Skip to content

Randomized Double-Blind Phase 2 Efficacy and Safety of Autologous HB-MSCs vs Placebo for Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Center, Phase 2, Efficacy and Safety Study of Autologous HB-adMSCs vs Placebo for the Treatment of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05116540
Acronym
HBMS01
Enrollment
24
Registered
2021-11-11
Start date
2021-11-24
Completion date
2024-06-04
Last updated
2025-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Mesenchymal Stem Cells, MS, RRMS, stem cells, MSCs, Relapsing, Remitting

Brief summary

Randomized Double-Blind Efficacy and safety study of Autologous HB-adMSCs versus placebo for the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. This study will be for 24 subjects with 6 infusions over a 52 week period. Study participants will continue their established concomitant medications during participation in this investigation.

Detailed description

Each eligible study subject will receive a total of 6 intravenous infusions of HB-adMSCs or placebo. Study infusions will be administered with the following regimen, Week 0, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 32. There will be one follow-up visit and end of study at week 52.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALHB-adMSCs

Autologous product

DRUGPlacebo

Normal Saline

Sponsors

Hope Biosciences Research Foundation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-Blinded Randomized Study

Intervention model description

Randomized, Double-Blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female participants 18 - 75 years of age. 2. Study participants must have been diagnosed with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) for at least 6 months before study participation. 3. Study participants must be stabilized on any MS therapy for at least 6 months prior to randomization. 4. Study participants must agree not to increase or begin any Diseases Modifying Therapies for MS during participation in the clinical trial. 5. Study participants must have an EDSS score between 3.0 to 6.5. (Patient must be able to walk). 6. Study participants must have previously banked their mesenchymal stem cells with Hope Biosciences. 7. Study participants should be able to read, understand, and provide written consent. 8. Before any clinical-trial-related procedures are performed, informed consent must be obtained from the participants voluntarily. 9. Female study participants should not be pregnant or plan to become pregnant during study participation and for 6 months after last investigational product administration. \* 10. Male participants, if their sexual partners can become pregnant, should use a method of contraception during study participation and for 6 months after the last administration of the investigated product. \* 11. Study participant is able and willing to comply with the requirements of this clinical trial. 12. Participants in the study should have evidence of disease, as shown by MRIs of the brain or spinal cord, with the most recent being within 1 year of the screening date, and no other signs of relapse.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy, lactation. Women of childbearing age who are not pregnant but do not take effective contraceptive measures. \* 2. Study participants with other types of multiple sclerosis, such as progressive relapsing, primary or secondary progressive. 3. Study participant has any active malignancy, including but not limited to evidence of cutaneous basal, squamous cell carcinoma, or melanoma. 4. Study participant has known addiction or dependency or has current substance use or abuse. 5. Study participant has 1 or more significant concurrent medical conditions (verified by medical records), including the following: * Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (PCDM) defined as history of deficient standard of care treatment and/or pre-prandial glucose \>130mg/dl during screening visit or post-prandial glucose \>200mg/dl. * Medical History of Chronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnosis and/or screening results of eGFR \< 59mL/min/1.73m2. * Presence of New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III/IV heart failure during screening visit. * Any medical history of myocardial infarction in any of the different types, such as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), coronary spasm, or unstable angina. * Medical history of uncontrolled high blood pressure defined as a deficient standard of care treatment and/or blood pressure \> 180/120 mm/Hg during screening visit.Medical history of diseases such as, inherited thrombophilias, cancer of the lung, brain, lymphatic, gynecologic system (ovary or uterus), or gastrointestinal tract (like pancreas or stomach). * Medical history of conditions, such as recent major general surgery, (within 12 months before the Screening), lower extremity paralysis due to spinal cord injury, fracture of the pelvis, hips, or femur. 6. Study participant has received any stem cell treatment within 12 months before first dose of investigational product other than stem cells produced by Hope Biosciences. 7. The study participant has received any experimental drug within 12 months before the first dose of the investigational product. (Except for COVID-19 vaccinations) 8. Study participant has a laboratory abnormality during screening, including the following: * White blood cell count \< 3000/mm3 * Platelet count \< 80,000mm3 * Absolute neutrophil count \< 1500/mm3 * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 10 upper limit of normal (ULN) x 1.5 9. Study participant has any other laboratory abnormality or medical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator poses a safety risk or will prevent the subject from completing the study. 10. The study participant has any concurrent neurologic disease, including hereditary conditions that the principal investigator considers could interfere with the study participation. Some of these neurologic diseases could be Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) or Spinocerebellar Ataxia (SCA). 11. Study participant has any ongoing infection, including TB, CMV, EBV, HSV, VZV, hepatitis virus, toxoplasmosis, HIV, or syphilis infections, as well as hepatitis B surface antigen positive, and or/ hepatitis C PCR positivity. 12. Study participant is unlikely to complete the study or adhere to the study procedures. 13. Study participant has a previously diagnosed psychiatric condition which in the opinion of the investigator may affect self-assessments. 14. Study participants with any systemic infection requiring treatment with antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 30 days prior to first dose of the investigational product. 15. Male study participants who plan to donate sperm during the study or within 6 months after the last dose. Female patients who plan to donate eggs or undergo in vitro fertilization treatment during the study or within 6 months after the last dose. 16. Study participants who are determined by the Investigator to be unsuitable for study enrollment for other reasons. 17. Participants' life expectancy must not have been considerably limited by other comorbidities, a history of previous myelodysplasia, or hematologic illness. * Acceptable reversible and permanent methods of birth control include: 1\. True sexual abstinence (abstaining from sexual activity during the entire period of risk). 2\. Surgery (occlusion bilateral tubal ligation, vasectomized partner). 3. Hormonal contraceptives associated with ovulation inhibition (oral, injectable, implantable patch, or intravaginal). 4. Intrauterine device (IUD), or intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Physical Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 InstrumentBaseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. The developers used the SF-36 as a base and added 18 questions to address MS-specific problems, including fatigue and cognitive function. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function. There is no single overall score for MSQOL-54. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted combination of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life).
Change From Baseline in Mental Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. The developers used the SF-36 as a base and added 18 questions to address MS-specific problems, including fatigue and cognitive function. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function. There is no single overall score for MSQOL-54. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted combination of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life).
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Cognitive Function subscale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 15% of the total Mental Health Composite Score.
Change From Baseline in Emotional Well-Being Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Emotional Wellbeing sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 29% of the total Mental Health Composite Score.
Change From Baseline in Health Distress Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Health Distress sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 14% of the total Mental Health Composite Score and 11% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.
Change From Baseline in RL/Emotional Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Role Limitation/Emotional sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 24% of the total Mental Health Composite Score.
Change From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Overall Quality of Life sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 18% of the total Mental Health Composite Score.
Change From Baseline in Energy/Fatigue Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Energy/Fatigue sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 12% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.
Change From Baseline in Health Perception Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Health Perception sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 17% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.
Change From Baseline in Physical Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Physical Function sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 17% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.
Change From Baseline in RL/Physical Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Role Limitations - Physical sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 12% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.
Change From Baseline in Pain Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Pain subscale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 11% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.
Change From Baseline in Social Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Social Function subscale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 12% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.
Change From Baseline in Sexual Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Baseline to Week 52The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Sexual Function subscale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 8% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.
Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Physical Health Composite Score Change From Baseline Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54Baseline to Week 52Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a statistical model that combines linear regression and ANOVA to analyze the results of different treatments. In this outcome measure, ANCOVA was used to analyze change in the physical health composite score in treatment versus placebo. The ANCOVA model was used to compare HB-adMSC patients with placebo patients on Change from Baseline to Week 52 with a fixed factor of treatment, fixed stratification factors of MS severity, age and gender, and a covariate of the baseline value for the score on the corresponding outcome measure. This model allows us to test the significance of the effects of the treatment at Week 52. Total score for this subscale is 100, so the range of scores for the ANCOVA model (showing average change in scores) would be -100 to 100 (theoretically). Higher scores show better outcomes--in this model, a positive score would indicate improvement and a negative score indicates worsening. Subscales are interpreted separately.
Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Mental Health Composite Score Change From Baseline Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54 Composite ScoreBaseline to Week 52Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a statistical model that combines linear regression and ANOVA to analyze the results of different treatments. In this outcome measure, ANCOVA was used to analyze change in the mental health composite score in treatment versus placebo. The ANCOVA model was used to compare HB-adMSC patients with placebo patients on Change from Baseline to Week 52 with a fixed factor of treatment, fixed stratification factors of MS severity, age and gender, and a covariate of the baseline value for the score on the corresponding outcome measure. This model allows us to test the significance of the effects of the treatment at Week 52. Total score for this subscale is 100, so the range of scores for the ANCOVA model (showing average change in scores) would be -100 to 100 (theoretically). Higher scores show better outcomes--in this model, a positive score would indicate improvement and a negative score indicates worsening. Subscales are interpreted separately.
Bayesian Statistical Analysis - Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Physical Health Composite Score Change From Baseline Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54Baseline to Week 52Bayesian analysis is a statistical method that uses probability distributions to make statistical inferences about parameters using prior information. In this outcome measure, Bayesian analysis was used to analyze change in the physical health composite score in treatment versus placebo. In this study, Bayesian analysis was used to estimate the posterior distribution and to estimate the probability of the true treatment difference of change from baseline to Week 52. A linear model for each visit was constructed to model within-subject observation covariance structures by multivariate normal (MVN) distribution in the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure. Total score for this subscale is 100, so the range of scores for the ANCOVA model (showing average change in scores) would be -100 to 100 (theoretically). Higher scores show better outcomes--in this model, a positive score would indicate improvement and a negative score indicates worsening. Subscales are interpreted separately.
Bayesian Statistical Analysis - Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Mental Health Composite Score Change From Baseline - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54Baseline to Week 52Bayesian analysis is a statistical method that uses probability distributions to make statistical inferences about parameters using prior information. In this outcome measure, Bayesian analysis was used to analyze change in the mental health composite score in treatment versus placebo. In this study, Bayesian analysis was used to estimate the posterior distribution and to estimate the probability of the true treatment difference of change from baseline to Week 52. A linear model for each visit was constructed to model within-subject observation covariance structures by multivariate normal (MVN) distribution in the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure. Total score for this subscale is 100, so the range of scores for the ANCOVA model (showing average change in scores) would be -100 to 100 (theoretically). Higher scores show better outcomes--in this model, a positive score would indicate improvement and a negative score indicates worsening. Subscales are interpreted separately.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Laboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Baseline to Week 52Unit (x10\^3 cells/uL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Laboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of % of white blood cell count.
Laboratory Values - CBC (% of Total Blood Cell Count)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of % of total blood cell count.
Laboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of g/dL
Laboratory Values - CBC (pg)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of pg
Laboratory Values - CBC (fL)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of fL.
Laboratory Values - CBC (x10^6 Cells/uL)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of x10\^6 cells/uL.
Laboratory Values - CBC (RDW)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of % (RDW - Red Cell Distribution Width)
Laboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with unit of g/dL.
Laboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Albumin (g/dL) to Calc. Globulin (g/dL))Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with units of Ratio: Albumin(g/dL) to Calc. Globulin(g/dL)
Laboratory Values - CMP (U/L)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with units of U/L.
Laboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with units of mg/dL.
Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Total Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Scores Through Week 52 - Change From Baseline - Efficacy Analysis SetBaseline to Week 52The EDSS is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time. This scale ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5-unit increments and a higher score represents increased disability. Scoring is based on an examination by a neurologist.
Laboratory Values - CMP (mL/Min/1.73m^2)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with units of mL/min/1.73m\^2.
Laboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) to Creatinine (mg/dL))Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with units of Ratio: Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) to Creatinine (mg/dL).
Laboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in Coagulation Panel values with units of seconds.
Laboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with units of mEq/L.
Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Change From Baseline Barthel Index Scores Through Week 52 - Efficacy Analysis SetBaseline to Week 52The Barthel index is an ordinal scale that evaluates functional independence in the domains of personal care and mobility. A total of ten variables describing activities of daily living and mobility are considered, with a higher number reflecting better capacity to operate independently. The Barthel Index assesses the level of help needed by a person on a set of ten activities of daily living (ADL) related to mobility and self-care. Score ranges from 0 points to 20 points, with lower scores indicating increased disability.
ANCOVA Model - Change From Baseline 9-Hole Peg Test Scores - Dominant Hand Avg Time Through Week 52Baseline to Week 52The 9-HPT is a short, standardized upper extremity exam. It measures the time taken to complete the test activity, recorded in seconds. The higher the score the worse the disability.
Laboratory Values. Coagulation Panel (Ratio: Prothrombin Time (Seconds) / Mean Normal Prothrombin Time (Seconds))Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)Changes from baseline in Coagulation laboratory values with units of Ratio: Prothrombin time (seconds) / Mean normal prothrombin time (seconds).
Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Change From Baseline 9-Hole Peg Test Scores - Non-Dominant Hand Avg Time Through Week 52Baseline to Week 52The 9-HPT is a short, standardized upper extremity exam. It measures the time taken to complete the test activity, recorded in seconds. The higher the score the worse the disability.
Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Test ScoresBaseline to Week 52The PHQ-9 is the most used depression and suicidal thoughts screening test used to monitor the severity of depression and response to treatment. Depression Severity: 0-4 none, 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, 20-27 severe.
Baseline Vitals Values - HeightBaselineBaseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set
Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTBaseline to Week 52Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment
Autologous Hope Biosciences adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells. HB-adMSCs: HB-adMSCs will be administered intravenously to study participants who qualify. Placebo: Placebo will be administered intravenously to study participants who qualify.
12
Placebo
Sterile Saline Solution 0.9% HB-adMSCs: HB-adMSCs will be administered intravenously to study participants who qualify. Placebo: Placebo will be administered intravenously to study participants who qualify.
12
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatmentPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants10 Participants21 Participants
Age, Continuous51.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.57
49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.17
50.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.19
Age, Customized51.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.57
49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.17
50.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.19
Baseline BMI24.72 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.52
27.17 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.723
25.94 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.639
Baseline Weight68.61 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.493
76.55 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.619
72.58 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.172
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants9 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 1211 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 121 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Mental Health Composite Score Change From Baseline Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54 Composite Score

