Skip to content

Efficacy of a Novel CCH Protocol for PD Among Prior Non-responders

Efficacy of a Novel Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum Protocol for Peyronie's Disease Among Prior Non-responders: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blinded Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05108558
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-11-05
Start date
2021-09-20
Completion date
2026-06-13
Last updated
2026-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peyronie's Disease

Brief summary

Compare key clinical outcomes between controls and men treated with a novel CCH administration protocol among men previously unresponsive to CCH administration.

Detailed description

Beginning approximately 3 years ago, the investigators' team sought to achieve further improvements with CCH through the addition of more aggressive modeling therapies. Results from a comparison of CCH alone vs CCH and traction with RestoreX demonstrated a mean 33.8 degree (49%) curvature improvement with combined therapy compared to 19-20 degrees (30-31%) with CCH alone or CCH and other traction devices). These results currently represent the greatest improvements with CCH in published literature and further build upon phase IIb results which demonstrated that mechanical traction (via manual modeling in the phase IIb trial) represents a critical factor in achieving improvements with CCH. The investigators' team additionally published a survey of men who had experienced suspected penile fractures with CCH and demonstrated greater curvature improvements without any loss / worsening of erectile function. This critical study highlighted that conservative management of suspected fractures should not only be considered a standard of care in managing suspected fractures, but also that these men achieved better final outcomes (again highlighting the importance of the combination of mechanical curvature correction in addition to CCH management). Based on the above findings, the investigators' team began performing a more aggressive manual modeling protocol. This novel protocol included several notable innovations: dilution of the 0.9 mg of CCH in 0.7 ml of diluent, injection to the erect penis to assure accurate injection, repeat curvature assessments with each series (due to changing of the point of maximal curvature), incorporation of RestoreX traction therapy post injection, and 'aggressive' manual modeling (equivalent of 10-15 lbs of force) to achieve curvature correction. Preliminary (unpublished - abstract submitted to SMSNA 2021) results from these men demonstrated a median \ 60% curvature improvement. Importantly, several of the patients had previously undergone 8 CCH injections with outside providers and were able to similarly achieve a median 60% improvement with the investigators' injection / modeling protocol. These preliminary findings have several important ramifications for the treatment of PD: 1. Men who have previously not achieved adequate curvature correction with 4 series of CCH injections may benefit from additional injections using a more aggressive traction protocol. 2. A more aggressive traction protocol would benefit patients to achieve greater outcomes than with previously reported protocols. 1.2 Investigational Treatments The current study would randomize men 1:3 into one of two treatment cohorts: 1. Observation followed by CCH or 2. CCH followed by observation. This study design offers the benefits of a randomized, controlled trial (highest level of evidence). RCTs are particularly important in PD, where the disease changes over time in a percentage of men as a function of its natural history. This would also allow blinding of measurements using photographs (single-blinded assessments), which provides further study rigor. 1. No treatment (control) followed by CCH. Men in this cohort would undergo baseline assessments followed by no treatment for 6 months and then repeat assessments. Men would then cross-over to CCH treatment and undergo up to 8 injections (or until curvature is \<15 degrees). Interval assessments would be performed with the 1st injection of each series, and final assessments would then be performed 6 weeks following the final injection. 2. CCH followed by no treatment. Men in this cohort would undergo baseline assessments followed by up to 8 injections of CCH (or until curvature is \<15 degrees). Interval assessments would be performed with the 1st injection of each series and 6 weeks following completion of treatment. Men then would not undergo any additional treatments for 6 months, after which final assessments would then performed.

Interventions

DRUGCCH administration

Patients will be randomized 3:1 into the CCH administration arm. After undergoing baseline assessments, this arm will receive up to 8 CCH injections, followed by final assessments 6 weeks later.

DRUGControl - Crossover to CCH

Patients will be randomized 1:3 into the control arm. After undergoing baseline assessments, control men will not undergo treatments for 6 months. They will then have repeat assessments and receive up to 8 CCH injections. They will then have final assessments performed 6 weeks after treatment.

