Skip to content

Remifentanil Effect-site Prediction by Algometry

Remifentanil Pharmacodynamics During Conscious Sedation From the Algometry Perspective. An Essential Standpoint to be Considered in Opioids Time-course Modelling Validation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05115578
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-11-10
Start date
2017-03-01
Completion date
2020-09-30
Last updated
2021-11-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conscious Sedation Failure During Procedure

Keywords

Remifentanil, Algometry, Pharmacodynamics, TCI Infusion system, Conscious Sedation

Brief summary

This study validates the pharmacodynamic analgesic predictions (effect) given by Minto's remifentanil pharmacokinetic and dynamic model in conscious sedation. This standard model is based on the electroencephalogram (EEG) changes induced by this opioid as a proxy for describing the remifentanil analgesic effect, which might be only valid for high concentrations. Validation of the standard remifentanil model for low concentrations under sedation is needed for safer remifentanil administration.

Detailed description

According to pharmacokinetic and-dynamic (PK/PD) models, the proper use of anesthetics depends on the effect-sites mechanisms and the time-courses of action. This aspect is crucial for the practitioners to target the desired effect-site concentrations of the drugs (drug concentration at brain) by optimizing the drug administration using target control infusion (TCI) systems operating under these model predictions. For more than two decades, the pharmacodynamic properties of remifentanil relied on Minto's model, which is based on processed EEG as the reference to quantify the analgesic effect and effect-site concentration estimate. This remifentanil pharmacodynamic was modeled under conditions administered to volunteers rapidly and at very high doses to induce substantial changes in the spontaneous processed EEG. The experimental concentrations and infusion rates are far from sedative levels, where the EEG has shown a clear response to hypnosis but not to analgesia or nociception. Under the hypothesis that pharmacological models should predict equally well the effects induced by drugs at different concentrations levels, the purpose of this study is to evaluate and validate the pharmacodynamic predictions given by Minto's model in patients under conscious sedation using the algometry as a reference of nociception. The study recruits 100 female patients scheduled for benign gynecological surgery divided into three groups. A group of 35 patients receives a constant TCI effect-site target infusion of 1.5 ng/ml of remifentanil for 25 min. The second group of 35 follow the same protocol with a bolus of 1 mg of midazolam before the remifentanil infusion. The rest configures the control group under saline solution. Experimental data consist of basal algometry (pressure pain threshold) aside from BIS index, blood pressure, and heart rate values and at time-points of 1.5, 5, 10, 15, 18, 20, and 25 minutes after induction. Minto's remifentanil pharmacodynamic model validation relies on comparing the levels and temporal evolution of the algometry measurements during the whole experiment concerning the effect-site estimations provided by the TCI-pump Minto's model.

Interventions

DRUGRemifentanil 1 MG Injection [Ultiva]

Group I TCI effect-site target infusion of 1.5 ng/ml of remifentanil.

DRUGMidazolam 1 MG/ML Prefilled Syringe

Group II TCI effect-site target infusion of 1.5 ng/ml of remifentanil + 1 mg Midazolam iv

DRUGSaline solution

Group III Control

DEVICEAlgometry

The algometry technique is used to assess the pain pressure threshold as an analgesic effect of remifentanil concerning Minto's model prediction.

Sponsors

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients scheduled for benign gynaecological surgery * 18-80 years old * ASA I-III

Exclusion criteria

* Morbid obesity * Conduct disorder or anxiety-depressive syndrome * Chronic treatment with psychotropic drugs or opiates * Pregnancy * Alcohol abuse * Documented allergy to remifentanil or midazolam * Refusal to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 15 minutes15 minutesMeasurement of pressure pain threshold(0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 15 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) BaselineBaselineMeasurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry before starting the administration of remifentanil.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 1.5 minutes1.5 minutesMeasurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 1.5 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 5 minutes5 minutesMeasurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 5 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 10 minutes10 minutesMeasurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 10 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 18 minutes18 minutesMeasurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 18 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 20 minutes20 minutesMeasurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 20 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 25 minutes25 minutesMeasurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 25 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Infusion rateContinous measurements every 1 second for the whole experiment of 25 minutesRemifentanil infusion rate (ml/h) administered during the experiment to the patient provided by the TCI system.
Remifentanil Plasma Concentration (Cp)Continous measurements every 1 second for the whole experiment of 25 minutesPatient's remifentanil plasma concentration (ng/ml) evolution during the experiment given by Minto's model implemented in the TCI system.
Remifentanil Effect Concentration (Ce)Continous measurements every 1 second for the whole experiment of 25 minutesPatient's remifentanil effect concentration (ng/ml) evolution during the experiment given by Minto's model implemented in the TCI system.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart Rate (HR) 5 min5 minutesMeasurement of heart rate (beats/min) 5 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Heart Rate (HR) 10 min10 minutesMeasurement of heart rate (beats/min) 10 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Heart Rate (HR) 15 min15 minutesMeasurement of heart rate (beats/min) 15 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Heart Rate (HR) 18 min18 minutesMeasurement of heart rate (beats/min) 18 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Heart Rate (HR) 20 min20 minutesMeasurement of heart rate (beats/min) 20 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Bispectrum (BIS) BaselineBaselineBaseline measurement of EEG Bispectral index (adimensional index from 0- to 100).
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 15 min15 minutesMeasurement of mean arterial pressure (mmHg) 15 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Bispectrum (BIS) 5 minutes5 minutesEEG Bispectral index (adimensional index from 0- to 100) 5 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Bispectrum (BIS) 10 minutes10 minutesEEG Bispectral index (adimensional index from 0- to 100) 10 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Bispectrum (BIS) 15 minutes15 minutesEEG Bispectral index (adimensional index from 0- to 100) 15 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Bispectrum (BIS) 20 minutes20 minutesEEG Bispectral index (adimensional index from 0- to 100) 20 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Bispectrum (BIS) 25 minutes25 minutesEEG Bispectral index (adimensional index from 0- to 100) 25 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Bispectrum (BIS) 1.5 minutes1.5 minutesEEG Bispectral index (adimensional index from 0- to 100) 1.5 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
AgeSingle annotation.Apart from standard anthropometric data (Weight, Height, etc), age is of significant relevance for evaluating the possible effect of age on the pharmacodynamic properties of remifentanil and the algometry.
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) BaselineBaselineBaseline mean arterial pressure (mmHg) from standard hemodynamic monitor.
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 1.5 min1.5 minutesMeasurement of mean arterial pressure (mmHg) 1.5 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 5 min5 minutesMeasurement of mean arterial pressure (mmHg) 5 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 10 min10 minutesMeasurement of mean arterial pressure (mmHg) 10 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 18 min18 minutesMeasurement of mean arterial pressure (mmHg) 18 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 20 min20 minutesMeasurement of mean arterial pressure (mmHg) 20 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 25 min25 minutesMeasurement of mean arterial pressure (mmHg) 25 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
Heart Rate (HR) BaselineBaselineBaseline measurement of heart rate (beats/min)
Heart Rate (HR) 1.5 min1.5 minutesMeasurement of heart rate (beats/min) 1.5 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026