Skip to content

Smokeless Tobacco Cessation Intervention for Firefighters

Development of a M-Health Smokeless Tobacco Cessation Intervention for Firefighters

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05111041
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-11-08
Start date
2022-01-25
Completion date
2024-01-10
Last updated
2024-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Smokeless Tobacco Cessation

Keywords

Firefighters, Smokeless Tobacco, Quitting Smokeless Tobacco, First Responders

Brief summary

The investigators are asking professional firefighters across North Carolina to take part in focus groups to discuss the specific needs of firefighters in smokeless tobacco cessation. About 40 firefighters will take part in the focus groups. The purpose of the focus groups is to learn how firefighting and shift work impact smokeless tobacco use and risk perceptions related to chew or dip. Using their feedback, the study team will then develop a cessation program specifically geared towards firefighters and first responders. The cessation program will be a mobile text / chat intervention specifically tailored to needs of firefighters and first responders who wish to stop using smokeless tobacco. About 50 firefighters and first responders will take part in this program, while being randomized into either the intervention group or the control group.

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL#EnufSnuff.TXT- First Responder

Participants in this intervention will be given the choice of following the Gradual Reduction to Quit program or to choose their own quit date within 2-4 weeks. The Gradual Reduction to Quit program will reduce smokeless tobacco use via text message support and weekly prompts guiding the participants to gradually decrease their use of smokeless tobacco until they are down to zero. A four week Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) sample in the form of lozenges will also be provided to all participants. The intent of this program is to reduce the number of times participants use smokeless tobacco.

Participants will be sent the Enuf Snuff cessation manual, support text messages, as well as a four week Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) sample in the form of lozenges.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Professional firefighters or first responders * 18 years or older * Have used smokeless tobacco for the past year and current (past 30 days) smokeless tobacco daily use * Access to a smartphone

Exclusion criteria

* Not a professional firefighter or first responder * Under 18 years of age * Have not used smokeless tobacco for the past year and are not current (past 30 days) smokeless tobacco daily use * No access to a smartphone

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First Responders Who Met the Study Eligibility Criteria, Were Enrolled, and Randomized to a Treatment ArmWithin 3 months of the initiation of study recruitment
Number of First Responders Recruited Who Completed a Screening AssessmentWithin 3 months of the initiation of study recruitment
Percent of Participants Engaged With the Program as Measured by Completion of the End of Program Questionnaire30 days following the end of the 10-week interventionStudy engagement defined as completing the End of Intervention Program assessment.
Number of Participants Who Stated Intervention Was Useful as Measured by Questionnaire30 days following the end of the 10-week interventionUsefulness was measured on a scale of 1-5, where 1=Not at all useful, 2=Somewhat useful, 3=Undecided, 4=Very useful, 5=Extremely useful. Ratings were dichotomized for the analysis as 0=no (not at all, somewhat, undecided) or 1=yes (very, extremely useful).
Number of Participants Who Stated That #EnufSnuff.TXT Intervention Was Helpful as Measured by Questionnaire30 days following the end of the 10-week interventionHelpfulness was measured on a scale of 1-5 where 1=not at all, 2=somewhat, 3=Undecided, 4=very, 5=extremely. Ratings were dichotomized for the analysis as 0=no (not at all, somewhat, undecided) and 1=yes (very, extremely).
Number of Participants Who Stated Intervention Made Them Consider Quitting as Measured by Questionnaire30 days following the end of the 10-week interventionConsidered quitting was measured on a scale of 1-5, where 1=Not at all useful, 2=Somewhat useful, 3=Undecided, 4=Very useful, 5=Extremely useful. Ratings were dichotomized for the analysis as 0=no (not at all, somewhat, undecided) or 1=yes (very, extremely useful).
Number of Participants Who Stated They Would Recommend Program to a Friend as Measured by Questionnaire30 days following the end of the 10-week interventionRecommend to friend was measured on a scale of 1-5, where 1=Not at all useful, 2=Somewhat useful, 3=Undecided, 4=Very useful, 5=Extremely useful. Ratings were then dichotomized for the analysis as 0=no (not at all, somewhat, undecided) or 1=yes (very, extremely useful).
Number of Participants Who Quit Smokeless Tobacco Measured by Self Report30 days following the end of the 10-week interventionQuit was determined by the self-report response (yes or no) to the question, In the past 7 days, have you used any dip?

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All participants were recruited using social media (i.e., Facebook). An advertising profile for the study targeted the study population (e.g., current smokeless tobacco users (chewer/dipper), at or over age 18, currently working or volunteering as a firefighter or first responder, with access to a smartphone). This was a single-site study, which used electronic consents and survey measures.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were required to verify their age, location, and smokeless tobacco use when submitting their information via the advertisement. During the electronic screener survey, participants were required to verify their age, first responder status, and use of smokeless tobacco as well. If any answers were outside of the eligibility requirements, they were directed to an ineligibility notification screen in the RedCap system. Those deemed eligible proceeded to the Baseline survey.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
#EnufSnuff.TXT- First Responder
Participants in this group will receive a mobile gradual smokeless tobacco reduction intervention and support text messages. #EnufSnuff.TXT- First Responder: Participants in this intervention will be given the choice of following the Gradual Reduction to Quit program or to choose their own quit date within 2-4 weeks. The Gradual Reduction to Quit program will reduce smokeless tobacco use via text message support and weekly prompts guiding the participants to gradually decrease their use of smokeless tobacco until they are down to zero. A four week Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) sample in the form of lozenges will also be provided to all participants. The intent of this program is to reduce the number of times participants use smokeless tobacco.
30
Enough Snuff Intervention
Participants in this group will receive tobacco cessation materials and support text messages. Enough Snuff Intervention: Participants will be sent the Enuf Snuff cessation manual, support text messages, as well as a four week Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) sample in the form of lozenges.
30
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up67
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic#EnufSnuff.TXT- First ResponderTotalEnough Snuff Intervention
Age, Continuous37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
37.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
30 Participants59 Participants29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
28 Participants57 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 Participants60 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants59 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

