Esophageal Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Minimally invasive surgery
Brief summary
We previously developed a novel non-trans thoracic esophagectomy, the single-port inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with laparoscopy for the radical esophagectomy of esophageal cancer.This study is evaluating the feasibility and safety of radical resection of single-port inflatable mediastinal mirror synchronization with laparoscopic esophageal carcinoma, as well as the clinical value of the radical resection of single-port inflatable mediastinal mirror synchronization with laparoscopic esophageal carcinoma as a new minimally invasive operation for esophageal carcinoma.
Detailed description
To reduce postoperative pulmonary complications, considerable efforts have been made to develop the nontransthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. For instance, esophageal stripping and transhiatal esophagectomy are the nontransthoracic operations developed for treatment for esophageal cancer. These methods possess several advantages, including non-thoracotomy, less postoperative pain, less postoperative cardiac and pulmonary complications, and safer for elderly patients. However, these two methods are limited with the poor surgical view, poor mediastinal lymph node dissection (especially upper mediastinal lymph nodes), and high risk of bleeding. In 2015 and 2016, Prof. Fujiwara has developed novel surgical methods on the dissection of upper mediastinal lymph nodes using single-port mediastinoscopy through the cervical incision and the lower mediastinal lymph nodes (including the subcarinal lymph nodes) by laparoscopy, respectively.For the first time, non-transthoracic radical resection of esophageal cancer could be achieved along with the dissection of all the mediastinal lymph nodes. Based on the Fujiwara's method, we further improved this surgical method to thesingle-port inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with laparoscopy for the radical treatment of esophageal cancerand has successfully performed this novel surgical method for the first case in March 2016. We have completed over 200 cases of radical resection of esophageal carcinoma using this novel surgical technique from May 2016 to August 2021. This is a prospective, multicenter, open clinical study in which 1164 patients (including 10% drop-off rate) who require surgical treatment are scheduled to be included in the study. Prior to any screening process, each subject / legal guardian should sign the informed consent form. Screening tests are used to determine whether each subject is eligible for the study. Eligible subjects who meet the standard will be treated with radical resection of single-hole inflatable mediastinal mirror synchronization with laparoscopic esophageal carcinoma and followed up until 5 years postoperatively. Primary study outcome are the prioperative complication rate and the number of intraoperative lymph node dissection.
Interventions
PROCEDURESingle-Port Inflatable Mediastinoscopy Combined With Laparoscopic-Assisted Small Incision Surgery
Single-Port Inflatable Mediastinoscopy Combined With Laparoscopic-Assisted Small Incision Surgery dissects, dissociates and removes the esophagus in the mediastinum through an inflatable endoscopy. Detailed surgical procedures and related instructions have been published in Single-Port Inflatable Mediastinoscopy Combined With Laparoscopic-Assisted Small Incision Surgery for Radical Esophagectomy Is an Effective and Safe Treatment for Esophageal Cancer J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Aug;23(8):1533-1540. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-04069-w. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
PROCEDUREThoracoscopy Combined With Laparoscopic Surgery
Patients will receive a standardized thoracoscopy and laparoscopy combined radical esophageal cancer surgery
Sponsors
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
West China Hospital
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Changzhi Medical College
Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Harbin Medical University
Hubei Cancer Hospital
Jining First People's Hospital
Jiangsu Cancer Institute & Hospital
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Intervention model description
The Logrank method was used to compare the difference in survival time between the two groups of patients. According to previous literature data, it is estimated that the DFS of the control group is 18 months. Assuming that the DFS of the test group can be extended to 21.6 months (corresponding HR=1.20), the test requires 1048 patients (524 in each group) to achieve α=0.05 This difference can be detected with 80% confidence at the (two-sided) significance level. The trial plans to enroll for 48 months, follow up for 60 months, and conduct a final analysis when 944 patients have tumor progression (recurrence or metastasis). It is estimated that the drop-off rate of patients in the experimental group and the control group is 10%, so 1164 (524×2÷0.9=1164) patients need to be enrolled in the final group. Significance Level：0.05
