Skip to content

Homeopathic Treatment of Post-acute COVID-19 Syndrome

Homeopathic Treatment of Post-acute COVID-19 Syndrome- A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05104749
Enrollment
77
Registered
2021-11-03
Start date
2021-09-15
Completion date
2022-04-22
Last updated
2023-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-acute Covid-19 Syndrome

Keywords

Long Covid

Brief summary

To determine whether an individually prescribed homeopathic medicine has an effect greater than a placebo and is a viable treatment option to improve fatigue and quality of life for patients suffering from the symptoms of Post-acute COVID-19 Syndrome. The researchers hope to achieve this goal by conducting a clinical trial that is scientifically rigorous and clinically relevant. Expected results of this pilot study will be to obtain sufficient experience and preliminary feasibility data to justify a larger clinical trial of this hypothesis.

Detailed description

The researchers objectives for the study are to: 1) identify efficient means of recruiting subjects, 2) test and refine the initial study design and treatment protocol, 3) evaluate the instruments for assessing treatment outcomes, 4) estimate sample sizes that will be required in the full-scale trial, 5) determine which homeopathic medicines are most often prescribed for this syndrome, and 6) determine whether there is a measurable effect size difference or positive trend in reduction of symptoms in patients treated with homeopathy.

Interventions

Homeopathic medicines are prepared according to standardized methods as specified by the Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States (HPUS), which was mandated by Congress to regulate the manufacture of homeopathic medicines as part of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act of 1939. All homeopathic medicines prescribed in this study must be found in the HPUS. For a complete list of homeopathic medicines, contact the researchers.

OTHERPlacebo

Inert lactose pellets

Sponsors

Samueli Institute for Information Biology
CollaboratorOTHER
Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Both study medication and placebo are identical in appearance, odor, and taste. Statistician will be blinded as to treatment group.

Intervention model description

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ages 18-64 * Any ethnicity * Adequate cognitive function to be able to give informed consent * Technologically competent to complete web forms and perform video calls * Positive PCR test (polymerase chain reaction) result for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) * Persistent fatigue for a minimum of 60 days since diagnosis of Covid-19. * A fatigue score above 21 in the Fatigue Assessment Scale upon enrollment * Willing to fill out regular questionnaires * Willing to use homeopathic medicines

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant kidney, heart, or hepatic impairment as determined by clinical judgment * Previous hospitalization in ICU for Covid-19 * Diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, or Lyme disease prior to Covid-19 * Chronic psychiatric illness or neurological illness prior to Covid-19 diagnosis Taking opioid analgesics, opioid dependence or undergoing treatment for substance abuse or addiction * Taking steroid medication or immunosuppressive medications * Suspected or confirmed pregnancy or breastfeeding * Active cancers * Current treatment by a homeopathic practitioner * Initiation of another treatment for Long Covid within the past 2 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeksThe Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) is a 10-item self-report scale evaluating symptoms of chronic fatigue. The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with a higher score indicating more severe fatigue. Less than 22 indicates normal (i.e. healthy) levels of fatigue between 22 and 34 indicates mild-to-moderate fatigue 35 or more indicates severe fatigue (Hendricks et al., 2018).
SF-36 Physical Composite Score (PCS)Baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeksQuality of life was evaluated by using the the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which was completed by participants throughout the study. The SF-36 evaluates 8 health concepts and can be aggregated into two summary scores: the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary scores. Each item of the scale ranges from 0-100, where high values mean good health status, while lower values indicate poor health status. Items are averaged together to create PCS or MCS scale scores.
SF-36 Mental Composite Score (MCS)Baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeksQuality of life was evaluated by using the the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which was completed by participants throughout the study. The SF-36 evaluates 8 health concepts and can be aggregated into two summary scores: the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary scores. Each item of the scale ranges from 0-100, where high values mean good health status, while lower values indicate poor health status. Items are averaged together to create PCS or MCS scale scores. 

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)Baseline and 12 weeksThe Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a self-administered tool for assessing depression The PHQ-9 scores each of the 9 DSM-IV depression criteria as 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, with scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 representing mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively.
Patient Doctor Depth of Relationship (PDDR)12 weeksThe Patient Doctor Depth of Relationship (PDDR) scale is an eight item, patient self-completed questionnaire designed to measure patient-doctor relational depth. A single overall depth-of-relationship score can be calculated, which ranges from 0 (no relationship) to 32 (very strong relationship).
Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile Symptom #1Baseline and 12 weeksThe Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile (MYMOP) is a problem specific and individualized measure that captures what patients consider are the two most important symptoms associated with their condition (Long COVID) and an activity of daily living that is affected by these symptoms. The symptom is then rated by the patient on a scale 0-6 where higher values mean poor health and lower values indicate good health.
Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile Symptom #2Baseline and 12 weeksThe Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile (MYMOP) is a problem specific and individualized measure that captures what patients consider are the two most important symptoms associated with their condition (Long COVID) and an activity of daily living that is affected by these symptoms. The symptom is then rated by the patient on a scale 0-6 where higher values mean poor health and lower values indicate good health.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Homeopathic Treatment Group
Long Covid patients received individualized homeopathic treatment with homeopathic medicines. Dosage and frequency of administration was determined by each provider on an individualized basis.
38
Placebo Group
Long Covid patients received placebo homeopathic medicines (i.e. identical lactose pellets in size, odor, and taste without the impregnated homeopathic medicines)
39
Total77

