Skip to content

A Trial of Centanafadine Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability in Adult Subjects With Binge Eating Disorder

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Centanafadine Sustained-release Tablets After Oral Administration in Adult Subjects With Binge Eating Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05113953
Enrollment
147
Registered
2021-11-09
Start date
2021-12-22
Completion date
2022-08-19
Last updated
2025-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Binge-Eating Disorder

Keywords

Centanafadine, Binge Eating Disorder

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of 2 doses of centanafadine sustained-release (SR) (200 milligrams \[mg\] and 400 mg total daily dose \[TDD\]) compared with placebo in adults with moderate to severe binge eating disorder (BED).

Interventions

Sustained-release oral tablets

DRUGPlacebo

Oral tablets

Sponsors

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Double blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult participants 18 to 65 years of age (inclusive) at the time of informed consent. * A primary diagnosis of BED, or is diagnosed at screening, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria and confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID). * BED with a history of at least 2 binge eating days per week for 6 months prior to screening. * A rating of 4 or higher on the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) at screening and baseline. * Body mass index (BMI) of 18 to 45 kg/m\^2, inclusive.

Exclusion criteria

* Lifetime history of bulimia nervosa or anorexia nervosa. * Participation in a formal weight loss program within 3 months of screening or planning to start a weight loss program during the trial. * History of bariatric surgery. * Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≥ 18.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per WeekBaseline, Weeks 7 to 8Binge eating day was defined as a day with at least one binge eating episode. Least squares (LS) mean was determined by Mixed-effect Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method with change from baseline in binge eating days per week at scheduled visit as dependent variable and included fixed effect terms for treatment, trial center, visit week, and an interaction term of treatment by visit week.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Suicidality as Measured by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ScoreWeek 8The C-SSRS is a clinician-administered instrument that systematically assess suicidal ideation (SI) and suicidal behavior rating scale. It rates an individual's degree of SI on a scale, ranging from wish to be dead to active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent. The scale identifies SI severity and intensity, which may be indicative of an individual's intent to commit suicide. C-SSRS SI severity subscale ranges from 0 (no SI) to 5 (active SI with plan and intent). The scale identifies specific behaviors ranging from preparatory acts or behavior to suicide which may be indicative of an individual's intent to complete suicide. Suicidality was reported in this outcome measure, defined as at least 1 occurrence of suicidal ideation or at least 1 occurrence of suicidal behavior for each assessment period.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreBaseline, Week 8The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-administered global rating scale that measures disease severity on scale with a score range of 0 to 7 where, 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. A higher score on the CGI-S represents a higher severity of disease. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered an IMP and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AESIs were newly acquired skin eruptions that were non-traumatic which included eruptions such as skin rashes, skin irritations, skin reactions, or acneiform lesions. AEs related to abuse included: Feeling abnormal (floaty feeling in the head), euphoric mood (feeling high). MHIs included: IMP accounting errors, not involving suspected abuse nor diversion by participant; Non-compliance with trial procedures, not involving suspected abuse nor diversion by participant; and other cases involving neither suspected abuse nor diversion of trial IMP by participant.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesFrom first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)Laboratory assessments included hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis. Abnormality criteria included: In milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) \[high bilirubin ≥2.0, low/high calcium ≤8.2/ ≥12, high cholesterol fasting ≥240, high glucose, fasting ≥100, high triglycerides, fasting ≥150, high urate ≥8.5 female / ≥10.5 male, high protein urine ≥2 units increase\]; high creatine kinase (units per liter \[U/L\]) \>3xupper limit of normal (ULN); high eosinophils/leukocytes ≥10%, low neutrophils/leukocytes ≤15%; In 10\^3/microliter (µL) \[low or high leukocytes ≤2.8x10\^9/L or ≥16.0x10\^9/L, low neutrophils ≤1.5x10\^9/L\]. The categories with at least one participant with clinically relevant value are reported here.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesFrom first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)Vital sign measurements included heart rate in supine and standing positions (low: \<50 beats per minute \[bpm\] and decrease ≥10 bpm; High: \>100 bpm and increase ≥10 bpm), systolic blood pressure (BP) in supine and standing positions (low: \<90 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\] and decrease ≥20 mmHg; High: ≥140 mmHg and increase ≥20 mmHg), diastolic BP in supine and standing positions (low: \<60 mmHg and decrease ≥10 mmHg; High: ≥90 mmHg and increase ≥10 mmHg), weight in kilograms (kg) (low: ≥7% decrease; High: ≥7% increase), orthostatic hypotension, (≥30mmHg decrease is systolic BP or ≥20 mmHg in diastolic BP after at least 3 minutes of standing compared to the previous supine BP), and orthostatic tachycardia (≥25 bpm increase in heart rate from supine to standing). The categories with at least one participant with clinically relevant value are reported here.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesFrom first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)12-lead ECG abnormality criteria included Rhythm: Supraventricular premature beat (not present at baseline and present post baseline); and Conduction: Primary (1°) atrioventricular block (PR ≥200 milliseconds \[msec\] and increase of ≥50 msec).
