Binge-Eating Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
Centanafadine, Binge Eating Disorder
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of 2 doses of centanafadine sustained-release (SR) (200 milligrams \[mg\] and 400 mg total daily dose \[TDD\]) compared with placebo in adults with moderate to severe binge eating disorder (BED).
Interventions
Sustained-release oral tablets
Oral tablets
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Double blind
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult participants 18 to 65 years of age (inclusive) at the time of informed consent. * A primary diagnosis of BED, or is diagnosed at screening, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria and confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID). * BED with a history of at least 2 binge eating days per week for 6 months prior to screening. * A rating of 4 or higher on the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) at screening and baseline. * Body mass index (BMI) of 18 to 45 kg/m\^2, inclusive.
Exclusion criteria
* Lifetime history of bulimia nervosa or anorexia nervosa. * Participation in a formal weight loss program within 3 months of screening or planning to start a weight loss program during the trial. * History of bariatric surgery. * Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≥ 18.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per Week | Baseline, Weeks 7 to 8 | Binge eating day was defined as a day with at least one binge eating episode. Least squares (LS) mean was determined by Mixed-effect Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method with change from baseline in binge eating days per week at scheduled visit as dependent variable and included fixed effect terms for treatment, trial center, visit week, and an interaction term of treatment by visit week. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Suicidality as Measured by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score | Week 8 | The C-SSRS is a clinician-administered instrument that systematically assess suicidal ideation (SI) and suicidal behavior rating scale. It rates an individual's degree of SI on a scale, ranging from wish to be dead to active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent. The scale identifies SI severity and intensity, which may be indicative of an individual's intent to commit suicide. C-SSRS SI severity subscale ranges from 0 (no SI) to 5 (active SI with plan and intent). The scale identifies specific behaviors ranging from preparatory acts or behavior to suicide which may be indicative of an individual's intent to complete suicide. Suicidality was reported in this outcome measure, defined as at least 1 occurrence of suicidal ideation or at least 1 occurrence of suicidal behavior for each assessment period. |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Baseline, Week 8 | The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-administered global rating scale that measures disease severity on scale with a score range of 0 to 7 where, 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. A higher score on the CGI-S represents a higher severity of disease. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks) | An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered an IMP and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AESIs were newly acquired skin eruptions that were non-traumatic which included eruptions such as skin rashes, skin irritations, skin reactions, or acneiform lesions. AEs related to abuse included: Feeling abnormal (floaty feeling in the head), euphoric mood (feeling high). MHIs included: IMP accounting errors, not involving suspected abuse nor diversion by participant; Non-compliance with trial procedures, not involving suspected abuse nor diversion by participant; and other cases involving neither suspected abuse nor diversion of trial IMP by participant. |
| Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks) | Laboratory assessments included hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis. Abnormality criteria included: In milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) \[high bilirubin ≥2.0, low/high calcium ≤8.2/ ≥12, high cholesterol fasting ≥240, high glucose, fasting ≥100, high triglycerides, fasting ≥150, high urate ≥8.5 female / ≥10.5 male, high protein urine ≥2 units increase\]; high creatine kinase (units per liter \[U/L\]) \>3xupper limit of normal (ULN); high eosinophils/leukocytes ≥10%, low neutrophils/leukocytes ≤15%; In 10\^3/microliter (µL) \[low or high leukocytes ≤2.8x10\^9/L or ≥16.0x10\^9/L, low neutrophils ≤1.5x10\^9/L\]. The categories with at least one participant with clinically relevant value are reported here. |
| Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks) | Vital sign measurements included heart rate in supine and standing positions (low: \<50 beats per minute \[bpm\] and decrease ≥10 bpm; High: \>100 bpm and increase ≥10 bpm), systolic blood pressure (BP) in supine and standing positions (low: \<90 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\] and decrease ≥20 mmHg; High: ≥140 mmHg and increase ≥20 mmHg), diastolic BP in supine and standing positions (low: \<60 mmHg and decrease ≥10 mmHg; High: ≥90 mmHg and increase ≥10 mmHg), weight in kilograms (kg) (low: ≥7% decrease; High: ≥7% increase), orthostatic hypotension, (≥30mmHg decrease is systolic BP or ≥20 mmHg in diastolic BP after at least 3 minutes of standing compared to the previous supine BP), and orthostatic tachycardia (≥25 bpm increase in heart rate from supine to standing). The categories with at least one participant with clinically relevant value are reported here. |
| Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks) | 12-lead ECG abnormality criteria included Rhythm: Supraventricular premature beat (not present at baseline and present post baseline); and Conduction: Primary (1°) atrioventricular block (PR ≥200 milliseconds \[msec\] and increase of ≥50 msec). |
| Study Medication Withdrawal Questionnaire (SMWQ) Total Mean Score | Week 8 | SMWQ is a questionnaire to assess withdrawal symptoms subsequent to completion of dosing with IMP. The SMWQ is a modification of the Amphetamine Withdrawal Questionnaire, in which in which the terms amphetamines and methamphetamine are replaced with the term the study medication. This change was intended to prevent bias by implying that the trial medication might be an amphetamine or amphetamine-like stimulant when presented with the survey. This questionnaire comprises of 13 items which describe symptoms associated with the cessation of study medication use for which participants indicate severity on a scale with scores ranging from 0 (no withdrawal symptoms) to 4 (most severe withdrawal symptom). The total score is calculated as the sum of all the scores for the 13 items, ranging from 0 to 52. Lower scores indicate less withdrawal symptoms. |
| Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score | Baseline, Week 8 | The HAM-A scale assesses both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). It consists of 14 items to rate the severity of symptoms of anxiety, each scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe. Total score was calculated as the sum of the 14 individual item scores, ranging from 0 to 56 and categorized as 0-13: normal range, 14-17: mild severity, 18-24: mild to moderate severity, 25-30: moderate to severe, and \>=31: severe. A higher score indicates a more severe anxiety. |
| Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score | Baseline, Week 8 | The MADRS is a diagnostic questionnaire used by clinician to assess the participant's severity of depression. The questionnaire includes questions on ten symptoms: Apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, difficulty concentrating, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Each question is scored on a range of 0 to 6 points and the total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores, ranging from 0 to 60 categorized as: 0 to 6: normal/symptoms absent, 7 to 19: mild depression, 20 to 34: moderate depression, and 35 to 60: severe depression. Higher scores indicate increased depressive symptoms. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score | Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 | The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-administered global rating scale that measures disease severity on scale with a score range of 0 to 7 where, 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. A higher score on the CGI-S represents a higher severity of disease. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates. |
| Mean Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Score | Week 8 | The CGI-C is a single-item, 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to their baseline state at the beginning of treatment, rated as: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; or 7 = very much worse. A higher score on the CGI-C represents a greater disease progression. |
| Change From Baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (Y-BOCS-BE) Score | Baseline, Week 8 | The Y-BOCS-BE is a clinician-rated scale that assesses obsession with binge eating thoughts and compulsiveness of binge eating behaviors. The Y-BOCS-BE is a 10-item scale, divided into 2 subscales with 5 items each: obsessions and compulsions. Each item is rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms) and total scores range from 0 to 40. A score of 0 to 7 is considered sub-clinical; 8 to 15 as mild; 16 to 23 as moderate; 24 to 31 as severe; and 32 to 40 as extreme obsession and compulsiveness of binge eating. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates. |
| Percentage of Participants With Four-Week Cessation From Binging | Week 8 | Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal point. |
| Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Episodes Per Week | Baseline, Weeks 7 to 8 | All binge eating episodes were recorded daily by the participant in a binge eating diary. At each visit, the investigator reviewed the completed diary and assessed the number of binges for each day. Number of binge episodes per week are reported. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates. |
| Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression - Severity (PGI-S) Score | Baseline, Week 8 | The PGI-S is a single-item self-report of the participant's severity of symptoms. Severity is rated on a 7-point scale: 1 = no symptoms; 2 = minimal; 3 = mild; 4 = moderate; 5 = marked; 6 = severe; 7 = very severe. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates. |
| Mean Patient Global Impression - Change (PGI-C) Score | Week 8 | The PGI-C is a single-item, self-report that requires the participant to assess how much his/her illness has improved or worsened relative to baseline and rate on a 7-point scale: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; or 7 = very much worse. A higher score indicates a greater disease progression. |
| Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores | Baseline, Week 8 | The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's health status and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, and vitality. The 8 domains are combined to form 2 component scores: PCS and MCS. PCS consisted of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. MCS consisted of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates. |
| Change From Baseline in Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire-7-Item Version (EDE-Q7) Total Score | Baseline, Week 8 | The EDE-Q7 is a self-report version of the eating disorder examination (EDE) and measures eating-disorder psychopathology in the past 28 days and over longer intervals. It comprises of 3 subscale scores (dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction). An EDE-Q global (total) score is calculated as average of 3 subscale scores and ranges from 0 (absence of the feature) to 6 (extreme degree). A higher score indicates a more severe outcome. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and trial center as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants took part in this study at investigational sites in the United States from 22 December 2021 to 19 August 2022.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg Participants received centanafadine 200 mg SR tablets, orally, BID at a TDD of 400 mg for 8 weeks. | 49 |
| Centanafadine 200 mg Participants received centanafadine 100 mg SR tablets, orally, BID at a TDD of 200 mg along with centanafadine matching placebo tablets, orally, BID for 8 weeks. | 49 |
| Placebo Participants received centanafadine matching placebo tablets, orally, BID for 8 weeks. | 49 |
| Total | 147 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Non-compliance with Study Drug | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Reason not Specified | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 6 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Centanafadine 400 mg | Total | Placebo | Centanafadine 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous Age | 42.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 | 43.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 | 45.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | 43.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 |
