Skip to content

The Prognostic Role of Lymph Node Dissection In Men With Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial To Evaluate The Prognostic Role of Lymph Node Dissection In Men With Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05109910
Enrollment
284
Registered
2021-11-05
Start date
2021-11-17
Completion date
2027-11-30
Last updated
2021-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Prostate Cancer, Lymph node dissection, Prostatectomy

Brief summary

An extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is the most accurate staging method to assess the presence of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The therapeutic value, however remains unclear. Prospective randomized trials to address this void are lacking. Since in intermediate and a proportion of high risk PCa the risk of nodal metastases is generally below 25%, the vast majority of men undergo a procedure that has no oncological benefit, but is not without toxicity. Therefore, the investigators aim to compare the oncologic outcomes of intermediate- and high-risk PCa patients with an estimated risk of lymph node invasion of 5-20% undergoing a radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without an ePLND.

Detailed description

The role of an extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial. An ePLND is the most accurate staging method to assess the presence of lymph node metastases. Lymph node involvement is associated with a significantly worse prognosis and may require immediate or delayed adjuvant therapy. However, an ePLND is associated with an increased risk of complications such as lymphoceles, thromboses and lymphedema, and prolongs surgery and patient recovery. Thus, the diagnostic advantage of PLND should be weighed against the potential morbidity. The therapeutic value of an ePLND remains especially unclear in PCa patients with an estimated risk of lymph node invasion (LNI) ≤ 20%, where only a minority of patients will have nodes harbouring metastases. Prospective trials to address this issue are still lacking.

Interventions

Bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection

Sponsors

The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male, aged ≥ 18 years * Prostate cancer patients with a Briganti calculated risk of LN metastases of 5-20% without evidence of metastases on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT requiring an ePLND in the standard treatment * Scheduled for a (robot-assisted) laparoscopic radical prostatectomy * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) classification \> 3 * Patients with a contradiction for a lymphadenectomy * Neoadjuvant hormone deprivation therapy * Absence or withdrawal of an informed consent * Evidence of metastases on pre-operative PSMA PET/CT

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Persistent PSA rate6 months after surgeryPersistent PSA is defined as a PSA value ≥ 0.1 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Metastasis-free survival3 years after surgeryThis is defined as the time between radical prostatectomy to development of metastasis
Incidence of complications after surgery3 and 6 months after surgeryAccording to Clavien-Dindo classification
Incidence of salvage therapy after primary surgery3 years after surgeryI.e., androgen deprivation therapy, radiation therapy or salvage lymph node dissection
Global Quality of life after surgery6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgeryQuality of life (QoL) will be assessed with the EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire's (QLQ-C30) global QoL scale ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better QoL
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate3 years after surgeryBCR is defined as a PSA value ≥ 0.2 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy
Urinary continence after surgery6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgeryUrinary continence will be assessed with the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) questionnaire, ranging from 0 (best) to 21 (worst)
Urinary voiding symptoms6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgeryUrinary voiding symptoms will be assessed with the International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS), ranging from 0 (best) to 35 (worst)
Potency after surgery6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgeryPotency will be assessed with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. The IIEF classifies the severity of erectile dysfunction into five categories stratified by score: No erectile dysfunction. Score: 26-30 Mild erectile dysfunction. Score: 22-25 Mild to moderate erectile dysfunction. Score: 17-21 Moderate erectile dysfunction. Score: 11-16 Severe erectile dysfunction. Score: 6-10.
Health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgeryHealth-related quality of life in prostate cancer patients will be assessed with the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Prostate Cancer Module (QLQ-PR25) with a scale ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicate either more symptoms (urinary, bowel, hormonal treatment-related symptoms) or higher levels of (sexual) activity or functioning

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactHenk G van der Poel, Prof
h.vd.poel@nki.nl0205129111
Backup ContactHilda A de Barros, MD
h.d.barros@nki.nl0205129111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026