Study Medication Withdrawal Questionnaire (SMWQ) Total Mean ScoreWeek 8SMWQ is a questionnaire to assess withdrawal symptoms subsequent to completion of dosing with IMP. The SMWQ is a modification of the Amphetamine Withdrawal Questionnaire, in which in which the terms amphetamines and methamphetamine are replaced with the term the study medication. This change was intended to prevent bias by implying that the trial medication might be an amphetamine or amphetamine-like stimulant when presented with the survey. This questionnaire comprises of 13 items which describe symptoms associated with the cessation of study medication use for which participants indicate severity on a scale with scores ranging from 0 (no withdrawal symptoms) to 4 (most severe withdrawal symptom). The total score is calculated as the sum of all the scores for the 13 items, ranging from 0 to 52. Lower scores indicate less withdrawal symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 8The HAM-A scale assesses both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). It consists of 14 items to rate the severity of symptoms of anxiety, each scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe. Total score was calculated as the sum of the 14 individual item scores, ranging from 0 to 56 and categorized as 0-13: normal range, 14-17: mild severity, 18-24: mild to moderate severity, 25-30: moderate to severe, and \>=31: severe. A higher score indicates a more severe anxiety.
Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 8The MADRS is a diagnostic questionnaire used by clinician to assess the participant's severity of depression. The questionnaire includes questions on ten symptoms: Apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, difficulty concentrating, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Each question is scored on a range of 0 to 6 points and the total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores, ranging from 0 to 60 categorized as: 0 to 6: normal/symptoms absent, 7 to 19: mild depression, 20 to 34: moderate depression, and 35 to 60: severe depression. Higher scores indicate increased depressive symptoms.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-administered global rating scale that measures disease severity on scale with a score range of 0 to 7 where, 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. A higher score on the CGI-S represents a higher severity of disease. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Mean Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) ScoreWeek 8The CGI-C is a single-item, 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to their baseline state at the beginning of treatment, rated as: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; or 7 = very much worse. A higher score on the CGI-C represents a greater disease progression.
Change From Baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (Y-BOCS-BE) ScoreBaseline, Week 8The Y-BOCS-BE is a clinician-rated scale that assesses obsession with binge eating thoughts and compulsiveness of binge eating behaviors. The Y-BOCS-BE is a 10-item scale, divided into 2 subscales with 5 items each: obsessions and compulsions. Each item is rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms) and total scores range from 0 to 40. A score of 0 to 7 is considered sub-clinical; 8 to 15 as mild; 16 to 23 as moderate; 24 to 31 as severe; and 32 to 40 as extreme obsession and compulsiveness of binge eating. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Percentage of Participants With Four-Week Cessation From BingingWeek 8Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal point.
Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Episodes Per WeekBaseline, Weeks 7 to 8All binge eating episodes were recorded daily by the participant in a binge eating diary. At each visit, the investigator reviewed the completed diary and assessed the number of binges for each day. Number of binge episodes per week are reported. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression - Severity (PGI-S) ScoreBaseline, Week 8The PGI-S is a single-item self-report of the participant's severity of symptoms. Severity is rated on a 7-point scale: 1 = no symptoms; 2 = minimal; 3 = mild; 4 = moderate; 5 = marked; 6 = severe; 7 = very severe. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Mean Patient Global Impression - Change (PGI-C) ScoreWeek 8The PGI-C is a single-item, self-report that requires the participant to assess how much his/her illness has improved or worsened relative to baseline and rate on a 7-point scale: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; or 7 = very much worse. A higher score indicates a greater disease progression.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoresBaseline, Week 8The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's health status and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, and vitality. The 8 domains are combined to form 2 component scores: PCS and MCS. PCS consisted of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. MCS consisted of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Change From Baseline in Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire-7-Item Version (EDE-Q7) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 8The EDE-Q7 is a self-report version of the eating disorder examination (EDE) and measures eating-disorder psychopathology in the past 28 days and over longer intervals. It comprises of 3 subscale scores (dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction). An EDE-Q global (total) score is calculated as average of 3 subscale scores and ranges from 0 (absence of the feature) to 6 (extreme degree). A higher score indicates a more severe outcome. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and trial center as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in this study at investigational sites in the United States from 22 December 2021 to 19 August 2022.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Centanafadine 400 mg
Participants received centanafadine 200 mg SR tablets, orally, BID at a TDD of 400 mg for 8 weeks.
49
Centanafadine 200 mg
Participants received centanafadine 100 mg SR tablets, orally, BID at a TDD of 200 mg along with centanafadine matching placebo tablets, orally, BID for 8 weeks.
49
Placebo
Participants received centanafadine matching placebo tablets, orally, BID for 8 weeks.
49
Total147

