Skip to content

A Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Benefits of CrossFit in People Who Work Predominantly in a Sedentary Manner.

MedXFit Intervention for Predominantly Seated People

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05109286
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-11-05
Start date
2020-10-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2022-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

People With Predominantly Sedentary Work

Brief summary

People who predominantly sit down often suffer from spinal complaints. This is mainly caused or intensified by a lack of exercise and a shortened posterior muscle chain. This study aims to investigate whether CrossFit can improve physical deficits, reduce pain, and improve quality of life. For this purpose, 30 test persons should take part in regular CrossFit training twice a week over one year. In addition, as a control group, 30 persons are also observed who exercise according to their ideas.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCrossFit

CrossFit training

Sponsors

CrossFit Kokoro
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Bundeswehr University Munich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Predominantly sedentary work * Willingness to participate in CrossFit training

Exclusion criteria

* Medical reasons against participating in regular exercise * Acute severe injuries to the musculoskeletal system (e.g. broken bones, torn tendons)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mobility1 yearChanges in the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) according to Cook G. et al.; Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2014. FMS has a range from 0 -21 (0 = worst, 21 = best).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Strength Symmetry1 yearStrength was assessed in kg using the Dr. WOLFF BackCheck® 617 (BC). The BC allows to measure maximum isometric strength. Furthermore, it provides reference data to evaluate strength and strength symmetry values on a scale ranging from 0 - 10 (0 = worst, 10 = best)
Strength1 yearStrength was assessed in kg using the Dr. WOLFF BackCheck® 617 (BC).
Subjective Well-Being1 yearSubjective Well-Being was measured with the World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5). WHO-5 has a range from 0 -25 (0 = worst, 25 = best).

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026