Skip to content

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Two Different Oral Delivery Systems of Cholecalciferol

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Two Different Oral Delivery Systems of Cholecalciferol

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05104970
Acronym
PLUTO
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-11-03
Start date
2022-08-09
Completion date
2023-02-10
Last updated
2022-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vitamin D Deficiency

Keywords

Vitamin D

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to adapt the gold standard of research and to explore the comparative bioavailability and clinical efficacy of the two most commonly used forms of Cholecalciferol i.e. ampoules and softgel capsules.

Detailed description

Deficiency of Vitamin D is highly prevalent in all sectors and regions of Pakistan. Its effects encompass multiple pluripotent physiological impacts on human body, including its classical action on bone health and immune modulation. Health care workers are routinely prescribing supplementations to correct the deficiencies. Different forms of Cholecalciferol are available in the market. It ranges from absorba liquids, drops, tablets, softgels to injectable and oral ampoules. Different delivery systems offer different advantages, challenges and efficacies specific to their specific pharmacokinetics. The aim of this study is to adapt the gold standard of research and to explore the comparative bioavailability and clinical efficacy of the two most commonly used forms of Cholecalciferol i.e. ampoules and softgel capsules.

Interventions

DRUGSunnyD insta ampoule

Cholecalciferol 200000 IU insta ampoule

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTSunnyD STAT softgel capsule

Cholecalciferol 200000 IU softgel capsule

DRUGPlacebo SunnyD insta ampoule

Olive oil

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo SunnyD STAT softgel capsule

Olive oil

Sponsors

Rawalpindi Medical College
CollaboratorOTHER
Scotmann Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

double blinded placebo controlled

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult (20-70 years of age) 2. Vitamin D deficiency (serum 25(OH)D \< 20 ng/ml) 3. Permanent employees of Medicine ward of Holy Family Hospital, DHQ, BBH hospitals and RMU for easy follow up throughout the study duration 4. Willingness and availability to show-up in the follow up visit and serum testing throughout the study period as needed

Exclusion criteria

1. Vitamin D sufficiency or moderate deficiency (serum 25(OH)D \> 20 ng/ml) 2. Pregnant ladies 3. Participants already taking Vitamin D supplementation, anti-convulsants, barbiturates or steroids 4. Subjects with granulomatous conditions, liver disease, kidney disease, or diabetes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under Curve (AUC)70 daysArea Under Curve (AUC) trail follow-up at 0,1,7,28,70. Trapezoidal method for calculations would be used and levels would be reported from lab essay of 25(OH)D

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum 25(OH)D level3 monthsSerum 25(OH)D level would be checked at the end of the trial after 3 months to assess the change in levels (if any). It would be assessed through laboratory essay

Contacts

Primary ContactSyeda Saba Aslam, MBBS, MPH
syedasabaaslam@gmail.com00923136674333
Backup ContactFazlur Rehman, MBBS,FCPS
lonsa25@student.london.ac.uk00923005226950

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026