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. 18 years old ≤ age ≤ 75 years old, no gender limit; 2. Patients who are diagnosed as esophageal malignant tumor by cytology or histology, and agree to undergo surgical treatment; 3. The preoperative clinical tumor staging is T1-2N0-1M0 patients; or T3N1-2M0 patients undergo neoadjuvant treatment (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and immunotherapy After treatment), assess the tumor to achieve partial response (PR) and surgical resection is feasible; 4. The tumor is located in the thoracic esophagus; 5. The tumor has not invaded the surrounding vital organs and has metastasized far away; 6. The function of major organs is basically normal: general anesthesia is acceptable for lung function; NYHA grade of heart function is 0\ 1; 7. Voluntarily sign an informed consent form before the study. The patient and/or his legal representative have the ability to fully understand the content, process and possible adverse reactions of the experiment, and enable the patient to comply with the visits stipulated in the plan;
Exclusion criteria
1. People who suffer from other malignant tumors at the same time; 2. Patients with a history of esophagus or gastrectomy; 3. Patients with a history of mediastinal surgery or extensive abdominal cavity adhesion; 4. Patients with basic diseases such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases; 5. People suffering from mental, mental or neurological diseases; 6. Patients with cachexia and severe malnutrition who cannot tolerate surgery; 7. Recent recurrence of gastric ulcer, history of gastric bleeding and other serious underlying diseases; 8. Patients with surgical contraindications such as blood coagulation dysfunction, HIV antibody positive, and poorly controlled clinically severe infections; 9. Patients with other comorbid diseases (such as liver and kidney function abnormalities, etc.) or concomitant medications, which may have an impact on the results of this study based on the judgment of the investigator. 10. Patients who have participated in other clinical studies; 11. Others judged by the investigator to be unsuitable to participate in this clinical trial.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Perioperative incidence of cardiopulmonary complications | Through operation completion, an average of 12 days | Perioperative complications include: pulmonary infection, respiratory failure, managed pleural effusion, heart failure, myocardial infarction, managed arrhythmia, anastomotic fistula or gastric fistula, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, chylothorax, unscheduled reoperation |
| disease-free survival（DFS） | After surgery-related treatment until the tumor recurrence，assessed up to 5 years | The period after Operation treatment \[tumor eliminated\] when no disease can be detected |
| overall survival（OS） | From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years | When the precise cause of Esophageal cancer death is not specified, this is called the overall survival rate or observed survival rate. Doctors use mean overall survival rates to estimate the patient's prognosis. This is often expressed over standard time periods, like one, five, and ten years. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative mortality rate | During the operation, an average of 2 hours | The ratio of the number of patients who died during the operation to the number of patients who underwent the operation |
| Postoperative hospital stay | Through postoperative hospital stay, an average of 4 days | The days of postoperative hospitalization |
| Postoperative pain score | An average of 3 days after the operation | Daily pain scores were recorded by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale/Score) 1-3 days after operation |
| intraoperative blood loss | During the operation, an average of 2 hours | Calculation of intraoperative bleeding with ml/kg |
| Postoperative drainage | An average of 3 days after the operation | Total postoperative thoracic or mediastinal drainage (ml/kg) |
| Postoperative retention time of various types of drainage tubes | An average of 3 days after the operation | The retention time of different types of drainage tube |
| Number of lymph nodes removed during surgery | Pathology report time, an average of 4 days | The number of dissected lymph nodes reported in the postoperative pathology report |
| Postoperative admission time to ICU | An average of 3 days after the operation | If the patient needs to be transferred to ICU after operation, stay in icu monitoring time should be observed |
| Operation time | During the operation, an average of 2 hours | Calculate the operating time in minutes |
| Proportion of patients who converted to thoracotomy and laparotomy | During the operation, an average of 2 hours | The ratio of the number of patients converted to thoracotomy or laparotomy to the total number of patients undergoing surgery |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactCao Qingdong, bachelor
Backup ContactWang Xiaojin, master
Outcome results
None listed