| Binge Eating Days Per Week | 4.43 binge eating days per week STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.21 | 4.5 binge eating days per week STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 | 4.56 binge eating days per week STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06 | 4.56 binge eating days per week STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.07 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino | 10 Participants | 18 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Ethnicity Not Hispanic or Latino | 39 Participants | 129 Participants | 45 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Ethnicity Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Asian | 2 Participants | 8 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Black or African American | 5 Participants | 25 Participants | 9 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Other | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White | 40 Participants | 109 Participants | 37 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Sex Female | 41 Participants | 123 Participants | 41 Participants | 41 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Sex Male | 8 Participants | 24 Participants | 8 Participants | 8 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 49 | 0 / 49 | 0 / 49 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 20 / 49 | 12 / 49 | 11 / 49 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 49 | 0 / 49 | 0 / 49 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per Week
Binge eating day was defined as a day with at least one binge eating episode. Least squares (LS) mean was determined by Mixed-effect Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method with change from baseline in binge eating days per week at scheduled visit as dependent variable and included fixed effect terms for treatment, trial center, visit week, and an interaction term of treatment by visit week.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 7 to 8
Population: Efficacy analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-randomization efficacy evaluation within the double-blind treatment period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per Week | -3.44 binge eating days per week | Standard Error 0.23 |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per Week | -3.07 binge eating days per week | Standard Error 0.23 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per Week | -3.01 binge eating days per week | Standard Error 0.23 |
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-administered global rating scale that measures disease severity on scale with a score range of 0 to 7 where, 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. A higher score on the CGI-S represents a higher severity of disease. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Population: Efficacy analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-randomization efficacy evaluation within the double-blind treatment period. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis. 'Number analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score | -2.15 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score | -1.43 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score | -1.61 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score
The HAM-A scale assesses both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). It consists of 14 items to rate the severity of symptoms of anxiety, each scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe. Total score was calculated as the sum of the 14 individual item scores, ranging from 0 to 56 and categorized as 0-13: normal range, 14-17: mild severity, 18-24: mild to moderate severity, 25-30: moderate to severe, and \>=31: severe. A higher score indicates a more severe anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score | -1.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.76 |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score | 0.55 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score | -1.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.22 |
Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
The MADRS is a diagnostic questionnaire used by clinician to assess the participant's severity of depression. The questionnaire includes questions on ten symptoms: Apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, difficulty concentrating, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Each question is scored on a range of 0 to 6 points and the total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores, ranging from 0 to 60 categorized as: 0 to 6: normal/symptoms absent, 7 to 19: mild depression, 20 to 34: moderate depression, and 35 to 60: severe depression. Higher scores indicate increased depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score | -0.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.15 |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score | 0.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.56 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score | -1.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.6 |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered an IMP and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AESIs were newly acquired skin eruptions that were non-traumatic which included eruptions such as skin rashes, skin irritations, skin reactions, or acneiform lesions. AEs related to abuse included: Feeling abnormal (floaty feeling in the head), euphoric mood (feeling high). MHIs included: IMP accounting errors, not involving suspected abuse nor diversion by participant; Non-compliance with trial procedures, not involving suspected abuse nor diversion by participant; and other cases involving neither suspected abuse nor diversion of trial IMP by participant.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)
Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | AEs | 34 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | AESIs Related to Rash | 5 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | AEs Related to Abuse | 2 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | AEs Involving MHIs | 2 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | AEs Involving MHIs | 2 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | AEs | 28 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | AEs Related to Abuse | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | AESIs Related to Rash | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | AEs Involving MHIs | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | AESIs Related to Rash | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | AEs Related to Abuse | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs) | AEs | 24 Participants |
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
12-lead ECG abnormality criteria included Rhythm: Supraventricular premature beat (not present at baseline and present post baseline); and Conduction: Primary (1°) atrioventricular block (PR ≥200 milliseconds \[msec\] and increase of ≥50 msec).