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a statistical model that combines linear regression and ANOVA to analyze the results of different treatments. In this outcome measure, ANCOVA was used to analyze change in the mental health composite score in treatment versus placebo. The ANCOVA model was used to compare HB-adMSC patients with placebo patients on Change from Baseline to Week 52 with a fixed factor of treatment, fixed stratification factors of MS severity, age and gender, and a covariate of the baseline value for the score on the corresponding outcome measure. This model allows us to test the significance of the effects of the treatment at Week 52. Total score for this subscale is 100, so the range of scores for the ANCOVA model (showing average change in scores) would be -100 to 100 (theoretically). Higher scores show better outcomes--in this model, a positive score would indicate improvement and a negative score indicates worsening. Subscales are interpreted separately.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentAnalysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Mental Health Composite Score Change From Baseline Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54 Composite Score13.362 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Error 3.961
PlaceboAnalysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Mental Health Composite Score Change From Baseline Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54 Composite Score-2.402 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Error 4.161
p-value: 0.016695% CI: [3.307, 28.221]ANCOVA
Primary

Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Physical Health Composite Score Change From Baseline Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a statistical model that combines linear regression and ANOVA to analyze the results of different treatments. In this outcome measure, ANCOVA was used to analyze change in the physical health composite score in treatment versus placebo. The ANCOVA model was used to compare HB-adMSC patients with placebo patients on Change from Baseline to Week 52 with a fixed factor of treatment, fixed stratification factors of MS severity, age and gender, and a covariate of the baseline value for the score on the corresponding outcome measure. This model allows us to test the significance of the effects of the treatment at Week 52. Total score for this subscale is 100, so the range of scores for the ANCOVA model (showing average change in scores) would be -100 to 100 (theoretically). Higher scores show better outcomes--in this model, a positive score would indicate improvement and a negative score indicates worsening. Subscales are interpreted separately.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentAnalysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Physical Health Composite Score Change From Baseline Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-5419.872 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Error 2.979
PlaceboAnalysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Physical Health Composite Score Change From Baseline Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54-2.248 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Error 3.145
p-value: 0.000295% CI: [12.282, 31.959]ANCOVA
Primary