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event503
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up342
Overall StudyNon-compliance with Study Drug100
Overall StudyReason not Specified200
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject264

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCentanafadine 400 mgTotalPlaceboCentanafadine 200 mg
Age, Continuous
Age
42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
45.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
43.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Binge Eating Days Per Week4.43 binge eating days per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.21
4.5 binge eating days per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
4.56 binge eating days per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06
4.56 binge eating days per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.07
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants18 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
39 Participants129 Participants45 Participants45 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
2 Participants8 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
5 Participants25 Participants9 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
40 Participants109 Participants37 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Sex
Female
41 Participants123 Participants41 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Sex
Male
8 Participants24 Participants8 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 490 / 490 / 49
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 4912 / 4911 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 490 / 490 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per Week

Binge eating day was defined as a day with at least one binge eating episode. Least squares (LS) mean was determined by Mixed-effect Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method with change from baseline in binge eating days per week at scheduled visit as dependent variable and included fixed effect terms for treatment, trial center, visit week, and an interaction term of treatment by visit week.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 7 to 8

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-randomization efficacy evaluation within the double-blind treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Centanafadine 400 mgChange From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per Week-3.44 binge eating days per weekStandard Error 0.23
Centanafadine 200 mgChange From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per Week-3.07 binge eating days per weekStandard Error 0.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per Week-3.01 binge eating days per weekStandard Error 0.23
p-value: 0.189395% CI: [-1.06, 0.21]MMRM
p-value: 0.850295% CI: [-0.69, 0.57]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-administered global rating scale that measures disease severity on scale with a score range of 0 to 7 where, 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. A higher score on the CGI-S represents a higher severity of disease. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-randomization efficacy evaluation within the double-blind treatment period. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis. 'Number analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Centanafadine 400 mgChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score-2.15 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Centanafadine 200 mgChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score-1.43 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score-1.61 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Comparison: Change from baseline at Week 8p-value: 0.031395% CI: [-1.02, -0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Change from baseline at Week 8p-value: 0.447195% CI: [-0.3, 0.67]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score

The HAM-A scale assesses both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). It consists of 14 items to rate the severity of symptoms of anxiety, each scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe. Total score was calculated as the sum of the 14 individual item scores, ranging from 0 to 56 and categorized as 0-13: normal range, 14-17: mild severity, 18-24: mild to moderate severity, 25-30: moderate to severe, and \>=31: severe. A higher score indicates a more severe anxiety.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Centanafadine 400 mgChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score-1.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.76
Centanafadine 200 mgChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score0.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score-1.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.22
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score

The MADRS is a diagnostic questionnaire used by clinician to assess the participant's severity of depression. The questionnaire includes questions on ten symptoms: Apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, difficulty concentrating, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Each question is scored on a range of 0 to 6 points and the total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores, ranging from 0 to 60 categorized as: 0 to 6: normal/symptoms absent, 7 to 19: mild depression, 20 to 34: moderate depression, and 35 to 60: severe depression. Higher scores indicate increased depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Centanafadine 400 mgChange From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score-0.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.15
Centanafadine 200 mgChange From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score-1.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered an IMP and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AESIs were newly acquired skin eruptions that were non-traumatic which included eruptions such as skin rashes, skin irritations, skin reactions, or acneiform lesions. AEs related to abuse included: Feeling abnormal (floaty feeling in the head), euphoric mood (feeling high). MHIs included: IMP accounting errors, not involving suspected abuse nor diversion by participant; Non-compliance with trial procedures, not involving suspected abuse nor diversion by participant; and other cases involving neither suspected abuse nor diversion of trial IMP by participant.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)

Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)AEs34 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)AESIs Related to Rash5 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)AEs Related to Abuse2 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)AEs Involving MHIs2 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)AEs Involving MHIs2 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)AEs28 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)AEs Related to Abuse1 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)AESIs Related to Rash3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)AEs Involving MHIs3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)AESIs Related to Rash1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)AEs Related to Abuse0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)AEs24 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

12-lead ECG abnormality criteria included Rhythm: Supraventricular premature beat (not present at baseline and present post baseline); and Conduction: Primary (1°) atrioventricular block (PR ≥200 milliseconds \[msec\] and increase of ≥50 msec).

Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)

Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesSupraventricular Premature Beat0 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities1° Atrioventricular Block0 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesSupraventricular Premature Beat1 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities1° Atrioventricular Block0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities1° Atrioventricular Block1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesSupraventricular Premature Beat0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities

Laboratory assessments included hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis. Abnormality criteria included: In milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) \[high bilirubin ≥2.0, low/high calcium ≤8.2/ ≥12, high cholesterol fasting ≥240, high glucose, fasting ≥100, high triglycerides, fasting ≥150, high urate ≥8.5 female / ≥10.5 male, high protein urine ≥2 units increase\]; high creatine kinase (units per liter \[U/L\]) \>3xupper limit of normal (ULN); high eosinophils/leukocytes ≥10%, low neutrophils/leukocytes ≤15%; In 10\^3/microliter (µL) \[low or high leukocytes ≤2.8x10\^9/L or ≥16.0x10\^9/L, low neutrophils ≤1.5x10\^9/L\]. The categories with at least one participant with clinically relevant value are reported here.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)

Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis. 'Number analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for analysis of specified parameter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Creatine Kinase (U/L)2 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%)3 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Urate: Males and Females (mg/dL)0 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Glucose, Fasting (mg/dL)7 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Neutrophils (10^3/µL)8 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Triglycerides, Fasting (mg/dL)6 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Calcium (mg/dL)0 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Protein, Urine (mg/dL)18 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Leukocytes (10^3/µL)2 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL)8 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Bilirubin (mg/dL)0 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%)2 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Triglycerides, Fasting (mg/dL)9 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Bilirubin (mg/dL)0 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Calcium (mg/dL)1 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL)6 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Creatine Kinase (U/L)1 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Glucose, Fasting (mg/dL)11 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Urate: Males and Females (mg/dL)1 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%)4 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Leukocytes (10^3/µL)2 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Neutrophils (10^3/µL)6 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%)2 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Protein, Urine (mg/dL)15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%)3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Calcium (mg/dL)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Protein, Urine (mg/dL)14 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Leukocytes (10^3/µL)2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Bilirubin (mg/dL)1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%)2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Glucose, Fasting (mg/dL)8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Triglycerides, Fasting (mg/dL)14 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Creatine Kinase (U/L)1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Neutrophils (10^3/µL)3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Cholesterol, Fasting (mg/dL)4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Urate: Males and Females (mg/dL)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities

Vital sign measurements included heart rate in supine and standing positions (low: \<50 beats per minute \[bpm\] and decrease ≥10 bpm; High: \>100 bpm and increase ≥10 bpm), systolic blood pressure (BP) in supine and standing positions (low: \<90 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\] and decrease ≥20 mmHg; High: ≥140 mmHg and increase ≥20 mmHg), diastolic BP in supine and standing positions (low: \<60 mmHg and decrease ≥10 mmHg; High: ≥90 mmHg and increase ≥10 mmHg), weight in kilograms (kg) (low: ≥7% decrease; High: ≥7% increase), orthostatic hypotension, (≥30mmHg decrease is systolic BP or ≥20 mmHg in diastolic BP after at least 3 minutes of standing compared to the previous supine BP), and orthostatic tachycardia (≥25 bpm increase in heart rate from supine to standing). The categories with at least one participant with clinically relevant value are reported here.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)

Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Weight (kg)0 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Systolic BP Standing (mmHg)1 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg)1 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Weight (kg)3 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Systolic BP Standing (mmHg)3 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Systolic BP Supine (mmHg)5 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg)10 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg)1 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension (mmHg)2 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg)6 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Heart Rate Supine (bpm)1 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Heart Rate Supine (bpm)0 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Heart Rate Standing (bpm)6 Participants
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Tachycardia (mmHg)8 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Weight (kg)1 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Heart Rate Supine (bpm)1 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Systolic BP Supine (mmHg)1 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg)2 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg)1 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Heart Rate Standing (bpm)4 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Systolic BP Standing (mmHg)0 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Systolic BP Standing (mmHg)2 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg)1 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg)3 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Weight (kg)1 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension (mmHg)3 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Tachycardia (mmHg)5 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Heart Rate Supine (bpm)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Tachycardia (mmHg)4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Weight (kg)1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Heart Rate Standing (bpm)6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg)3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Weight (kg)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Heart Rate Supine (bpm)3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesOrthostatic Hypotension (mmHg)1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Systolic BP Supine (mmHg)3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Systolic BP Standing (mmHg)4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Heart Rate Supine (bpm)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHigh Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg)6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesLow Systolic BP Standing (mmHg)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Suicidality as Measured by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score

