Chronic Liver Disease, Cirrhosis, Portal Hypertension
Conditions
Keywords
eus-portal pressure gradient, eus-liver biopsies, liver biopsy, portal pressure gradient, hepatic venous pressure gradient, transjugular-portal pressure gradient, Transjugular-Liver biopsies
Brief summary
This study will directly compare the endoscopic ultrasound guided approach to obtain adequate liver biopsies and portal pressure gradient measurements to the current standard of care which uses the transjugular approach.
Detailed description
Current guidelines recommend that when a hepatic venous pressure gradient and a liver biopsy are needed, the liver biopsy should be done by the transjugular approach during the same session. A major limitation is that liver biopsies obtained by the transjugular approach meet quality criteria proposed by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (at least 2-3cm with at least 11 complete portal tracts) in only 40% of cases. Recent studies have shown that endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) can achieve a high rate of adequate liver biopsies using the same strict criteria described above. In addition, a novel endoscopic-ultrasound adapted manometer allows the safe and accurate measurement of portal pressure gradient (PPG) which correlates well with hepatic venous pressures (HVPG) obtained by the transjugular approach. Unfortunately to this day, no randomized controlled trials has compared the EUS-LB and PPG vs TJ-LB and HVPG directly.
Interventions
PROCEDURETransjugular hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement with liver biopsy
This procedure will be performed by an experienced interventional radiologist who will be supported by a radiology technician and nurse. Transjugular hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement will be performed using standard procedure. Following this, a transjugular liver biopsy will be obtained using an 18-gauge transjugular liver biopsy needle.
PROCEDUREEndoscopic ultrasound portal pressure gradient measurement with liver biopsy
A linear echoendoscope is inserted with the patient under conscious sedation. Using a through the scope 25-gauge needle connected to a digital manometer, portal and hepatic veins will be punctured under EUS guidance from a trans-gastric/hepatic approach. Following this, EUS-Liver biopsy is then performed immediately following EUS-PPG using a 19-gauge fine needle biopsy (FNB).
Sponsors
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
As EUS and TJ procedures are inherently different, patients and health-care workers directly involved in the procedure, including nurses, physicians, and technicians, will not be blinded. Pathologists interpreting liver biopsies will be blinded to the intervention group.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age above 18 years * Undergoing evaluation for chronic liver disease or portal hypertension * Planned to undergo a liver biopsy and HVPG by their treating hepatologist for clinical purposes * Signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR above 1.5) * Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia (Platelets under 50,000) * Anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy that cannot be discontinued * Surgically altered upper digestive anatomy * Biliary obstruction * Grade II ascites or more * Intrahepatic portal vein thrombosis * Previous liver transplantation * Past hypersensitivity reaction to midazolam or ketamine * History of psychotic disorder * Pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Compare the proportion of adequate Liver Biopsy specimens with reliable portal pressure gradient obtained by TJ or EUS | 2 weeks | Liver Biopsy (LB) specimens are defined as a biopsy of at least 25mm in length following formalin fixation and at least 11 complete portal tracts. The Portal pressure gradient (PPG) measurement is defined as two PPG values with less than 2mmHg difference. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Technical success | 1 day | Compare the proportion of HVPG and LB obtained by TJ or EUS approach |
| Liver biopsy-related outcomes | 2 weeks | Number of adequate liver biopsies obtained, total aggregate length (defined as the sum of the lengths of all specimens following fixation), number of complete portal tracts per specimen, and total number of passes needed. |
| PPG-related outcomes | 1 day | Number of PPG obtained, number of reliable PPG obtained |
| Adverse events | 30 days | Proportion of adverse events in the TJ and EUS arms following the procedure, at day 7, and day 30. |
| Satisfaction with sedation | 1 day | Compare the score obtained on the sedation satisfaction surveys as completed by the participant and the physician within the 2 arms |
Countries
Canada
Outcome results
None listed