Skip to content

A Randomized Controlled Trial of InterVapor® in France - The TARGET Trial

Targeted Segmental Vapor Ablation Treatment of Emphysema With Upper Lobe Predominance: A Randomized Controlled Trial of InterVapor® in France - The TARGET Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05118269
Enrollment
3
Registered
2021-11-11
Start date
2023-07-21
Completion date
2024-06-04
Last updated
2025-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emphysema

Keywords

Heterogeneous, Thermal Vapor, Ablation, Bronchoscopy, LVR, Lung Volume Reduction

Brief summary

This study is designed to prospectively document changes in FEV1 and health-related quality of life 12 months following sequential segmental treatment with InterVapor® in patients with heterogeneous emphysema with upper lobe predominance. For validity of the study, the results will be compared to patients that receive optimal medical therapy.

Detailed description

The primary objectives are to prospectively document changes in FEV1 and health-related quality of life 12 months following sequential segmental treatment with Bronchoscopic Thermal Vapor Ablation (BTVA) using the InterVapor system in patients with heterogeneous emphysema with upper lobe predominance. The French TARGET trial is a prospective, multi-center, single blind, randomized controlled study. 150 participants will be enrolled in the study (1:1 randomization with 75 InterVapor, 75 controls) with a 24-month follow-up period. Subjects randomized to the Control Group may be allowed to cross over to the treatment group and offered the InterVapor treatment once they have completed the protocol defined 12-month follow-up period.

Interventions

Patients will be treated with the InterVapor System in 1 to 2 segments in the upper lobes of each lung (2 to 3 segments total). Patients will also receive Optimal Medical Therapy. Guidelines for prescribing medical treatment for emphysema are published by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute/World Health Organization (NHLBI/World Health Organization , Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) workshop summary).

OTHEROptimal Medical Therapy

Patients will receive Optimal Medical Therapy. Guidelines for prescribing medical treatment for emphysema are published by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute/World Health Organization (NHLBI/WHO GOLD workshop summary).

Sponsors

Uptake Medical Technology, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between treatment group and control group. Subjects randomized to the Control Group may be allowed to cross over to the treatment group and offered the InterVapor treatment at 12 months, once they have completed the protocol defined follow-up period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \> 18 and ≤ 80 years old 2. Heterogeneous emphysema with upper lobe predominance in at least one lung segment to be treated (defined as a Heterogeneity Index (HI) ≥ 1.2 per CT) 3. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥ 15% and ≤ 45% of predicted value 4. Total lung capacity (TLC) ≥ 100% predicted 5. Post-bronchodilator Residual volume (RV) ≥ 200% predicted 6. 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) \> 100m and ≤ 450m 7. (Partial Pressure of Oxygen) PaCO2 ≤ 45 mm Hg; PaO2 \> 45 mm Hg on room air 8. Non-smoking for 4 months prior to study enrollment as confirmed by: 1. negative urine analysis or serum cotinine level of ≤ 10 ng/mL, or negative CO Hb test OR 2. If using smoking cessation product(s) containing nicotine at screening, serum cotinine level ≤ 13.7 ng/ml (or arterial carboxyhemoglobin ≤ 2.5%) 9. Optimized medical management (consistent with GOLD guidelines) 1. Pharmacological: 1.Long acting bronchodilator (LABA),Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), LAMA + LABA, or LABA + ICS \> 1 year b. Evidence of completed Pulmonary Rehabilitation 1. ≥ 6 weeks out-patient or ≥ 3 weeks in-patient within 12 months of enrollment; or, 2. Patient has or continues to participate in at home rehabilitation program (i.e. a walking program) within 6 weeks of enrollment under the supervision of a health care professional 10\. Mentally and physically able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study. Protected people as defined by the Code de la Sante Publique cannot be included in the study