The C-SSRS is a clinician-administered instrument that systematically assess suicidal ideation (SI) and suicidal behavior rating scale. It rates an individual's degree of SI on a scale, ranging from wish to be dead to active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent. The scale identifies SI severity and intensity, which may be indicative of an individual's intent to commit suicide. C-SSRS SI severity subscale ranges from 0 (no SI) to 5 (active SI with plan and intent). The scale identifies specific behaviors ranging from preparatory acts or behavior to suicide which may be indicative of an individual's intent to complete suicide. Suicidality was reported in this outcome measure, defined as at least 1 occurrence of suicidal ideation or at least 1 occurrence of suicidal behavior for each assessment period.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Centanafadine 400 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidality as Measured by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score0 Participants
Centanafadine 200 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidality as Measured by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidality as Measured by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score0 Participants
Secondary

Study Medication Withdrawal Questionnaire (SMWQ) Total Mean Score

SMWQ is a questionnaire to assess withdrawal symptoms subsequent to completion of dosing with IMP. The SMWQ is a modification of the Amphetamine Withdrawal Questionnaire, in which in which the terms amphetamines and methamphetamine are replaced with the term the study medication. This change was intended to prevent bias by implying that the trial medication might be an amphetamine or amphetamine-like stimulant when presented with the survey. This questionnaire comprises of 13 items which describe symptoms associated with the cessation of study medication use for which participants indicate severity on a scale with scores ranging from 0 (no withdrawal symptoms) to 4 (most severe withdrawal symptom). The total score is calculated as the sum of all the scores for the 13 items, ranging from 0 to 52. Lower scores indicate less withdrawal symptoms.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: Safety analysis set included all the randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' is the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Centanafadine 400 mgStudy Medication Withdrawal Questionnaire (SMWQ) Total Mean Score5.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Centanafadine 200 mgStudy Medication Withdrawal Questionnaire (SMWQ) Total Mean Score7.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.59
PlaceboStudy Medication Withdrawal Questionnaire (SMWQ) Total Mean Score6.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.47
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores

The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's health status and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, and vitality. The 8 domains are combined to form 2 component scores: PCS and MCS. PCS consisted of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. MCS consisted of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-administered global rating scale that measures disease severity on scale with a score range of 0 to 7 where, 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. A higher score on the CGI-S represents a higher severity of disease. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6

Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire-7-Item Version (EDE-Q7) Total Score

The EDE-Q7 is a self-report version of the eating disorder examination (EDE) and measures eating-disorder psychopathology in the past 28 days and over longer intervals. It comprises of 3 subscale scores (dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction). An EDE-Q global (total) score is calculated as average of 3 subscale scores and ranges from 0 (absence of the feature) to 6 (extreme degree). A higher score indicates a more severe outcome. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA model with treatment and trial center as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Episodes Per Week

All binge eating episodes were recorded daily by the participant in a binge eating diary. At each visit, the investigator reviewed the completed diary and assessed the number of binges for each day. Number of binge episodes per week are reported. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 7 to 8

Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression - Severity (PGI-S) Score

The PGI-S is a single-item self-report of the participant's severity of symptoms. Severity is rated on a 7-point scale: 1 = no symptoms; 2 = minimal; 3 = mild; 4 = moderate; 5 = marked; 6 = severe; 7 = very severe. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Modified for Binge Eating (Y-BOCS-BE) Score

The Y-BOCS-BE is a clinician-rated scale that assesses obsession with binge eating thoughts and compulsiveness of binge eating behaviors. The Y-BOCS-BE is a 10-item scale, divided into 2 subscales with 5 items each: obsessions and compulsions. Each item is rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms) and total scores range from 0 to 40. A score of 0 to 7 is considered sub-clinical; 8 to 15 as mild; 16 to 23 as moderate; 24 to 31 as severe; and 32 to 40 as extreme obsession and compulsiveness of binge eating. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Other Pre-specified

Mean Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Score

The CGI-C is a single-item, 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to their baseline state at the beginning of treatment, rated as: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; or 7 = very much worse. A higher score on the CGI-C represents a greater disease progression.

Time frame: Week 8

Other Pre-specified

Mean Patient Global Impression - Change (PGI-C) Score

The PGI-C is a single-item, self-report that requires the participant to assess how much his/her illness has improved or worsened relative to baseline and rate on a 7-point scale: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; or 7 = very much worse. A higher score indicates a greater disease progression.

Time frame: Week 8

Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Four-Week Cessation From Binging

Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal point.

Time frame: Week 8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026