumed pregnancy; OR * Severe growth restriction based on the paramedic's subjective assessment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Seizing on emergency department arrival | Between arrival to the emergency department and 10 minutes after arrival | Binary assessment of whether the participant is seizing or not upon arrival to the emergency department, as measured by either a rapid response electroencephalogram (preferred) or clinical judgement (alternative). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Respiratory failure | Between paramedic arrival on scene until 30 minutes after emergency department arrival | A binary assessment of insufficient breathing at any point during EMS care or within 30 minutes of emergency department arrival, defined as having received bag valve mask ventilation, bi-level positive airway pressure, placement of a supraglottic airway or endotracheal intubation. |
| Time to first midazolam administration | From paramedic arrival to the scene until emergency department arrival, assessed up to 1 hour after paramedic scene arrival or 1 minute after emergency department arrival, whichever occurs last | Time in minutes from paramedic arrival to the scene until the paramedic administers midazolam to the patient |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia | Between paramedic midazolam administration and hospital discharge, assessed up to 24 hours | A binary assessment of whether or not the patient's heart rhythm changed to require intervention with chest compressions, pacing, defibrillation, or the use of an anti-arrhythmic agent or procedure. |
| Time to seizure cessation in the emergency department | From emergency department arrival until emergency department departure, assessed up to 24 hours after emergency department arrival | For participants who are seizing upon emergency department arrival, this is the time in minutes that it takes for the seizure to stop, as determined by the rapid response electroencephalogram (preferred) or clinical judgement (alternative) |
| Depressed level of consciousness | Between paramedic midazolam administration and 4 hours after emergency department arrival | Glasgow coma score \<8 that persists more than 4 hours after emergency department arrival |
| Dose/route adherence | From paramedic arrival to the scene until emergency department arrival, assessed up to 1 hour after paramedic scene arrival or 1 minute after emergency department arrival, whichever occurs last | A binary assessment of receiving midazolam in the prehospital setting by both the preferred route (intranasal or intramuscular) and correct dose \[within 30% of 0.2 mg/kg (=0.14-0.26 mg/kg)\], based on a calculation from weight measured in the emergency department |
| Life-threatening hypotension | Between paramedic midazolam administration and hospital discharge, assessed up to 24 hours | A binary assessment of whether or not the patient had a systolic blood pressure in mm Hg that persisted below the following age-based thresholds despite receiving a 20 ml/kg isotonic fluid bolus: 6-11 months (\<60 mm Hg); 1-10 years {\< \[(age in years)x2\] + 70 mm Hg}; \>10 years: (\<90 mm Hg) |
Countries
United States