Bayesian Statistical Analysis - Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Mental Health Composite Score Change From Baseline - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54

Bayesian analysis is a statistical method that uses probability distributions to make statistical inferences about parameters using prior information. In this outcome measure, Bayesian analysis was used to analyze change in the mental health composite score in treatment versus placebo. In this study, Bayesian analysis was used to estimate the posterior distribution and to estimate the probability of the true treatment difference of change from baseline to Week 52. A linear model for each visit was constructed to model within-subject observation covariance structures by multivariate normal (MVN) distribution in the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure. Total score for this subscale is 100, so the range of scores for the ANCOVA model (showing average change in scores) would be -100 to 100 (theoretically). Higher scores show better outcomes--in this model, a positive score would indicate improvement and a negative score indicates worsening. Subscales are interpreted separately.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentBayesian Statistical Analysis - Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Mental Health Composite Score Change From Baseline - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-5412.414 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 7.457
PlaceboBayesian Statistical Analysis - Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Mental Health Composite Score Change From Baseline - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54-3.333 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 7.544
p-value: 0.829295% CI: [3.329, 28.177]ANCOVA
Primary

Bayesian Statistical Analysis - Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Physical Health Composite Score Change From Baseline Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54

Bayesian analysis is a statistical method that uses probability distributions to make statistical inferences about parameters using prior information. In this outcome measure, Bayesian analysis was used to analyze change in the physical health composite score in treatment versus placebo. In this study, Bayesian analysis was used to estimate the posterior distribution and to estimate the probability of the true treatment difference of change from baseline to Week 52. A linear model for each visit was constructed to model within-subject observation covariance structures by multivariate normal (MVN) distribution in the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure. Total score for this subscale is 100, so the range of scores for the ANCOVA model (showing average change in scores) would be -100 to 100 (theoretically). Higher scores show better outcomes--in this model, a positive score would indicate improvement and a negative score indicates worsening. Subscales are interpreted separately.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentBayesian Statistical Analysis - Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Physical Health Composite Score Change From Baseline Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-5418.373 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 5.426
PlaceboBayesian Statistical Analysis - Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Physical Health Composite Score Change From Baseline Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54-3.764 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 5.308
p-value: 0.990595% CI: [12.361, 32.006]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Cognitive Function subscale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 15% of the total Mental Health Composite Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)10.45 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 23.29
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)3.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 20.84
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)5.91 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 10.91
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)9.55 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 18.09
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)59.55 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 39.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)-2.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 10.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)64.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 36.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)6.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 16.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)5.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 14.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)4.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 17.55
Primary

Change From Baseline in Emotional Well-Being Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Emotional Wellbeing sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 29% of the total Mental Health Composite Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Emotional Well-Being Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)6.91 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 14.32
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Emotional Well-Being Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)4.80 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 21.81
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Emotional Well-Being Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)6.55 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 10.47
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Emotional Well-Being Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)12.36 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 17.66
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Emotional Well-Being Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)71.27 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 21.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Emotional Well-Being Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)-1.20 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 11.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Emotional Well-Being Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)68.40 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 17.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Emotional Well-Being Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)3.60 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 11.54
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Emotional Well-Being Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)3.20 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 13.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Emotional Well-Being Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)2.40 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 12.82
Primary

Change From Baseline in Energy/Fatigue Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Energy/Fatigue sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 12% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Energy/Fatigue Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)6.18 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 13.67
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Energy/Fatigue Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)2.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 21.44
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Energy/Fatigue Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)4.36 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 17.75
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Energy/Fatigue Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)15.27 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 20.62
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Energy/Fatigue Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)48.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 15.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Energy/Fatigue Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)1.60 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 9.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Energy/Fatigue Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)32.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 21.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Energy/Fatigue Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)13.60 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 14.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Energy/Fatigue Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)10.40 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 14.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Energy/Fatigue Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)2.40 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 17.4
Primary

Change From Baseline in Health Distress Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Health Distress sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 14% of the total Mental Health Composite Score and 11% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Health Distress Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)19.55 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 25.44
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Health Distress Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)5.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 40.03
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Health Distress Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)13.18 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 25.33
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Health Distress Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)25.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 28.55
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Health Distress Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)54.09 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 24.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Distress Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)-2.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 13.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Distress Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)36.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 28.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Distress Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)16.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 22.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Distress Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)4.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 19.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Distress Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)2.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 19.18
Primary

Change From Baseline in Health Perception Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Health Perception sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 17% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Health Perception Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)9.09 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 18.68
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Health Perception Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)10.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 15.09
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Health Perception Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)0.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 17.03
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Health Perception Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)12.27 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 19.41
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Health Perception Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)59.55 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 18.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Perception Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)-2.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 12.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Perception Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)42.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 21.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Perception Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)5.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 9.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Perception Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)3.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 15.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Perception Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)-1.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 12.48
Primary

Change From Baseline in Mental Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. The developers used the SF-36 as a base and added 18 questions to address MS-specific problems, including fatigue and cognitive function. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function. There is no single overall score for MSQOL-54. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted combination of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Mental Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)11.04 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 10.96
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Mental Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)5.48 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 17.96
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Mental Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)8.81 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 11.2
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Mental Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)13.54 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 15.65
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Mental Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)65.37 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 24.83
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mental Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)-2.59 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 22.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mental Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)60.88 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 20.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mental Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)6.39 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 21.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mental Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)3.22 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 13.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mental Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)-0.35 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 22.4
Primary

Change From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Overall Quality of Life sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 18% of the total Mental Health Composite Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)6.05 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 13.93
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)-1.83 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 14.54
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)3.04 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 14.2
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)3.64 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 10.14
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)71.82 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 15.92
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)4.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 9.85
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)48.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 12.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)7.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 12.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)4.67 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 12.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Overall Quality of Life Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)1.84 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 12.52
Primary

Change From Baseline in Pain Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Pain subscale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 11% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Pain Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)7.12 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 15.19
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Pain Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)-1.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 32.12
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Pain Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)4.55 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 26.28
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Pain Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)13.49 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 18.17
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Pain Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)71.82 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 14.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pain Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)1.33 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 17.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pain Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)59.83 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 27.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pain Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)7.17 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 17.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pain Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)4.34 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 16.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pain Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)0.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 14.66
Primary

Change From Baseline in Physical Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Physical Function sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 17% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Physical Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)1.36 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 24.2
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Physical Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)7.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 13.99
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Physical Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)12.27 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 10.09
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Physical Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)7.73 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 15.06
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Physical Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)36.36 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 25.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)7.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 25.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)43.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 17.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)-1.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 15.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)-6.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 19.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)-0.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 19.78
Primary

Change From Baseline in Physical Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. The developers used the SF-36 as a base and added 18 questions to address MS-specific problems, including fatigue and cognitive function. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function. There is no single overall score for MSQOL-54. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted combination of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Physical Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 InstrumentInfusion 3 (Week 8)8.21 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 13.08
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Physical Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 InstrumentFollow-Up (Week 42)4.19 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 18.03
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Physical Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 InstrumentInfusion 5 (Week 24)6.68 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 7.33
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Physical Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 InstrumentEnd of Study (Week 52)15.98 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 12.08
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Physical Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 InstrumentInfusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)53.85 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 9.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 InstrumentEnd of Study (Week 52)2.03 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 10.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 InstrumentInfusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)44.07 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 10.95
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 InstrumentInfusion 3 (Week 8)7.03 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 10.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 InstrumentInfusion 5 (Week 24)3.43 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Health Composite Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 InstrumentFollow-Up (Week 42)0.06 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 11.13
Primary