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalHomeopathic Treatment GroupPlacebo Group
Age, Continuous42.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Baseline Score in Fatigue Assessment Scale35.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
34.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
35.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
Baseline Score in MYMOP Symptom #14.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
4.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
4.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Baseline Score in MYMOP Symptom #24.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
4.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
4.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Baseline Score in PHQ-911.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
12.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
10.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
Baseline Score in SF-36 Mental Combined score (MCS)36.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4
35.7 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.3
37.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.7
Baseline Score in SF-36 Physical Composite Score (PCS)44.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.9
45.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4
42.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.4
BMI26.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
27.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
26.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
Duration of Long Covid Symptoms266.2 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 146.6
246.4 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 141
285.5 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 151.1
Education Status
Bachelor's Degree
29 Participants17 Participants12 Participants
Education Status
High School
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Education Status
Master's Degree
17 Participants8 Participants9 Participants
Education Status
PhD or higher
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Education Status
Some college
28 Participants12 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
72 Participants34 Participants38 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Hospitalization Rate for Acute Covid-19 Infection9 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Number of Long Covid Booster Participants25 Participants11 Participants14 Participants
Number of Medications
1-2
22 Participants10 Participants12 Participants
Number of Medications
3 or more
25 Participants13 Participants12 Participants
Number of Medications
Zero
30 Participants15 Participants15 Participants
Number of Supplements
1-4
31 Participants17 Participants14 Participants
Number of Supplements
5 or more
30 Participants16 Participants14 Participants
Number of Supplements
Zero
16 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Number of Vaccinated Participants59 Participants29 Participants30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
69 Participants34 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
62 Participants31 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants7 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 380 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 386 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 382 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)

The Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) is a 10-item self-report scale evaluating symptoms of chronic fatigue. The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with a higher score indicating more severe fatigue. Less than 22 indicates normal (i.e. healthy) levels of fatigue between 22 and 34 indicates mild-to-moderate fatigue 35 or more indicates severe fatigue (Hendricks et al., 2018).

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks

Population: All patients under randomization were included (intention-to-treat population) regardless whether or not they adhered to the treatment protocol or provided complete data sets.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Homeopathic Treatment GroupFatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)4 Weeks32.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Homeopathic Treatment GroupFatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)12 Weeks29.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
Homeopathic Treatment GroupFatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)8 Weeks29.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Placebo GroupFatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)4 Weeks31.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Placebo GroupFatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)8 Weeks27.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Placebo GroupFatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)12 Weeks27.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Primary

SF-36 Mental Composite Score (MCS)

Quality of life was evaluated by using the the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which was completed by participants throughout the study. The SF-36 evaluates 8 health concepts and can be aggregated into two summary scores: the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary scores. Each item of the scale ranges from 0-100, where high values mean good health status, while lower values indicate poor health status. Items are averaged together to create PCS or MCS scale scores. 

Time frame: Baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Homeopathic Treatment GroupSF-36 Mental Composite Score (MCS)Week 443.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.6
Homeopathic Treatment GroupSF-36 Mental Composite Score (MCS)Week 847.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Homeopathic Treatment GroupSF-36 Mental Composite Score (MCS)Week 1249.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
Placebo GroupSF-36 Mental Composite Score (MCS)Week 450.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
Placebo GroupSF-36 Mental Composite Score (MCS)Week 854.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
Placebo GroupSF-36 Mental Composite Score (MCS)Week 1257.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.7
Primary

SF-36 Physical Composite Score (PCS)

Quality of life was evaluated by using the the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which was completed by participants throughout the study. The SF-36 evaluates 8 health concepts and can be aggregated into two summary scores: the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary scores. Each item of the scale ranges from 0-100, where high values mean good health status, while lower values indicate poor health status. Items are averaged together to create PCS or MCS scale scores.

Time frame: Baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Homeopathic Treatment GroupSF-36 Physical Composite Score (PCS)4 Weeks51.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
Homeopathic Treatment GroupSF-36 Physical Composite Score (PCS)8 Weeks55.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
Homeopathic Treatment GroupSF-36 Physical Composite Score (PCS)12 Weeks55.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Placebo GroupSF-36 Physical Composite Score (PCS)4 Weeks51.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
Placebo GroupSF-36 Physical Composite Score (PCS)8 Weeks58.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.5
Placebo GroupSF-36 Physical Composite Score (PCS)12 Weeks61.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.4
Secondary

Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile Symptom #1

The Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile (MYMOP) is a problem specific and individualized measure that captures what patients consider are the two most important symptoms associated with their condition (Long COVID) and an activity of daily living that is affected by these symptoms. The symptom is then rated by the patient on a scale 0-6 where higher values mean poor health and lower values indicate good health.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Homeopathic Treatment GroupMeasure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile Symptom #11.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Placebo GroupMeasure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile Symptom #11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile Symptom #2

The Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile (MYMOP) is a problem specific and individualized measure that captures what patients consider are the two most important symptoms associated with their condition (Long COVID) and an activity of daily living that is affected by these symptoms. The symptom is then rated by the patient on a scale 0-6 where higher values mean poor health and lower values indicate good health.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Homeopathic Treatment GroupMeasure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile Symptom #21.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Placebo GroupMeasure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile Symptom #21.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Patient Doctor Depth of Relationship (PDDR)

The Patient Doctor Depth of Relationship (PDDR) scale is an eight item, patient self-completed questionnaire designed to measure patient-doctor relational depth. A single overall depth-of-relationship score can be calculated, which ranges from 0 (no relationship) to 32 (very strong relationship).

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Homeopathic Treatment GroupPatient Doctor Depth of Relationship (PDDR)24.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Placebo GroupPatient Doctor Depth of Relationship (PDDR)24.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Secondary

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a self-administered tool for assessing depression The PHQ-9 scores each of the 9 DSM-IV depression criteria as 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27, with scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 representing mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Homeopathic Treatment GroupPatient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)7.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Placebo GroupPatient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)6.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026