Skip to content

Efficacy of CHX Cloths Versus CHX Soaps for Bathes Before Orthopedic Surgery

Skin Preparation of Patients Before Orthopedic Surgery : A Randomized Controlled Study on the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine Cloths Versus Chlorhexidine Soaps

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05120739
Acronym
POL
Enrollment
64
Registered
2021-11-15
Start date
2021-11-15
Completion date
2023-05-30
Last updated
2024-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthopedic Surgery

Keywords

chlorhexidine, cloths, orthopedic surgery, preoperative bath

Brief summary

Surgical site infections (SSI) in orthopedic surgery are rare events but associated with great morbidity as well as a significant additional cost. The World Health Organization (WHO) recently carried out meta-analyzes on all the existing prophylactic measures and could not rule on the use of chlorhexidine (CHX) cloths due to the low number of studies available. CHX cloths could actually benefit patients for whom preoperative showering is not possible, whether in emergency or trauma settings due to pain-induced functional impotence. A randomized controlled clinical study aimed at evaluating the in vivo microbiological efficacy of CHX cloths in a population of orthopedic surgery patients while evaluating the psycho-social determinants of adherence to a new preoperative preparation technique seems essential.

Interventions

DRUG2% CHX cloths

skin preparation in 2% CHX cloths

Sponsors

University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, * undergoing orthopedic surgery: programmed hip prosthesis (non-urgent), * admitted the day before the operation * and having given their written consent.

Exclusion criteria

* presence of a documented infection at the time of the intervention, * presence of skin wounds, * presence of antibiotic treatment within 15 days before the operation * intolerance to CHX,

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative decrease in the number of bacterial colonies before the antiseptic preparation of the operating site at the surgical room (T1)Between the patient's admission to the CHU GA and just before the antiseptic preparation of the operating site at the surgical room (Day 1)Relative decrease in the number of bacterial colonies measured between the patient's admission to the Grenoble Alps University Hospital (CHU GA) (T0) and after 2 preoperative skin preparations (the day before and the morning of the operation), and just before the antiseptic preparation of the operating site at the surgical room (T1) in the 2% CHX cloths group versus the 4% CHX soap group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative decrease in the number of bacterial colonies after 1 preoperative skin preparationBetween the patient's admission to the CHU GA and after 1 preoperative skin preparation (Day 0)Relative decrease in the number of bacterial colonies measured between the patient's admission to the CHU GA (T0) and after 1 preoperative skin preparation (the day before the evening of the operation)
Relative decrease in the number of bacterial colonies after 2 preoperative skin preparationsBetween the patient's admission to the CHU GA and after 2 preoperative skin preparations (Day 1)Relative decrease in the number of bacterial colonies measured between the patient's admission to the CHU GA (T0) and after 2 preoperative skin preparations (the night before and the morning of the operation)
Significant predictors of a decrease in bacterial colonizationBetween the patient's admission to the CHU GA and just before the antiseptic preparation of the operating site at the surgical room (Day 1)Significant predictors of a decrease in bacterial colonization among the sex, age of the patients, their co-morbidities, the use of cloths and the time between the last preoperative skin preparation and the skin sample in the operating room
Percentage of skin adverse reactionsBetween the patient's admission to the CHU GA and just before the antiseptic preparation of the operating site at the surgical room (Day 1)Percentage of skin adverse reactions after 2 preoperative skin preparations in the 2% CHX cloths group versus the 4% CHX soap group.
Duration of preoperative skin preparationBetween the patient's admission to the CHU GA and just before the antiseptic preparation of the operating site at the surgical room (Day 1)Duration of preoperative skin preparation in minutes in the 2% CHX cloths group versus 4% CHX soap group.
Responses to a questionnaire for patients and adherence scoreBetween surgery and discharge from the hospital (Day 4)Responses to a questionnaire for patients and adherence score in the 2% CHX cloths group versus the 4% CHX soap group.
Responses to a semi-structured interview intended for healthcare professionalsInterview at the end of the inclusion of patients (through study completion, an average of 6 months)Responses to a semi-structured interview intended for healthcare professionals who cared for patients randomized to the 2% CHX cloths group versus the 4% CHX soap group.
Nursing loadBetween the patient's admission to the CHU GA and just before the antiseptic preparation of the operating site at the surgical room (Day 1)Nursing load in the 2% CHX cloths group versus 4% CHX soap group according to the Soins Infirmiers Individualisés à la Personne Soignée (SIIPS) scale

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026