First Responders Who Met the Study Eligibility Criteria, Were Enrolled, and Randomized to a Treatment Arm

Time frame: Within 3 months of the initiation of study recruitment

Population: First responders who met the study eligibility criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recruited First RespondersFirst Responders Who Met the Study Eligibility Criteria, Were Enrolled, and Randomized to a Treatment Arm30 Participants
Enough Snuff InterventionFirst Responders Who Met the Study Eligibility Criteria, Were Enrolled, and Randomized to a Treatment Arm30 Participants
Primary

Number of First Responders Recruited Who Completed a Screening Assessment

Time frame: Within 3 months of the initiation of study recruitment

Population: First responders recruited and screened for the study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recruited First RespondersNumber of First Responders Recruited Who Completed a Screening Assessment163 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Quit Smokeless Tobacco Measured by Self Report

Quit was determined by the self-report response (yes or no) to the question, In the past 7 days, have you used any dip?

Time frame: 30 days following the end of the 10-week intervention

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recruited First RespondersNumber of Participants Who Quit Smokeless Tobacco Measured by Self Report12 Participants
Enough Snuff InterventionNumber of Participants Who Quit Smokeless Tobacco Measured by Self Report10 Participants
p-value: 0.592595% CI: [0.465, 3.823]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Number of Participants Who Stated Intervention Made Them Consider Quitting as Measured by Questionnaire

Considered quitting was measured on a scale of 1-5, where 1=Not at all useful, 2=Somewhat useful, 3=Undecided, 4=Very useful, 5=Extremely useful. Ratings were dichotomized for the analysis as 0=no (not at all, somewhat, undecided) or 1=yes (very, extremely useful).

Time frame: 30 days following the end of the 10-week intervention

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recruited First RespondersNumber of Participants Who Stated Intervention Made Them Consider Quitting as Measured by Questionnaire16 Participants
Enough Snuff InterventionNumber of Participants Who Stated Intervention Made Them Consider Quitting as Measured by Questionnaire14 Participants
p-value: 0.605895% CI: [0.474, 3.602]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Number of Participants Who Stated Intervention Was Useful as Measured by Questionnaire

Usefulness was measured on a scale of 1-5, where 1=Not at all useful, 2=Somewhat useful, 3=Undecided, 4=Very useful, 5=Extremely useful. Ratings were dichotomized for the analysis as 0=no (not at all, somewhat, undecided) or 1=yes (very, extremely useful).

Time frame: 30 days following the end of the 10-week intervention

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recruited First RespondersNumber of Participants Who Stated Intervention Was Useful as Measured by Questionnaire5 Participants
Enough Snuff InterventionNumber of Participants Who Stated Intervention Was Useful as Measured by Questionnaire6 Participants
p-value: 0.738995% CI: [0.215, 2.972]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Number of Participants Who Stated That #EnufSnuff.TXT Intervention Was Helpful as Measured by Questionnaire

Helpfulness was measured on a scale of 1-5 where 1=not at all, 2=somewhat, 3=Undecided, 4=very, 5=extremely. Ratings were dichotomized for the analysis as 0=no (not at all, somewhat, undecided) and 1=yes (very, extremely).

Time frame: 30 days following the end of the 10-week intervention

Population: Not relevant to the Enough Snuff Intervention arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recruited First RespondersNumber of Participants Who Stated That #EnufSnuff.TXT Intervention Was Helpful as Measured by Questionnaire9 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Stated They Would Recommend Program to a Friend as Measured by Questionnaire

Recommend to friend was measured on a scale of 1-5, where 1=Not at all useful, 2=Somewhat useful, 3=Undecided, 4=Very useful, 5=Extremely useful. Ratings were then dichotomized for the analysis as 0=no (not at all, somewhat, undecided) or 1=yes (very, extremely useful).

Time frame: 30 days following the end of the 10-week intervention

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recruited First RespondersNumber of Participants Who Stated They Would Recommend Program to a Friend as Measured by Questionnaire11 Participants
Enough Snuff InterventionNumber of Participants Who Stated They Would Recommend Program to a Friend as Measured by Questionnaire11 Participants
95% CI: [0.349, 2.866]
Primary

Percent of Participants Engaged With the Program as Measured by Completion of the End of Program Questionnaire

Study engagement defined as completing the End of Intervention Program assessment.

Time frame: 30 days following the end of the 10-week intervention

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recruited First RespondersPercent of Participants Engaged With the Program as Measured by Completion of the End of Program Questionnaire23 Participants
Enough Snuff InterventionPercent of Participants Engaged With the Program as Measured by Completion of the End of Program Questionnaire23 Participants
p-value: 195% CI: [0.302, 3.309]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026