Skip to content

IVIG Versus Plasmapheresis in the Treatment of Guillian Barrie Syndrome Patients

IVIG Versus Plasmapheresis and Guillian Barrie Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05104762
Enrollment
81
Registered
2021-11-03
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
2023-03-03
Last updated
2023-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Keywords

IVIG / plasmapheresis and Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Brief summary

In this study, the investigators address the question: whether treatment with IVIG is superior to treatment using plasmapheresis for functional recovery of patients with GBS? Recovery was quantified using: The changes in the A-Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score ) and B-overall neuropathy limitations scale as the primary outcome and the changes in Neurophysiological study 3 months after treatment as a secondary outcome. This information will be used to evaluate which treatment is more beneficial to GBS patients.

Detailed description

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an inflammatory disease of the PNS and is the most common cause of acute flaccid paralysis, with an annual global incidence of approximately 1-2 per 100,000 person-years. Patients with GBS typically present with weakness and sensory signs in the legs that progress to the arms and cranial muscles, although the clinical presentation of the disease is heterogeneous and several distinct clinical variants exist. Diagnosis of GBS is based on the patient's history and neurological, electrophysiological, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examinations. Electrophysiological studies: provide evidence of peripheral nervous system (PNS) dysfunction and can distinguish between the subtypes of GBS: acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP), acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN), and acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN). Disease progression can be rapid, and most patients with GBS reach their maximum disability within 2 weeks. About 20% of patients with GBS develop respiratory failure and require mechanical ventilation. Cardiac arrhythmias and blood pressure instability can occur owing to the involvement of the autonomic nervous system. Immunomodulatory therapy should be started if patients are unable to walk independently for 10 m. Evidence on treatment efficacy in patients who can still walk independently is limited, but treatment should be considered, especially if these patients display rapidly progressive weakness or other severe symptoms such as autonomic dysfunction, bulbar failure, or respiratory insufficiency. Clinical trials have demonstrated a treatment effect for intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) when started within 2 weeks of the onset of weakness and for plasma exchange when started within 4 weeks.

Interventions

DEVICEplasmapheresis device

Group 1: 54 patients of Guillian Barrie syndrome undergo plasma exchange (5 sessions)

DRUGIntravenous immunoglobulin

group 2: 27 patients undergo intravenous injection of immunoglobulin for 5 consecutive days of IVIG 0.4gm/kg/day.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Triple-blind (participant and investigator, accessor) using closed envelope 2:1 was applied. 5 sessions of plasmapheresis: IVIG 0.4g IVIG/Kg /day for 5 consecutive days. The investigators didn't know what was the type of treatment that patients received and the patient didn't know that there is another line of treatment.

Intervention model description

2 groups of patients with Guillian Barrie syndrome were subjected to plasmapheresis or IVIG by percentage 2:1 respectively according to availability of IVIG

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18-70 years old, * Onset: Recent onset of GBS through the first 2 weeks. * Gender: Male or Female Inclusion Criteria.

Exclusion criteria

* patients with metabolic disorders, or malignancy, * other causes of peripheral neuropathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score )the points change from baseline scale and after 3 months follow upClinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score ) from zero ( no power ) up to 60 full power (points): sum score of muscle power in both upper limbs and lower limbs in points .
Overall neuropathy limitations scale (ONLS) .the changes in points from baseline assessment score to 3 months follow up assessment score.it is modified disability sum score: sum of arm grade and leg grade limitation score; arm grade from zero point ( less limitation ) to 5 points ( most limitation ) and leg grade from zero point ( less limitation) to 7 points (more limitation)
ERASMUS GBS respiratory insufficiency score EGRISthe change in points from baseline assessment score to 3 months follow up assessment score.Predict the probability of respiratory insufficiency within the first week of admission, in individual patients with Guillain-Barre. syndrome from zero to 7 points score : 0 point ( no affection ) , 7 point ( severe affection )

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neurophysiological study: Distal latency in mill second, Nerve conduction velocities in Meter/second, and F-wave latency mill secondthe change in points from baseline assessment score to 3 months follow up assessment score.Neurophysiological study neurophysiological study pre- and after 3 months change of degree of affection and improvement in latency in nerve conduction m/ sec. amplitude m/v , velocity of nerve /s conduction and F-wave of both upper limbs and lower limbs

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026