DEVICERestoreX

Both treatment arms will incorporate the use of RestoreX for 30-60 minutes daily during CCH administration and continued until 6 weeks after final injection administration.

Sponsors

Charitable Union for the Research and Education of Peyronie's Disease
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Photography will be obtained where possible, with outcomes assessed based on the photographs. The care provider obtaining measurements will also be blinded as to baseline outcomes and results with follow-up assessments.

Intervention model description

Patients meeting criteria who have consented will be randomized to either control or CCH x 6 months, followed by a cross-over phase where controls will receive CCH. See Figure 1 for full study schema. 1. Control. Men in this cohort would undergo baseline assessments followed by no treatment for 6 months and then repeat assessments. Men would then cross-over to the CCH treatment phase and undergo up to 8 injections (or until curvature is \<15 degrees, whichever comes first). Final assessments would then be performed 6 weeks following the final injection. 2. CCH followed by observation. Men in this cohort would undergo baseline assessments followed by up to 8 injections of CCH (or until curvature is \<15 degrees). Assessments would then be performed 6 weeks after completion of treatment. Men then would not undergo any additional treatments for 6 months, after which they would have final assessments performed.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men with Peyronie's Disease * \>18 years old * Curvature ≥30 degrees * Previously completed 6-8 CCH injections * Prior minimal (\<20% and/or \<10 degrees) responsiveness to CCH administration * Prior CCH injections must have been performed without use of a Restorex traction device and used the IMPRESS protocol * Ability to achieve an erection satisfactory for intercourse with or without PDE5 inhibitors * The patient exhibits a palpable plaque consistent with Peyronie's Disease

Exclusion criteria

* Prior surgical treatment on the penis (other than circumcision) * Any contraindications to CCH - as determined by the PI * Inability to complete 8 additional CCH injections * Severe plaque calcification (i.e. \>1 cm shadowing)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Penile Curvature6 monthsCompare the change in degree of penile curvature from baseline (using a goniometer) between control and treatment groups at 6 months
Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire Outcomes6 monthsCompare Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire outcomes between control and treatment groups at 6 months using the Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire (15 items; subdomains - psychological and physical (Q1-6, 0-24), penile pain (Q7-9; 0-30), symptom bother (Q10-15; 0-16); 12 and 14 (Y/N q's); lower is better.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Index of Erectile Function Outcomes6 monthsCompare International Index of Erectile Function Outcomes between control and treatment groups at 6 months
Penile Curvature Compared to Baseline12 monthsCompare penile curvature changes (degrees) in control men at baseline and 12 months (i.e. prior to and following cross-over to CCH) - using goniometer
Penile Length Compared to Baseline12 monthsCompare penile length changes in control men at baseline and 12 months (i.e. prior to and following cross-over to CCH)
Compare Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire to Baseline12 monthsCompare PDQ changes in control men at baseline and 12 months (i.e. prior to and following cross-over to CCH) using the Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire (15 items; subdomains - psychological and physical (Q1-6, 0-24), penile pain (Q7-9; 0-30), symptom bother (Q10-15; 0-16); 12 and 14 (Y/N q's); lower is better.
Compare International Index of Erectile Function to baseline12 monthsCompare International Index of Erectile Function changes in control men at baseline and 12 months (i.e. prior to and following cross-over to CCH)
Penile Length Between Groups6 monthsCompare penile length changes between control and treatment groups at 6 months
Adverse events - 6 months - pain, sensation, swelling6 monthsReport adverse events at the 6-month time point
Adverse events - 12 months - pain, sensation, swelling12 monthsReport adverse events at the 12-month time point
Change in penile curvature durability6 monthsReport changes in penile curvature degree between the 6 and 12-month assessments for CCH men by goniometer.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLandon Trost, MD

CURE PD

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 27, 2026