Exclusion criteria

1. DLCO \< 20% predicted 2. Uncontrolled pulmonary hypertension (systolic pulmonary arterial pressure \>45 mm Hg) or evidence or history of cor pulmonale as determined by recent echocardiogram 3. Clinically significant bronchiectasis 4. Clinically significant (greater than 4 tablespoons per day) sputum production. 5. Two (2) or more COPD exacerbations or pneumonia episodes requiring hospitalization in the last year 6. Evidence of active infection in the lungs at the time of procedure. 7. Daily use of systemic steroids, \> 10 mg prednisolone (or equivalent) daily. 8. Lung pathology of nodule not proven stable or benign 9. Clinically significant pulmonary fibrosis 10. Prior lung transplant, lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), bullectomy, or lobectomy 11. Prior lung volume reduction via endobronchial valves(s), coil(s), and/or polymer. Note: Patients whose endobronchial valves have been removed can be treated if: all valves removed ≥ 3 months prior to InterVapor and baseline bronchoscopy reveals no airway obstruction or obvious tissue granulation 12. Large bulla (defined as \> 1/3 volume of the lobe) 13. Highly diseased upper and lower lobes in contralateral lung (%-950 HU density \>50%) 14. Paraseptal emphysema in any segment targeted for treatment 15. Myocardial Infarction or congestive heart failure within 6 months of screening. 16. Diagnosis of heart failure with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) \< 45% as determined by recent echocardiogram (completed within 3 months prior to screening). 17. Unable to safely discontinue anti-coagulants or platelet inhibitors for 6 weeks post procedure. 18. Body mass index (BMI) \> 32 kg/m2 19. Patient taking immunosuppressive drugs for the treatment of cancer, rheumatic arthritis, autoimmune disease, or prevention of tissue or organ rejection. 20. Subject is pregnant or lactating, or plan to become pregnant within the study timeframe 21. Any disease or condition that is likely to limit survival to less than one year 22. Concomitant illnesses or medications that may pose a significant increased risk for complications following treatment with InterVapor® 23. Currently enrolled in another clinical trial studying an experimental treatment. 24. Any condition that would interfere with completion of the study including study assessments and study procedure including bronchoscopy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in FEV1 between Treatment vs Control at 12 months12 monthsPercentage change in Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) compared to active comparator: Change in FEV1, percent change from baseline to 12 months in FEV1, where FEV1 is expressed in raw units of volume (mL).
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (SGRQ-C) changes between Treatment vs Control at 12 months12 monthsHealth-related Qualify of Life (SGRQ-C) compared to active comparator. This is calculated as change from baseline to 12 months in SGRQ-C Total Score. SGRQ-C scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score means a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in other measures of pulmonary function- Forced Expiratory Volume, absolute change- at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsChange in FEV1, abs: Absolute change from baseline to follow-up in FEV1, where FEV1 is expressed in raw units of volume (mL).
Improvement in other measures of pulmonary function- Forced Expiratory Volume, Percent change- at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsChange in FEV1, Percent Predicted value: Percent change from baseline to follow-up in FEV1, where FEV1 is expressed in percent predicted computed by European Respiratory Standard (ERS) standards.
Improvement in other measures of pulmonary function- Forced Expiratory Volume, Abs, PP change- at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsChange in FEV1, abs, PP: absolute change from baseline to follow-up in FEV1, where FEV1 is expressed in percent predicted computed by ERS standards.
Improvement in other measures of pulmonary function- Forced Vital Capacity(FVC) change- at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsChange in FVC: percent change from baseline to follow-up in Forced Vital Capacity, expressed in raw units of volume(mL)
Improvement in other measures of pulmonary function- Forced Vital Capacity Percent Predicted change- at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsChange in FVC PP: percent change from baseline to follow-up in Forced Vital Capacity, expressed in percent predicted computed by ERS standards
Improvement in other measures of pulmonary function- Residual Volume- at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsPercent change from baseline to follow-up in Residual Volume
Improvement in other measures of pulmonary function- Residual Volume-Abs at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsPercent change from baseline to follow-up in Residual Volume, where RV is expressed in raw units of volume (mL).
Improvement in other measures of pulmonary function- Residual Volume-Percent Predicted value at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsPercent change from baseline to follow-up in Residual Volume, where RV is expressed in percent predicted computed by ERS standards.
Number of serious adverse events and fatal events12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsNumber of serious adverse events (SAEs) and fatal events
Improvement in other measures of pulmonary function-Diffusing Capacity of Lung (DLCO)- Percent Predicted Value at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsPercent change from baseline to follow-up in Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide, where DLCO is expressed in percent predicted computed by ERS standards.
Improvement in other measures of pulmonary function-Diffusing Capacity of Lung (DLCO)- Absolute Percent Predicted Value at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide, where DLCO is expressed in percent predicted computed by ERS standards.
Changes in segmental lung volumes from as assessed by CT at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsChanges in segmental lung volumes from baseline to 12 months as assessed by CT
Changes in pulmonary function tests as assessed by body plethysmography measures at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsChanges in pulmonary function tests as assessed by body plethysmography measures at 12 months
Binary responder analysis to determine minimally clinical important difference for SGRQ-C at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsBinary responder analysis to determine Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the following: • SGRQ (\> 8 points) in Treatment vs Control at 12 months
Binary responder analysis to determine minimally clinical important difference for 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsBinary responder analysis to determine Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the following: • 6MWD (\> 26m) in Treatment vs Control at 12 months
Binary responder analysis to determine minimally clinical important difference for COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsBinary responder analysis to determine Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the following: • CAT Score (\> 2 points) in Treatment vs Control at 12 months
Binary responder analysis to determine minimally clinical important difference for Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ) score at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsBinary responder analysis to determine Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the following: • SOBQ Score (\> 5 points) in Treatment vs Control at 12 month
Improvement in other measures of pulmonary function- Residual Volume-Abs Percent Predicted value at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in Residual Volume, where RV is expressed in percent predicted computed by ERS standards
Binary responder analysis to determine minimally clinical important difference for FEV1 at 12, 18 and 24 months12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsBinary responder analysis to determine Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the following: • FEV1 (\> 12% predicted) in Treatment vs Control at 12 months

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026