Peripheral Vein Cannulation Guided by Ultrasound
Conditions
Keywords
ultrasound, vein, cannulation
Brief summary
This study evaluates two different techniques for peripheral venous cannulation in operating theatre. Ultrasound guided insertion of peripheral cannula in comparison with conventional approach without any ultrasound guidance.
Detailed description
Peripheral venous catheter placement is one of the key tasks of an anesthesiologist, which needs to be completed before surgery in general anesthesia. The reported success rate of peripheral venous cannulation, when performed in a conventional manner, without any special technical tools which facilitate finding the peripheral vein, is only 51% during the first trial. However, up to 7% of patients require more than three cannulation trials. Ultrasound guidance of peripheral venous catheter insertion may increase success rate and shorten time to securing peripheral cannula. However, this approach has not been verified in the setting of operating theatre so far. This project aims to set the role of ultrasound guided venous cannulation in operating theatre.
Interventions
PROCEDUREPeripheral vein cannulation
The target vein is directly identified by ultrasound, the procedure of peripheral venous catheter insertion is performed conventionally, without ultrasound guidance
PROCEDURECannulation without ultrasound
Cannulation is done the conventional way without any ultrasound use.
Sponsors
Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem
Masarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s.
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Participants are divided by block randomization into two arms. Arm A peripheral vein cannulation with ultrasound guidance and Arm B conventional cannulation.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age over 18 years
Exclusion criteria
* Age \<18 years * Patient disagreement with the insertion of peripheral venous catheter * Disagreement of the patient with inclusion in a clinical trial * Contraindication of ultrasound examination of the venous system * Contraindication of the introduction of peripheral venous cannula on both upper limbs * Necessity of securing other vein access than peripheral * Contraindications of cannulation of peripheral vein
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants with Successful Securing of Peripheral Vein on First Attempt | 60 minutes | Comparing success rate of securing peripheral vein for first attempt in both methods. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Needed Attempts to Successful Securing of Peripheral | 60 minutes | Compare number of attempts that was necessary to secure peripheral vein. |
| Number of Complication After and During Securing Peripheral Vein | 24 hours | Compare complication rate after securing peripheral vein with both methods. |
| Time Needed to Secure Peripheral Vein | 60 minutes | Compare time that was need to secure peripheral vein in both methods. |
Countries
Czechia
Outcome results
None listed