Skip to content

Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies

Factors Influencing the Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies Undergoing Cesarean Section: a Cross-sectional Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05104255
Enrollment
527
Registered
2021-11-02
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2020-02-01
Last updated
2024-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neonate, Twin Pregnancy

Keywords

General anesthesia, Neonate, Obstetric anesthesia, Pregnancy Outcomes, Spinal anesthesia, Twins, Twin pregnancy

Brief summary

Multiple pregnancies are associated with increased maternal and fetal risks compared to singleton pregnancies. Additionally, the cesarean section rate is quite high in multiple pregnancies. This study aimed to evaluate maternal and fetal characteristics and factors affecting fetal outcomes in twin pregnancies delivered by cesarean section.

Detailed description

While the frequency of multiple pregnancies varies significantly among societies and individuals, especially in middle and high-income countries, the rate of multiple pregnancies has shown a significant rise worldwide in recent years, with the frequent use of assisted reproductive techniques, which has increased due to an increase in maternal age and a decrease in fertility. As a result, multiple pregnancies constitute approximately 2-4% of all births. Multiple pregnancies are known to be associated with increased maternal and fetal risks compared to singleton pregnancies. While maternal mortality associated with a twin pregnancy is 2.5 times higher than in singleton pregnancy, adverse neonatal outcomes such as perinatal mortality, fetal growth restriction, and low birth weight are two to three times higher in twins than in singleton newborns. Moreover, neonatal near-miss, which refers to cases that almost resulted in death, is associated with multiple pregnancies. For all these reasons, the planned cesarean section has been advocated over planned vaginal delivery to reduce the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes (especially for the second-born twin). However, cesarean delivery is known to be associated with a higher risk of maternal morbidity and poor neonatal outcomes. The vast majority of these risks are related to maternal hypotension, prolonged uterine-incision-to-delivery time, and general anesthesia. From this perspective, we aimed to evaluate maternal and fetal characteristics and factors affecting fetal outcomes in twin pregnancies delivered by cesarean section.

Interventions

PROCEDURESpinal anesthesia

Twins delivered under under spinal anesthesia

PROCEDUREGeneral anesthesia

Twins delivered under general anesthesia

Sponsors

Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Derince Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Twin pregnancies * Parturients delivered by cesarean section

Exclusion criteria

* The triplets or more multiple pregnancies * Twins delivered through the vaginal route were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Appearance-Pulse-Grimace-Activity-Respiration-1st minute (worst:0; best:10)1 minuteAppearance-Pulse-Grimace-Activity-Respiration (APGAR) score at the 1st minute after delivery
Appearance-Pulse-Grimace-Activity-Respiration-5th minute (worst:0; best:10)5 minuteAppearance-Pulse-Grimace-Activity-Respiration (APGAR) score at the 5th minute after delivery
The Number of Participants Admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit1 hourAdmission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit after delivery
The Number of Participants needed for Mechanical ventilation28 daysThe need for non-invasive and invasive mechanical ventilation
The Rate of Death28 daysNeonatal mortality within the first 28 days after birth.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026