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)
Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | Supraventricular Premature Beat | 0 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | 1° Atrioventricular Block | 0 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | Supraventricular Premature Beat | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | 1° Atrioventricular Block | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | 1° Atrioventricular Block | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | Supraventricular Premature Beat | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities
Laboratory assessments included hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis. Abnormality criteria included: In milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) \[high bilirubin ≥2.0, low/high calcium ≤8.2/ ≥12, high cholesterol fasting ≥240, high glucose, fasting ≥100, high triglycerides, fasting ≥150, high urate ≥8.5 female / ≥10.5 male, high protein urine ≥2 units increase\]; high creatine kinase (units per liter \[U/L\]) \>3xupper limit of normal (ULN); high eosinophils/leukocytes ≥10%, low neutrophils/leukocytes ≤15%; In 10\^3/microliter (µL) \[low or high leukocytes ≤2.8x10\^9/L or ≥16.0x10\^9/L, low neutrophils ≤1.5x10\^9/L\]. The categories with at least one participant with clinically relevant value are reported here.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)
Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis. 'Number analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for analysis of specified parameter.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Creatine Kinase (U/L) | 2 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | Low Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%) | 3 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Urate: Males and Females (mg/dL) | 0 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Glucose, Fasting (mg/dL) | 7 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | Low Neutrophils (10^3/µL) | 8 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Triglycerides, Fasting (mg/dL) | 6 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | Low Calcium (mg/dL) | 0 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Protein, Urine (mg/dL) | 18 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | Low Leukocytes (10^3/µL) | 2 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL) | 8 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%) | 2 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Triglycerides, Fasting (mg/dL) | 9 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | Low Calcium (mg/dL) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL) | 6 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Creatine Kinase (U/L) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Glucose, Fasting (mg/dL) | 11 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Urate: Males and Females (mg/dL) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%) | 4 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | Low Leukocytes (10^3/µL) | 2 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | Low Neutrophils (10^3/µL) | 6 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | Low Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%) | 2 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Protein, Urine (mg/dL) | 15 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%) | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | Low Calcium (mg/dL) | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Protein, Urine (mg/dL) | 14 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | Low Leukocytes (10^3/µL) | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | Low Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%) | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Glucose, Fasting (mg/dL) | 8 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Triglycerides, Fasting (mg/dL) | 14 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Creatine Kinase (U/L) | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | Low Neutrophils (10^3/µL) | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL) | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities | High Urate: Males and Females (mg/dL) | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Vital sign measurements included heart rate in supine and standing positions (low: \<50 beats per minute \[bpm\] and decrease ≥10 bpm; High: \>100 bpm and increase ≥10 bpm), systolic blood pressure (BP) in supine and standing positions (low: \<90 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\] and decrease ≥20 mmHg; High: ≥140 mmHg and increase ≥20 mmHg), diastolic BP in supine and standing positions (low: \<60 mmHg and decrease ≥10 mmHg; High: ≥90 mmHg and increase ≥10 mmHg), weight in kilograms (kg) (low: ≥7% decrease; High: ≥7% increase), orthostatic hypotension, (≥30mmHg decrease is systolic BP or ≥20 mmHg in diastolic BP after at least 3 minutes of standing compared to the previous supine BP), and orthostatic tachycardia (≥25 bpm increase in heart rate from supine to standing). The categories with at least one participant with clinically relevant value are reported here.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)
Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Weight (kg) | 0 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Systolic BP Standing (mmHg) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Weight (kg) | 3 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Systolic BP Standing (mmHg) | 3 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Systolic BP Supine (mmHg) | 5 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg) | 10 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Orthostatic Hypotension (mmHg) | 2 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg) | 6 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Heart Rate Supine (bpm) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Heart Rate Supine (bpm) | 0 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Heart Rate Standing (bpm) | 6 Participants |
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Orthostatic Tachycardia (mmHg) | 8 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Weight (kg) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Heart Rate Supine (bpm) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Systolic BP Supine (mmHg) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg) | 2 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Heart Rate Standing (bpm) | 4 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Systolic BP Standing (mmHg) | 0 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Systolic BP Standing (mmHg) | 2 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg) | 3 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Weight (kg) | 1 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Orthostatic Hypotension (mmHg) | 3 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Orthostatic Tachycardia (mmHg) | 5 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Heart Rate Supine (bpm) | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Orthostatic Tachycardia (mmHg) | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Weight (kg) | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Heart Rate Standing (bpm) | 6 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg) | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Weight (kg) | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg) | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Heart Rate Supine (bpm) | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Orthostatic Hypotension (mmHg) | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Systolic BP Supine (mmHg) | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg) | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Systolic BP Standing (mmHg) | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Heart Rate Supine (bpm) | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | High Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg) | 6 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Low Systolic BP Standing (mmHg) | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Suicidality as Measured by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
The C-SSRS is a clinician-administered instrument that systematically assess suicidal ideation (SI) and suicidal behavior rating scale. It rates an individual's degree of SI on a scale, ranging from wish to be dead to active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent. The scale identifies SI severity and intensity, which may be indicative of an individual's intent to commit suicide. C-SSRS SI severity subscale ranges from 0 (no SI) to 5 (active SI with plan and intent). The scale identifies specific behaviors ranging from preparatory acts or behavior to suicide which may be indicative of an individual's intent to complete suicide. Suicidality was reported in this outcome measure, defined as at least 1 occurrence of suicidal ideation or at least 1 occurrence of suicidal behavior for each assessment period.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidality as Measured by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score | 0 Participants |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidality as Measured by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidality as Measured by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score | 0 Participants |
Study Medication Withdrawal Questionnaire (SMWQ) Total Mean Score
SMWQ is a questionnaire to assess withdrawal symptoms subsequent to completion of dosing with IMP. The SMWQ is a modification of the Amphetamine Withdrawal Questionnaire, in which in which the terms amphetamines and methamphetamine are replaced with the term the study medication. This change was intended to prevent bias by implying that the trial medication might be an amphetamine or amphetamine-like stimulant when presented with the survey. This questionnaire comprises of 13 items which describe symptoms associated with the cessation of study medication use for which participants indicate severity on a scale with scores ranging from 0 (no withdrawal symptoms) to 4 (most severe withdrawal symptom). The total score is calculated as the sum of all the scores for the 13 items, ranging from 0 to 52. Lower scores indicate less withdrawal symptoms.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Study Medication Withdrawal Questionnaire (SMWQ) Total Mean Score | 5.56 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Study Medication Withdrawal Questionnaire (SMWQ) Total Mean Score | 7.72 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.59 |
| Placebo | Study Medication Withdrawal Questionnaire (SMWQ) Total Mean Score | 6.40 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.47 |
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores
The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's health status and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, and vitality. The 8 domains are combined to form 2 component scores: PCS and MCS. PCS consisted of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. MCS consisted of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-administered global rating scale that measures disease severity on scale with a score range of 0 to 7 where, 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. A higher score on the CGI-S represents a higher severity of disease. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Change From Baseline in Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire-7-Item Version (EDE-Q7) Total Score
The EDE-Q7 is a self-report version of the eating disorder examination (EDE) and measures eating-disorder psychopathology in the past 28 days and over longer intervals. It comprises of 3 subscale scores (dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction). An EDE-Q global (total) score is calculated as average of 3 subscale scores and ranges from 0 (absence of the feature) to 6 (extreme degree). A higher score indicates a more severe outcome. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and trial center as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Episodes Per Week
All binge eating episodes were recorded daily by the participant in a binge eating diary. At each visit, the investigator reviewed the completed diary and assessed the number of binges for each day. Number of binge episodes per week are reported. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 7 to 8
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression - Severity (PGI-S) Score
The PGI-S is a single-item self-report of the participant's severity of symptoms. Severity is rated on a 7-point scale: 1 = no symptoms; 2 = minimal; 3 = mild; 4 = moderate; 5 = marked; 6 = severe; 7 = very severe. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (Y-BOCS-BE) Score
The Y-BOCS-BE is a clinician-rated scale that assesses obsession with binge eating thoughts and compulsiveness of binge eating behaviors. The Y-BOCS-BE is a 10-item scale, divided into 2 subscales with 5 items each: obsessions and compulsions. Each item is rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms) and total scores range from 0 to 40. A score of 0 to 7 is considered sub-clinical; 8 to 15 as mild; 16 to 23 as moderate; 24 to 31 as severe; and 32 to 40 as extreme obsession and compulsiveness of binge eating. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Mean Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Score
The CGI-C is a single-item, 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to their baseline state at the beginning of treatment, rated as: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; or 7 = very much worse. A higher score on the CGI-C represents a greater disease progression.
Time frame: Week 8
Mean Patient Global Impression - Change (PGI-C) Score
The PGI-C is a single-item, self-report that requires the participant to assess how much his/her illness has improved or worsened relative to baseline and rate on a 7-point scale: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; or 7 = very much worse. A higher score indicates a greater disease progression.
Time frame: Week 8
Percentage of Participants With Four-Week Cessation From Binging
Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal point.
Time frame: Week 8