Change From Baseline in RL/Emotional Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Role Limitation/Emotional sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 24% of the total Mental Health Composite Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in RL/Emotional Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)63.64 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 43.35
TreatmentChange From Baseline in RL/Emotional Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)15.15 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 27.34
TreatmentChange From Baseline in RL/Emotional Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)15.15 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 27.34
TreatmentChange From Baseline in RL/Emotional Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)13.33 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 28.11
TreatmentChange From Baseline in RL/Emotional Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)18.18 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 31.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RL/Emotional Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)-10.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 80.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RL/Emotional Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)-10.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 66.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RL/Emotional Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)3.33 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 65.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RL/Emotional Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)73.33 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 43.89
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RL/Emotional Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)0.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 41.57
Primary

Change From Baseline in RL/Physical Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Role Limitations - Physical sub-scale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 12% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in RL/Physical Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)11.36 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 42.37
TreatmentChange From Baseline in RL/Physical Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)-2.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 49.23
TreatmentChange From Baseline in RL/Physical Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)6.82 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 38.88
TreatmentChange From Baseline in RL/Physical Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)34.09 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 45.1
TreatmentChange From Baseline in RL/Physical Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)38.64 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 40.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RL/Physical Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)10.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 50.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RL/Physical Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)20.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 32.91
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RL/Physical Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)22.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 38.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RL/Physical Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)17.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 35.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RL/Physical Problems Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)5.00 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 15.81
Primary

Change From Baseline in Sexual Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Sexual Function subscale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 8% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Sexual Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)8.33 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 25.27
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Sexual Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)6.66 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 33.52
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Sexual Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)8.34 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 26.09
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Sexual Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)9.85 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 19.65
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Sexual Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)65.15 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 30.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sexual Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)-4.16 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 15.84
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sexual Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)71.67 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 24.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sexual Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)-2.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 20.44
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sexual Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)-3.33 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 20.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sexual Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)-3.33 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 14.28
Primary

Change From Baseline in Social Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.

The MSQOL-54 is a comprehensive health-related quality of life measure incorporating general and MS-specific questions into a single instrument. This 54-item questionnaire provides 12 sub-scales, two summary scores, and two extra single-item measures. The sub-scales are physical function, role limits-physical, emotional role restrictions, pain, emotional well-being, energy, health perceptions, social position, cognitive function, health distress, overall quality of life, and sexual function, and each one is scored from 0 to 100. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted summation of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). This outcome measure shows the change from baseline of the Social Function subscale. The score ranges from 0 to 100 percent, and is 12% of the total Physical Health Composite Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their follow-up visit (Week 42) and therefore was unable to complete the MSQOL-54 for that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Social Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)6.06 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 25.02
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Social Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)2.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 23.26
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Social Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)5.30 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 13.58
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Social Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)13.64 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 25.35
TreatmentChange From Baseline in Social Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)67.42 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 23.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Social Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.End of Study (Week 52)1.67 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 15.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Social Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 1/Baseline (Week 0)59.17 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 14.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Social Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 3 (Week 8)-2.50 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 11.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Social Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Infusion 5 (Week 24)-1.67 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 15.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Social Function Score - Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL) 54 Instrument.Follow-Up (Week 42)-4.16 score on a scale (100 points total)Standard Deviation 27
Secondary

Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Change From Baseline 9-Hole Peg Test Scores - Non-Dominant Hand Avg Time Through Week 52

The 9-HPT is a short, standardized upper extremity exam. It measures the time taken to complete the test activity, recorded in seconds. The higher the score the worse the disability.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentAnalysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Change From Baseline 9-Hole Peg Test Scores - Non-Dominant Hand Avg Time Through Week 52-3.771 secondsStandard Error 1.069
PlaceboAnalysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Change From Baseline 9-Hole Peg Test Scores - Non-Dominant Hand Avg Time Through Week 52-4.747 secondsStandard Error 1.127
p-value: 0.558895% CI: [-2.504, 4.457]ANCOVA
Secondary

Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Change From Baseline Barthel Index Scores Through Week 52 - Efficacy Analysis Set

The Barthel index is an ordinal scale that evaluates functional independence in the domains of personal care and mobility. A total of ten variables describing activities of daily living and mobility are considered, with a higher number reflecting better capacity to operate independently. The Barthel Index assesses the level of help needed by a person on a set of ten activities of daily living (ADL) related to mobility and self-care. Score ranges from 0 points to 20 points, with lower scores indicating increased disability.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentAnalysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Change From Baseline Barthel Index Scores Through Week 52 - Efficacy Analysis Set2.359 score on a scale (20 points total)Standard Error 1.867
PlaceboAnalysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Change From Baseline Barthel Index Scores Through Week 52 - Efficacy Analysis Set-3.094 score on a scale (20 points total)Standard Error 1.962
p-value: 0.066695% CI: [-0.424, 11.33]ANCOVA
Secondary

Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Test Scores

The PHQ-9 is the most used depression and suicidal thoughts screening test used to monitor the severity of depression and response to treatment. Depression Severity: 0-4 none, 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, 20-27 severe.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentAnalysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Test Scores-4.330 score on a scale (27 points total)Standard Error 0.693
PlaceboAnalysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Test Scores0.263 score on a scale (27 points total)Standard Error 0.728
p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-6.773, -2.413]ANCOVA
Secondary

Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Total Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Scores Through Week 52 - Change From Baseline - Efficacy Analysis Set

The EDSS is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time. This scale ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5-unit increments and a higher score represents increased disability. Scoring is based on an examination by a neurologist.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentAnalysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Total Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Scores Through Week 52 - Change From Baseline - Efficacy Analysis Set-1.502 score on a scale (10 points total)Standard Error 0.424
PlaceboAnalysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Model - Total Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Scores Through Week 52 - Change From Baseline - Efficacy Analysis Set0.052 score on a scale (10 points total)Standard Error 0.446
p-value: 0.027895% CI: [-2.914, -0.195]ANCOVA
Secondary

ANCOVA Model - Change From Baseline 9-Hole Peg Test Scores - Dominant Hand Avg Time Through Week 52

The 9-HPT is a short, standardized upper extremity exam. It measures the time taken to complete the test activity, recorded in seconds. The higher the score the worse the disability.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentANCOVA Model - Change From Baseline 9-Hole Peg Test Scores - Dominant Hand Avg Time Through Week 520.472 secondsStandard Error 3.725
PlaceboANCOVA Model - Change From Baseline 9-Hole Peg Test Scores - Dominant Hand Avg Time Through Week 52-9.639 secondsStandard Error 3.915
p-value: 0.086395% CI: [-1.629, 21.853]ANCOVA
Secondary

Baseline Vitals Values - Height

Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentBaseline Vitals Values - Height166.17 cmStandard Error 3.151
PlaceboBaseline Vitals Values - Height167.86 cmStandard Error 2.626
Secondary

Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Abdomen

Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenFollow-Up - Week 42Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenEnd of Study - Week 52Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal12 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenFollow-Up - Week 42Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal12 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenEnd of Study - Week 52Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - AbdomenInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Cardiovascular

Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularFollow-Up - Week 42Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularEnd of Study - Week 52Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal12 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularFollow-Up - Week 42Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal12 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularEnd of Study - Week 52Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - CardiovascularInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENT

Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTFollow-Up - Week 42Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTEnd of Study - Week 52Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal12 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal12 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTFollow-Up - Week 42Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTEnd of Study - Week 52Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - HEENTEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal0 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph Node

Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeFollow-Up - Week 42Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeEnd of Study - Week 52Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal12 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeFollow-Up - Week 42Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal12 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeEnd of Study - Week 52Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Lymph NodeInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Musculoskeletal

Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal5 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal4 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal8 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal6 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal7 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal6 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal5 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal7 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal5 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal7 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal4 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal8 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalFollow-Up - Week 42Normal2 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal9 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalEnd of Study - Week 52Normal3 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal8 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal6 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal7 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal4 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalFollow-Up - Week 42Normal4 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal6 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal3 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal9 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalEnd of Study - Week 52Normal4 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal4 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal4 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal6 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal8 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal6 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal3 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal8 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - MusculoskeletalInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal4 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Neurological

Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal10 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal3 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal2 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal10 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal2 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalFollow-Up - Week 42Normal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal9 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalEnd of Study - Week 52Normal2 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal9 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal9 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal8 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalFollow-Up - Week 42Normal1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal9 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalEnd of Study - Week 52Normal2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal8 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - NeurologicalInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal10 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Respiratory

Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryFollow-Up - Week 42Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryEnd of Study - Week 52Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal12 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal12 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryFollow-Up - Week 42Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryEnd of Study - Week 52Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - RespiratoryInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal0 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline Physical Examination Results - Skin

Change From Baseline Physical Examination by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal12 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinFollow-Up - Week 42Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinEnd of Study - Week 52Normal11 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal0 Participants
TreatmentChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 6 - Week 32Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinEnd of Study - Week 52Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 4 - Week 16Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 1 (Baseline)Normal12 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinEnd of Study - Week 52Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 1 (Baseline)Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 5 - Week 24Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 1 (Baseline)Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 6 - Week 32Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 2 - Week 4Normal12 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 5 - Week 24Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 2 - Week 4Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinFollow-Up - Week 42Abnormal1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 2 - Week 4Not Examined (No longer in Study)0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinFollow-Up - Week 42Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 3 - Week 8Normal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 5 - Week 24Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 3 - Week 8Abnormal0 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinFollow-Up - Week 42Normal9 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 3 - Week 8Not Examined (No longer in Study)1 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 6 - Week 32Normal10 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 4 - Week 16Normal11 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinEnd of Study - Week 52Not Examined (No longer in Study)2 Participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline Physical Examination Results - SkinInfusion 4 - Week 16Abnormal0 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass Index

Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend starting at their follow-up visit (Week 42), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits starting at their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexInfusion 1 (Baseline)24.72 kg/m^2Standard Error 1.593
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexInfusion 2 - Week 40.05 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.112
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexInfusion 3 - Week 8-0.00 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.142
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexInfusion 4 - Week 160.46 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.399
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexInfusion 5 - Week 240.28 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.417
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexInfusion 6 - Week 320.47 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.436
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexFollow-Up - Week 420.61 kg/m^2Standard Error 1.014
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexEnd of Study - Week 520.37 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.591
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexEnd of Study - Week 52-0.02 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.505
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexInfusion 1 (Baseline)27.17 kg/m^2Standard Error 1.652
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexInfusion 5 - Week 24-0.19 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.332
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexInfusion 2 - Week 40.07 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.146
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexFollow-Up - Week 42-0.05 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.476
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexInfusion 3 - Week 8-0.04 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.164
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexInfusion 6 - Week 32-0.11 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.399
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Body Mass IndexInfusion 4 - Week 16-0.05 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.263
Secondary

Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend starting at their follow-up visit (Week 42), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits starting at their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureInfusion 1 (Baseline)76.3 mmHgStandard Error 1.9
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureInfusion 2 - Week 42.5 mmHgStandard Error 2
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureInfusion 3 - Week 8-1.3 mmHgStandard Error 1.97
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureInfusion 4 - Week 160.9 mmHgStandard Error 2.66
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureInfusion 5 - Week 24-3.2 mmHgStandard Error 2.17
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureInfusion 6 - Week 324.0 mmHgStandard Error 1.85
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureFollow-Up - Week 42-1.6 mmHgStandard Error 2.76
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureEnd of Study - Week 52-1.1 mmHgStandard Error 2.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureEnd of Study - Week 523.3 mmHgStandard Error 2.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureInfusion 1 (Baseline)78.9 mmHgStandard Error 1.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureInfusion 5 - Week 241.4 mmHgStandard Error 1.97
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureInfusion 2 - Week 41.1 mmHgStandard Error 1.91
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureFollow-Up - Week 423.6 mmHgStandard Error 3.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureInfusion 3 - Week 80.0 mmHgStandard Error 2.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureInfusion 6 - Week 322.6 mmHgStandard Error 2.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Diastolic Blood PressureInfusion 4 - Week 162.4 mmHgStandard Error 2.21
Secondary

Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen Saturation

Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend starting at their follow-up visit (Week 42), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits starting at their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationInfusion 1 (Baseline)98.4 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.23
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationInfusion 2 - Week 4-0.7 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.4
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationInfusion 3 - Week 8-0.4 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.38
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationInfusion 4 - Week 16-0.4 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.34
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationInfusion 5 - Week 240.0 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.3
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationInfusion 6 - Week 32-0.9 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.54
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationFollow-Up - Week 42-0.4 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.28
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationEnd of Study - Week 52-0.5 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationEnd of Study - Week 520.4 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.54
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationInfusion 1 (Baseline)98.0 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationInfusion 5 - Week 24-0.4 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationInfusion 2 - Week 40.6 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationFollow-Up - Week 42-0.5 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationInfusion 3 - Week 80.5 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationInfusion 6 - Week 320.3 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Oxygen SaturationInfusion 4 - Week 160.3 percent of oxygenStandard Error 0.47
Secondary

Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse Rate

Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend starting at their follow-up visit (Week 42), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits starting at their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateInfusion 1 (Baseline)71.8 beats per minuteStandard Error 3.16
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateInfusion 2 - Week 40.4 beats per minuteStandard Error 2.6
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateInfusion 3 - Week 83.3 beats per minuteStandard Error 3.4
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateInfusion 4 - Week 160.3 beats per minuteStandard Error 3.7
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateInfusion 5 - Week 24-2.6 beats per minuteStandard Error 2.71
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateInfusion 6 - Week 321.9 beats per minuteStandard Error 4.3
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateFollow-Up - Week 421.2 beats per minuteStandard Error 3.3
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateEnd of Study - Week 52-4.1 beats per minuteStandard Error 2.48
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateEnd of Study - Week 52-1.2 beats per minuteStandard Error 3.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateInfusion 1 (Baseline)76.2 beats per minuteStandard Error 1.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateInfusion 5 - Week 24-1.1 beats per minuteStandard Error 2.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateInfusion 2 - Week 4-0.9 beats per minuteStandard Error 2
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateFollow-Up - Week 42-4.0 beats per minuteStandard Error 2.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateInfusion 3 - Week 82.4 beats per minuteStandard Error 2.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateInfusion 6 - Week 32-2.1 beats per minuteStandard Error 2.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Pulse RateInfusion 4 - Week 162.0 beats per minuteStandard Error 2.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory Rate

Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend starting at their follow-up visit (Week 42), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits starting at their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateInfusion 1 (Baseline)16.7 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.28
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateInfusion 2 - Week 40.0 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.35
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateInfusion 3 - Week 80.0 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.35
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateInfusion 4 - Week 160.0 Breaths/minStandard Error 0
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateInfusion 5 - Week 24-0.2 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.17
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateInfusion 6 - Week 320.2 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.17
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateFollow-Up - Week 420.4 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.24
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateEnd of Study - Week 520.2 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateEnd of Study - Week 520.6 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateInfusion 1 (Baseline)16.3 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateInfusion 5 - Week 240.6 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateInfusion 2 - Week 40.2 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateFollow-Up - Week 420.6 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateInfusion 3 - Week 80.4 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.24
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateInfusion 6 - Week 320.2 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Respiratory RateInfusion 4 - Week 160.5 Breaths/minStandard Error 0.28
Secondary

Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood Pressure

Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend starting at their follow-up visit (Week 42), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits starting at their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureInfusion 1 (Baseline)119.2 mmHgStandard Error 2.9
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureInfusion 2 - Week 46.3 mmHgStandard Error 3.1
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureInfusion 3 - Week 8-5.0 mmHgStandard Error 2.11
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureInfusion 4 - Week 161.5 mmHgStandard Error 3.27
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureInfusion 5 - Week 24-3.5 mmHgStandard Error 3.18
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureInfusion 6 - Week 324.3 mmHgStandard Error 3.87
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureFollow-Up - Week 42-4.0 mmHgStandard Error 3.83
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureEnd of Study - Week 521.4 mmHgStandard Error 4.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureEnd of Study - Week 520.7 mmHgStandard Error 4.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureInfusion 1 (Baseline)122.2 mmHgStandard Error 3.72
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureInfusion 5 - Week 24-0.6 mmHgStandard Error 2.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureInfusion 2 - Week 40.8 mmHgStandard Error 2.74
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureFollow-Up - Week 42-1.1 mmHgStandard Error 2.52
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureInfusion 3 - Week 8-2.8 mmHgStandard Error 3.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureInfusion 6 - Week 321.5 mmHgStandard Error 3.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - Systolic Blood PressureInfusion 4 - Week 165.4 mmHgStandard Error 3.25
Secondary

Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Temperature

Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend starting at their follow-up visit (Week 42), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits starting at their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureInfusion 1 (Baseline)36.66 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.073
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureInfusion 2 - Week 4-0.01 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.083
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureInfusion 3 - Week 80.03 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.095
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureInfusion 4 - Week 16-0.03 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.074
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureInfusion 5 - Week 240.04 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.084
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureInfusion 6 - Week 32-0.08 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.102
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureFollow-Up - Week 42-0.10 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.077
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureEnd of Study - Week 52-0.02 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.088
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureEnd of Study - Week 52-0.11 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.132
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureInfusion 1 (Baseline)36.84 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureInfusion 5 - Week 24-0.17 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.115
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureInfusion 2 - Week 4-0.23 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureFollow-Up - Week 42-0.15 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.092
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureInfusion 3 - Week 8-0.21 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.108
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureInfusion 6 - Week 32-0.18 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.101
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - TemperatureInfusion 4 - Week 16-0.06 degrees CelsiusStandard Error 0.095
Secondary

Change From Baseline Vitals Values - Weight

Change From Baseline Vitals by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend starting at their follow-up visit (Week 42), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits starting at their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightInfusion 1 (Baseline)68.61 kgStandard Error 5.05
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightInfusion 2 - Week 40.15 kgStandard Error 0.309
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightInfusion 3- Week 8-0.04 kgStandard Error 0.385
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightInfusion 4- Week 161.02 kgStandard Error 0.972
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightInfusion 5- Week 240.56 kgStandard Error 1.043
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightInfusion 6- Week 321.05 kgStandard Error 1.105
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightFollow-Up- Week 421.19 kgStandard Error 2.665
TreatmentChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightEnd of Study- Week 520.82 kgStandard Error 1.519
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightEnd of Study- Week 520.03 kgStandard Error 1.332
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightInfusion 1 (Baseline)76.55 kgStandard Error 4.797
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightInfusion 5- Week 24-0.56 kgStandard Error 0.923
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightInfusion 2 - Week 40.18 kgStandard Error 0.406
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightFollow-Up- Week 42-0.14 kgStandard Error 1.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightInfusion 3- Week 8-0.05 kgStandard Error 0.441
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightInfusion 6- Week 32-0.31 kgStandard Error 1.149
PlaceboChange From Baseline Vitals Values - WeightInfusion 4- Week 16-0.18 kgStandard Error 0.727
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CBC (fL)

Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of fL.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (fL)MCV - Baseline91.36 fLStandard Error 1.332
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (fL)MCV - Week 24-0.60 fLStandard Error 0.937
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (fL)MCV - Week 520.15 fLStandard Error 0.9
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (fL)MCV - Baseline90.59 fLStandard Error 1.163
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (fL)MCV - Week 240.65 fLStandard Error 0.447
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (fL)MCV - Week 521.32 fLStandard Error 0.857
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)

Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of g/dL

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)Hemoglobin - Baseline13.60 g/dLStandard Error 0.301
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)Hemoglobin - Week 24-0.18 g/dLStandard Error 0.281
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)Hemoglobin- Week 520.21 g/dLStandard Error 0.168
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)MCHC - Baseline34.13 g/dLStandard Error 0.233
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)MCHC - Week 24-0.01 g/dLStandard Error 0.34
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)MCHC- Week 52-0.31 g/dLStandard Error 0.236
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)MCHC - Week 240.31 g/dLStandard Error 0.312
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)Hemoglobin - Baseline13.68 g/dLStandard Error 0.41
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)MCHC - Baseline33.53 g/dLStandard Error 0.233
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)Hemoglobin - Week 240.61 g/dLStandard Error 0.498
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)MCHC- Week 52-0.06 g/dLStandard Error 0.352
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (g/dL)Hemoglobin- Week 520.81 g/dLStandard Error 0.401
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CBC (% of Total Blood Cell Count)

Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of % of total blood cell count.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of Total Blood Cell Count)Hematocrit - Baseline39.80 % of total blood cell countStandard Error 0.736
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of Total Blood Cell Count)Hematocrit - Week 24-0.48 % of total blood cell countStandard Error 1.064
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of Total Blood Cell Count)Hematocrit- Week 521.02 % of total blood cell countStandard Error 0.562
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of Total Blood Cell Count)Hematocrit - Baseline40.77 % of total blood cell countStandard Error 1.111
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of Total Blood Cell Count)Hematocrit - Week 241.43 % of total blood cell countStandard Error 1.392
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of Total Blood Cell Count)Hematocrit- Week 522.51 % of total blood cell countStandard Error 1.116
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)

Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of % of white blood cell count.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Eosinophils - Week 240.18 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 0.656
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Lymphocytes - Week 52-3.46 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 2.907
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Basophils - Week 240.22 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 0.292
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Monocytes - Baseline8.59 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 1.046
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Eosinophils - Week 52-0.01 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 0.591
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Monocytes - Week 24-0.15 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 1.124
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Eosinophils - Baseline1.86 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 0.552
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Monocytes - Week 521.83 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 1.166
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Lymphocytes - Baseline27.98 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 3.068
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Neutrophils - Baseline61.17 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 2.777
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Basophils - Week 520.03 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 0.259
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Neutrophils - Week 24-2.06 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 3.201
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Lymphocytes - Week 241.58 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 2.945
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Neutrophils - Week 521.38 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 3.861
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Basophils - Baseline0.40 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 0.161
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Neutrophils - Week 52-2.21 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 5.063
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Basophils - Baseline0.74 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 0.192
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Basophils - Week 240.09 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 0.308
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Basophils - Week 52-0.13 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 0.256
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Eosinophils - Baseline2.02 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 0.409
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Eosinophils - Week 241.06 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 0.861
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Eosinophils - Week 520.42 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 0.373
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Lymphocytes - Baseline24.41 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 2.049
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Lymphocytes - Week 241.21 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 3.152
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Lymphocytes - Week 521.77 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 4.329
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Monocytes - Baseline9.10 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 1.215
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Monocytes - Week 24-0.76 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 1.735
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Monocytes - Week 52-0.02 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 1.564
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Neutrophils - Baseline63.73 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 2.516
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (% of WBC)Neutrophils - Week 24-1.68 % of white blood cell countStandard Error 4.138
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CBC (pg)

Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of pg

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (pg)MCH - Baseline31.20 pgStandard Error 0.542
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (pg)MCH - Week 24-0.23 pgStandard Error 0.371
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (pg)MCH- Week 52-0.25 pgStandard Error 0.276
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (pg)MCH - Baseline30.38 pgStandard Error 0.471
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (pg)MCH - Week 240.50 pgStandard Error 0.286
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (pg)MCH- Week 520.44 pgStandard Error 0.465
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CBC (RDW)

Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of % (RDW - Red Cell Distribution Width)

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (RDW)RDW - Baseline12.51 percentageStandard Error 0.337
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (RDW)RDW - Week 240.21 percentageStandard Error 0.155
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (RDW)RDW - Week 520.07 percentageStandard Error 0.141
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (RDW)RDW - Baseline12.82 percentageStandard Error 0.162
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (RDW)RDW - Week 240.57 percentageStandard Error 0.585
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (RDW)RDW - Week 520.35 percentageStandard Error 0.582
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)

Unit (x10\^3 cells/uL) - Change From Baseline Clinical Laboratory Complete Blood Count (CBC) by Treatment Week - Descriptive Statistics - Safety Analysis Set

Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Monocytes - Week 24-0.030 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0479
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Eosinophils - Week 520.027 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0302
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Monocytes - Week 520.069 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0543
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Basophils - Week 240.008 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0063
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Neutrophils - Baseline3.348 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.407
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Lymphocytes - Baseline1.345 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0956
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Neutrophils - Week 240.470 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.4303
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Eosinophils - Baseline0.107 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0267
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Neutrophils - Week 520.681 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.5759
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Lymphocytes - Week 240.098 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.1275
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Platelet Count - Baseline260.6 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 20.61
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Basophils - Baseline0.027 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0048
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Platelet Count - Week 241.1 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 8.64
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Lymphocytes - Week 520.155 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.1179
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Platelet Count - Week 5219.9 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 8.45
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Eosinophils - Week 24-0.001 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0172
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)WBC - Baseline5.35 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.447
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Monocytes - Baseline0.501 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0536
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)WBC - Week 240.54 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.45
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)WBC - Week 520.95 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.577
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Basophils - Week 520.008 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0064
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)WBC - Week 520.30 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.537
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Basophils - Baseline0.030 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0051
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Basophils - Week 240.003 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.005
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Basophils - Week 52-0.001 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0053
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Eosinophils - Baseline0.113 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0221
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Eosinophils - Week 240.018 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0156
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Eosinophils - Week 520.012 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.015
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Lymphocytes - Baseline1.220 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.137
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Lymphocytes - Week 240.061 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0631
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Lymphocytes - Week 520.072 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0797
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Monocytes - Baseline0.494 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0549
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Monocytes - Week 24-0.008 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0296
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Monocytes - Week 520.009 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.0307
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Neutrophils - Baseline3.872 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.4055
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Neutrophils - Week 24-0.066 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.5305
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Absolute Neutrophils - Week 520.201 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.5813
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Platelet Count - Baseline227.1 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 20.28
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Platelet Count - Week 2411.1 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 11.83
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)Platelet Count - Week 529.5 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 7.81
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)WBC - Baseline5.75 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.504
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^3 Cells/uL)WBC - Week 240.01 (x10^3 cells/uL)Standard Error 0.512
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CBC (x10^6 Cells/uL)

Changes from baseline in CBC laboratory values with unit of x10\^6 cells/uL.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^6 Cells/uL)RBC - Baseline4.362 x10^6 cells/uLStandard Error 0.0772
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^6 Cells/uL)RBC - Week 24-0.027 x10^6 cells/uLStandard Error 0.113
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^6 Cells/uL)RBC - Week 520.100 x10^6 cells/uLStandard Error 0.0645
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^6 Cells/uL)RBC - Baseline4.507 x10^6 cells/uLStandard Error 0.1293
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^6 Cells/uL)RBC - Week 240.134 x10^6 cells/uLStandard Error 0.1769
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CBC (x10^6 Cells/uL)RBC - Week 520.222 x10^6 cells/uLStandard Error 0.1571
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)

Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with unit of g/dL.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Albumin - Week 24-0.03 g/dLStandard Error 0.093
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Calc Globulin - Week 52-0.14 g/dLStandard Error 0.059
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Calc Globulin - Baseline2.53 g/dLStandard Error 0.1
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Protein - Baseline7.23 g/dLStandard Error 0.12
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Albumin - Week 520.00 g/dLStandard Error 0.086
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Protein - Week 24-0.17 g/dLStandard Error 0.14
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Calc Globulin - Week 24-0.14 g/dLStandard Error 0.075
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Protein - Week 52-0.14 g/dLStandard Error 0.106
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Albumin - Baseline4.70 g/dLStandard Error 0.089
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Protein - Week 52-0.08 g/dLStandard Error 0.085
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Albumin - Baseline4.64 g/dLStandard Error 0.071
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Albumin - Week 24-0.03 g/dLStandard Error 0.122
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Albumin - Week 52-0.03 g/dLStandard Error 0.091
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Calc Globulin - Baseline2.10 g/dLStandard Error 0.072
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Calc Globulin - Week 24-0.06 g/dLStandard Error 0.072
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Calc Globulin - Week 52-0.05 g/dLStandard Error 0.064
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Protein - Baseline6.74 g/dLStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (g/dL)Protein - Week 24-0.09 g/dLStandard Error 0.146
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)

Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with units of mEq/L.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Chloride - Baseline103.5 mEq/LStandard Error 0.97
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Chloride - Week 24-0.3 mEq/LStandard Error 0.71
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Chloride - Week 520.2 mEq/LStandard Error 0.64
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Carbon Dioxide - Baseline25.2 mEq/LStandard Error 0.76
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Carbon Dioxide - Week 240.1 mEq/LStandard Error 0.58
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Carbon Dioxide - Week 520.5 mEq/LStandard Error 0.39
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Potassium - Baseline4.47 mEq/LStandard Error 0.128
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Potassium - Week 24-0.22 mEq/LStandard Error 0.135
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Potassium - Week 52-0.11 mEq/LStandard Error 0.164
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Sodium - Baseline142.0 mEq/LStandard Error 0.76
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Sodium - Week 24-0.9 mEq/LStandard Error 0.85
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Sodium - Week 52-0.4 mEq/LStandard Error 0.51
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Sodium - Week 241.0 mEq/LStandard Error 0.47
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Chloride - Baseline103.7 mEq/LStandard Error 0.81
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Potassium - Baseline4.31 mEq/LStandard Error 0.061
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Chloride - Week 241.4 mEq/LStandard Error 0.83
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Sodium - Baseline140.5 mEq/LStandard Error 0.53
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Chloride - Week 520.8 mEq/LStandard Error 1.1
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Potassium - Week 24-0.13 mEq/LStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Carbon Dioxide - Baseline24.7 mEq/LStandard Error 0.63
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Sodium - Week 520.7 mEq/LStandard Error 0.82
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Carbon Dioxide - Week 240.1 mEq/LStandard Error 0.72
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Potassium - Week 52-0.11 mEq/LStandard Error 0.077
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mEq/L)Carbon Dioxide - Week 520.1 mEq/LStandard Error 0.86
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)

Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with units of mg/dL.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Glucose - Week 522.5 mg/dLStandard Error 1.83
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Bilirubin - Baseline0.41 mg/dLStandard Error 0.045
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Bilirubin - Week 240.01 mg/dLStandard Error 0.06
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Bilirubin - Week 52-0.02 mg/dLStandard Error 0.038
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Calcium - Baseline9.78 mg/dLStandard Error 0.099
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Calcium - Week 24-0.20 mg/dLStandard Error 0.145
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Calcium - Week 52-0.11 mg/dLStandard Error 0.11
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Creatinine - Baseline0.756 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0453
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Creatinine - Week 240.008 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0288
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Creatinine - Week 52-0.001 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0262
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)BUN - Baseline14.3 mg/dLStandard Error 1.31
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)BUN - Week 24-0.5 mg/dLStandard Error 1.05
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)BUN - Week 521.5 mg/dLStandard Error 0.86
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Glucose - Baseline95.3 mg/dLStandard Error 3.58
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Glucose - Week 24-1.9 mg/dLStandard Error 3.45
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Glucose - Week 52-1.6 mg/dLStandard Error 3.81
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Creatinine - Week 24-0.000 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0278
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Bilirubin - Baseline0.44 mg/dLStandard Error 0.051
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)BUN - Week 52-0.1 mg/dLStandard Error 1.09
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Bilirubin - Week 240.15 mg/dLStandard Error 0.062
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Creatinine - Week 520.024 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0348
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Bilirubin - Week 520.09 mg/dLStandard Error 0.062
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Glucose - Week 24-3.6 mg/dLStandard Error 3.77
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Calcium - Baseline9.51 mg/dLStandard Error 0.108
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)BUN - Baseline13.4 mg/dLStandard Error 1.2
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Calcium - Week 24-0.15 mg/dLStandard Error 0.134
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Glucose - Baseline94.1 mg/dLStandard Error 2.04
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Calcium - Week 52-0.03 mg/dLStandard Error 0.128
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)BUN - Week 240.6 mg/dLStandard Error 1.25
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mg/dL)Creatinine - Baseline0.827 mg/dLStandard Error 0.0472
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CMP (mL/Min/1.73m^2)

Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with units of mL/min/1.73m\^2.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mL/Min/1.73m^2)Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Week 52-0.8 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Error 1.75
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mL/Min/1.73m^2)Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Baseline99.5 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Error 2.41
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (mL/Min/1.73m^2)Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Week 24-1.7 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Error 2.28
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mL/Min/1.73m^2)Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Week 240.2 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Error 3.18
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mL/Min/1.73m^2)Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Baseline94.4 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Error 5.65
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (mL/Min/1.73m^2)Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Week 52-2.7 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Error 3.99
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Albumin (g/dL) to Calc. Globulin (g/dL))

Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with units of Ratio: Albumin(g/dL) to Calc. Globulin(g/dL)

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Albumin (g/dL) to Calc. Globulin (g/dL))Calc A/G - Baseline1.89 Ratio: Albumin(g/dL) to Globulin(g/dLStandard Error 0.086
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Albumin (g/dL) to Calc. Globulin (g/dL))Calc A/G - Week 240.10 Ratio: Albumin(g/dL) to Globulin(g/dLStandard Error 0.066
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Albumin (g/dL) to Calc. Globulin (g/dL))Calc A/G - Week 520.11 Ratio: Albumin(g/dL) to Globulin(g/dLStandard Error 0.076
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Albumin (g/dL) to Calc. Globulin (g/dL))Calc A/G - Baseline2.23 Ratio: Albumin(g/dL) to Globulin(g/dLStandard Error 0.086
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Albumin (g/dL) to Calc. Globulin (g/dL))Calc A/G - Week 240.08 Ratio: Albumin(g/dL) to Globulin(g/dLStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Albumin (g/dL) to Calc. Globulin (g/dL))Calc A/G - Week 520.04 Ratio: Albumin(g/dL) to Globulin(g/dLStandard Error 0.09
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) to Creatinine (mg/dL))

Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with units of Ratio: Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) to Creatinine (mg/dL).

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) to Creatinine (mg/dL))Calc BUN/Creat - Baseline19.7 Ratio:Urea nit.(mg/dL) /creatinin(mg/dL)Standard Error 2.44
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) to Creatinine (mg/dL))Calc BUN/Creat - Week 24-0.6 Ratio:Urea nit.(mg/dL) /creatinin(mg/dL)Standard Error 1.43
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) to Creatinine (mg/dL))Calc BUN/Creat - Week 522.5 Ratio:Urea nit.(mg/dL) /creatinin(mg/dL)Standard Error 1.15
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) to Creatinine (mg/dL))Calc BUN/Creat - Baseline16.3 Ratio:Urea nit.(mg/dL) /creatinin(mg/dL)Standard Error 1
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) to Creatinine (mg/dL))Calc BUN/Creat - Week 240.4 Ratio:Urea nit.(mg/dL) /creatinin(mg/dL)Standard Error 1.61
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (Ratio: Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) to Creatinine (mg/dL))Calc BUN/Creat - Week 52-0.6 Ratio:Urea nit.(mg/dL) /creatinin(mg/dL)Standard Error 1.59
Secondary

Laboratory Values - CMP (U/L)

Changes from baseline in CMP laboratory values with units of U/L.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)Alkaline Phosphatase - Week 24-2.6 U/LStandard Error 4.67
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)ALT - Week 521.9 U/LStandard Error 4.03
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)ALT - Baseline23.9 U/LStandard Error 2.66
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)AST - Baseline25.7 U/LStandard Error 2.56
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)Alkaline Phosphatase - Week 525.5 U/LStandard Error 4.75
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)AST - Week 24-3.1 U/LStandard Error 2.07
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)ALT - Week 24-1.4 U/LStandard Error 1.94
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)AST - Week 52-2.8 U/LStandard Error 2.91
TreatmentLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)Alkaline Phosphatase - Baseline77.5 U/LStandard Error 9.35
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)AST - Week 52-0.8 U/LStandard Error 1.1
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)Alkaline Phosphatase - Baseline69.0 U/LStandard Error 4.11
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)Alkaline Phosphatase - Week 24-0.3 U/LStandard Error 2.48
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)Alkaline Phosphatase - Week 521.0 U/LStandard Error 1.93
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)ALT - Baseline17.7 U/LStandard Error 1.05
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)ALT - Week 242.9 U/LStandard Error 1.97
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)ALT - Week 52-0.1 U/LStandard Error 1.51
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)AST - Baseline18.3 U/LStandard Error 1.5
PlaceboLaboratory Values - CMP (U/L)AST - Week 242.1 U/LStandard Error 1.92
Secondary

Laboratory Values. Coagulation Panel (Ratio: Prothrombin Time (Seconds) / Mean Normal Prothrombin Time (Seconds))

Changes from baseline in Coagulation laboratory values with units of Ratio: Prothrombin time (seconds) / Mean normal prothrombin time (seconds).

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values. Coagulation Panel (Ratio: Prothrombin Time (Seconds) / Mean Normal Prothrombin Time (Seconds))INR - Baseline0.94 Ratio: PT (seconds) / MNPT (seconds)Standard Error 0.019
TreatmentLaboratory Values. Coagulation Panel (Ratio: Prothrombin Time (Seconds) / Mean Normal Prothrombin Time (Seconds))INR - Week 240.11 Ratio: PT (seconds) / MNPT (seconds)Standard Error 0.092
TreatmentLaboratory Values. Coagulation Panel (Ratio: Prothrombin Time (Seconds) / Mean Normal Prothrombin Time (Seconds))INR - Week 520.14 Ratio: PT (seconds) / MNPT (seconds)Standard Error 0.119
PlaceboLaboratory Values. Coagulation Panel (Ratio: Prothrombin Time (Seconds) / Mean Normal Prothrombin Time (Seconds))INR - Baseline0.96 Ratio: PT (seconds) / MNPT (seconds)Standard Error 0.015
PlaceboLaboratory Values. Coagulation Panel (Ratio: Prothrombin Time (Seconds) / Mean Normal Prothrombin Time (Seconds))INR - Week 240.04 Ratio: PT (seconds) / MNPT (seconds)Standard Error 0.016
PlaceboLaboratory Values. Coagulation Panel (Ratio: Prothrombin Time (Seconds) / Mean Normal Prothrombin Time (Seconds))INR - Week 520.02 Ratio: PT (seconds) / MNPT (seconds)Standard Error 0.013
Secondary

Laboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)

Changes from baseline in Coagulation Panel values with units of seconds.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and End of Study (Week 52)

Population: One patient from the treatment group was unable to attend their end of study visit (Week 52), and two patients from the Placebo group stopped attending visits from before their Infusion 5 visit (Week 24) .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentLaboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)Prothrombin Time (PT) - Week 241.00 SecondsStandard Error 0.833
TreatmentLaboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)PTT - Baseline29.78 SecondsStandard Error 1.056
TreatmentLaboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)Prothrombin Time (PT) - Baseline12.95 SecondsStandard Error 0.183
TreatmentLaboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)PTT - Week 240.73 SecondsStandard Error 0.936
TreatmentLaboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)Prothrombin Time (PT) - Week 521.28 SecondsStandard Error 1.064
TreatmentLaboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)PTT - Week 522.63 SecondsStandard Error 1.712
PlaceboLaboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)Prothrombin Time (PT) - Week 520.12 SecondsStandard Error 0.049
PlaceboLaboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)Prothrombin Time (PT) - Baseline13.23 SecondsStandard Error 0.152
PlaceboLaboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)Prothrombin Time (PT) - Week 240.08 SecondsStandard Error 0.096
PlaceboLaboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)PTT - Week 52-1.22 SecondsStandard Error 0.707
PlaceboLaboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)PTT - Baseline30.06 SecondsStandard Error 0.618
PlaceboLaboratory Values - Coagulation Panel (Seconds)PTT - Week 24-0.88 SecondsStandard Error 0.528

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026