Skip to content

Telehealth Physical Therapy for Chronic Back Pain - Ancillary Study to NCT03859713

Observational Study of Telehealth Physical Therapy Provided for Persons With Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05103462
Acronym
TeleOPT
Enrollment
126
Registered
2021-11-02
Start date
2020-08-18
Completion date
2021-08-13
Last updated
2021-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Telehealth, Physical therapy, Chronic pain

Brief summary

This study evaluated the feasibility of an 8-week physical therapy program for persons with chronic low back pain provided entirely using telehealth with real-time, interactive video sessions with a physical therapist.

Detailed description

At the time of the onset of the COVID pandemic, the research team was conducting a clinical trial (the OPTIMIZE trial) investigating different nonpharmacologic treatments for persons with chronic low back pain (NCT03859713). One intervention arm in this trial is in-person physical therapy. COVID-related restrictions on in-person care prompted suspension of the OPTIMIZE trial. In order to accommodate persons in the midst of receiving treatment at the time of suspension, the study team adapted the in-person protocol for physical therapy for telehealth delivery using two-way, real-time video sessions. Because of the lack of research examining the feasibility of telehealth physical therapy provided in this manner, the study team decided to conduct a pilot study to examine the feasibility of the telehealth protocol. This study was a prospective, longitudinal cohort of persons with chronic LBP seeking care in one of three healthcare systems; University of Utah Health and Intermountain Healthcare in Salt Lake City, Utah, and Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland. All participants were offered up to 8 weekly sessions of telehealth physical therapy. Outcomes included measures of acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and fidelity as well as effectiveness measures including the Oswestry Disability Index and the PROMIS-29 health domains. Assessments occurred at baseline and after 10- and 26-weeks.

Interventions

Weekly sessions of physical therapy provided using two-way, interactive, video technology consisting of education, advice and exercise instruction.

Sponsors

Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
Johns Hopkins University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

The study has only one arm

Intervention model description

Prospective, longitudinal cohort design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 - 64 years at the time of enrollment. * Meets NIH Task Force definition of chronic LBP based on two questions: 1) How long has LBP has been an ongoing problem for you? and 2) How often has LBP been an ongoing problem for you over the past 6 months? A response of greater than 3 months to question 1, and at least half the days in the past 6 months to question 2 is required to satisfy the NIH definition of chronic LBP. * Healthcare visit for LBP in the past 90 days. * At least moderate levels of pain and disability requiring ODI score \>24 and pain intensity rating \> 4.

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of serious pathology as a cause of LBP including neoplasm, inflammatory disease (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis), vertebral osteomyelitis, etc. * Evidence of a specific spinal pathology as the cause of LBP including spine fracture, spinal stenosis, radiculopathy, etc. * Knowingly pregnant * Unable to participate in telehealth due to lack of technology or internet access * Has received physical therapy for LBP in prior 90 days * Currently receiving substance use disorder treatment * Any lumbar spine surgery in the past year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant Satisfaction with Telehealth Treatment10-weeksSurvey of participants evaluating treatment satisfaction
Rate of refusal to participateBaselineRatio of persons entering the study among all those eligibility for enrollment
Rate of enrolled participants initiating telehealth treatment10-weeksRatio of persons attending at least 1 treatment session among all those enrolled
Number of sessions10-weeksNumber of telehealth physical therapy sessions attended
Change in Oswestry from baseline to 10-weeksbaseline, 10 weeks10 item measure of back pain-related disability
Change in Oswestry from baseline to 26-weeksbaseline, 26 weeks10 item measure of back pain-related disability
Change in Pain Interference from baseline to 10 weeksbaseline, 10 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Pain Interference from baseline to 26 weeksbaseline, 26 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Pain Intensity from baseline to 10 weeksbaseline, 10 weeksPROMIS single item (part of PROMIS-29) assessing pain intensity on 0-10 rating scale
Change in Pain Intensity from baseline to 26 weeksbaseline, 26 weeksPROMIS single item (part of PROMIS-29) assessing pain intensity on 0-10 rating scale
Change in Fatigue from baseline to 10 weeksbaseline, 10 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Fatigue from baseline to 26 weeksbaseline, 26 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Sleep Disturbance from baseline to 10 weeksbaseline, 10 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Sleep Disturbance from baseline to 26 weeksbaseline, 26 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Anxiety from baseline to 10 weeksbaseline, 10 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Anxiety from baseline to 26 weeksbaseline, 26 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Depression from baseline to 10 weeksbaseline, 10 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Depression from baseline to 26 weeksbaseline, 26 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Social Role Participation from baseline to 10 weeksbaseline, 10 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Social Role Participation from baseline to 26 weeksbaseline, 26 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Physical Function from baseline to 10 weeksbaseline, 10 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Physical Function from baseline to 26 weeksbaseline, 26 weeksPROMIS 4-item short form (part of PROMIS-29) assessed as a T-score with mean = 50 and SD = 10
Change in Pain Self-Efficacy Scale from baseline to 10 weeksbaseline, 10 weeks10-item measure of confidence in performing activities even with pain
Change in Pain Self-Efficacy Scale from baseline to 26 weeksbaseline, 26 weeks10-item measure of confidence in performing activities even with pain

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026