Alcohol Use Disorder, Depression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Panic Disorder, Social Anxiety Disorder
Conditions
Brief summary
This project is designed to determine if a computer-delivered cognitive-behavioral treatment can improve the otherwise poor alcohol use disorder treatment outcomes for individuals with a co-occurring anxiety disorder. In the past, the investigators showed that this treatment does improve outcomes for these individuals when delivered by a therapist. If the present work shows that the computer-delivered version is also effective, it would provide an inexpensive program with virtually unlimited scalability to enable access to the treatment by many more individuals than is currently the case.
Detailed description
The broad goal of the proposed work is to conduct a randomized controlled trial of a specialized computer-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to supplement standard alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment in patients with a co-occurring anxiety disorder (comorbidity). Comorbidity is both common in AUD treatment patients (up to 50%) and confers a substantial increase in the risk of a return to drinking in the months following treatment. Because research shows that simply adding a standard psychiatric treatment does not substantially improve the AUD outcomes of comorbid individuals, the investigators developed a CBT-based intervention aimed at disrupting the positive-feedback loop (vicious cycle; VC) of mutually aggravating negative affect and drinking behavior/urges (the VC-CBT). In an Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), AUD treatment patients who received the therapist-delivered VC-CBT demonstrated significantly improved alcohol use outcomes as compared to those who received a standard anxiety treatment. Unfortunately, most community-based AUD treatment programs do not have clinical staff with the specialized training and technical expertise needed to deliver the VC-CBT. To help bridge this research-to-practice gap, the investigators went on to develop a fully autonomous and interactive computer-delivered version of the VC-CBT and have demonstrated its functionality in AUD patients. Now, the investigators propose to test the clinical efficacy of the computer-delivered VC-CBT, as well as the mechanisms and processes by which it is hypothesized to work. Aim I is a randomized controlled trial comparing the computer-delivered VC-CBT to an intensity-matched computer-delivered active control intervention that focuses on healthy lifestyles. 256 individuals in residential AUD treatment who have a comorbid anxiety disorder will receive either the VC-CBT or the active control intervention to obtain 200 cases that complete a 1-, 4- and 8-month follow-up. The investigators predict the VC-CBT group will demonstrate superior alcohol-related outcomes at follow-up relative to the control group. Aim II evaluates the extent to which the computer-delivered VC-CBT selectively imparts the skills targeted and whether they convey (mediate) the interventions therapeutic effect. This entails a formal series of causal steps analyses of the associations of: treatment-\>skills; skills-\>outcomes; and, treatment -\> outcomes, with vs. without the effect of skills-\>outcomes statistically controlled. Aim III will test the theoretically-derived prediction that the computer-delivered VC-CBT moderates (i.e., weakens) the association of near real-time negative affect and negative situations with drinking behavior and drinking urges. This will be accomplished by analyzing a series of electronic Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) recordings completed in participants' natural environment in each of the 30 days following the conclusion of treatment. The impact of this work would be to provide a scalable and inexpensive means of improving the otherwise poor AUD treatment outcomes of comorbid AUD treatment patients. The work will also provide new scientific knowledge about the mechanisms and processes of change stemming from comorbidity treatment.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALNegative Emotions and Addiction Tools Program (NEAT)- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
The program provides simplified clinical, learning and neuroscience-based education about the vicious cycle in which negative affect serves to motivate drinking, which, in turn, worsens negative affect. Participants also learn how each of three skills (breathing control, cognitive restructuring, problem solving) was designed to disrupt a specific element of the vicious cycle that includes physiological, psychological and behavioral processes.
PMRT is a standard stress management coping skill that entails tensing and releasing specified muscle groups to obtain deep muscle relaxation.
Sponsors
University of Minnesota
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Outcome assessors will not know which study group participants have been assigned to.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* current (past 30 days) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) diagnosis of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PD/Ag), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) or social anxiety disorder (SAD) * receiving treatment primarily for alcohol (vs. drug) dependence * ability to provide informed consent * a minimum of an eighth grade English reading level * status as a residential patient in the Lodging Plus (LP) addiction treatment program * sufficient time left in their residential LP care to complete the study protocol through the post-treatment assessment
Exclusion criteria
* cognitive or medical impairments that prohibit study participation as determined by study PI * serious suicide risk determined by study PI * court-ordered treatment. (The exclusion is based on its classification as a vulnerable population.) * Self-reported past participation in a Kushner intervention study while in Lodging Plus
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent heavy (binge) days drinking | eight-months following treatment (four-month assessment is primary) | a ratio expressed as a percent of the days the individual drank 5 (for men) or 4 (for women) or more drinks to the total number of days over the follow-up period in which drinking was possible. |
| Days to first use | eight-months following treatment (four-month assessment is primary) | Determined for the entirety of the post treatment time for which the investigators have data up to the 8-month assessment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Any use of alcohol | eight-months following treatment (four-month assessment is primary) | Any use of alcohol will be binary (yes/no) indicator of whether any alcohol was consumed. |
| Percent days drinking | eight-months following treatment (four-month assessment is primary) | a ratio of the days that alcohol was consumed to the total number of possible drinking days. |
| Days to first binge | eight-months following treatment (four-month assessment is primary) | Determined for the entirety of the post treatment time for which the investigators have data up to the 8-month assessment. |
| Days to first 3 consecutive days of drinking | eight-months following treatment (four-month assessment is primary) | Determined for the entirety of the post treatment time for which the investigators have data up to the 8-month assessment. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Primary ContactLilly Hartnett
Outcome results
None listed